[PATCH v10 1/4] MIPS: Loongson64: dts: update the display controller device node

[Sui Jingfeng]

On 2022/2/21 17:19, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 2/20/22 5:55 PM, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
>
>> From: suijingfeng <suijingfeng at loongson.cn>
>>
>> The display controller is a pci device, its PCI vendor id is 0x0014
>> its PCI device id is 0x7a06.
>>
>> 1) In order to let the driver to know which chip the DC is contained
>>     in, the compatible string of the display controller is updated
>>     according to the chip's name.
>>
>> 2) Add display controller device node for ls2k1000 SoC
>>
>> Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: suijingfeng <suijingfeng at loongson.cn>
>> Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <15330273260 at 189.cn>
>> ---
>>   arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson64-2k1000.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
>>   arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/ls7a-pch.dtsi          | 7 ++-----
>>   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson64-2k1000.dtsi b/arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson64-2k1000.dtsi
>> index 768cf2abcea3..af9cda540f9e 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson64-2k1000.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson64-2k1000.dtsi
>> @@ -209,6 +209,14 @@ gpu at 5,0 {
>>   				interrupt-parent = <&liointc0>;
>>   			};
>>   
>> +			lsdc: display-controller at 6,0 {
>     Shouldn't the node name just be "display", according to the section 2.2.2
> of the DT spec?
>
> [...]
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/ls7a-pch.dtsi b/arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/ls7a-pch.dtsi
>> index 2f45fce2cdc4..ec35ea9b2fe8 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/ls7a-pch.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/ls7a-pch.dtsi
>> @@ -160,11 +160,8 @@ gpu at 6,0 {
>>   				interrupt-parent = <&pic>;
>>   			};
>>   
>> -			dc at 6,1 {
>> -				compatible = "pci0014,7a06.0",
>> -						   "pci0014,7a06",
>> -						   "pciclass030000",
>> -						   "pciclass0300";
>> +			lsdc: display-controller at 6,1 {
>     Same here...
>
> [...]
>
> MBR, Sergey

Display sounds like a panel or monitor, while we are the device that driven the display device.

Running find . -name "*.dtsi" -type f | xargs grep "display-controller"
at drm-tip/arch/ directory show that there are a number of vendors using
display controller as theirnode name, for example Atmel and STM32.


./arm/boot/dts/pxa3xx.dtsi:		gcu: display-controller at 54000000 {
./arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12.dtsi:				hlcdc-display-controller {
./arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12.dtsi:					compatible = "atmel,hlcdc-display-controller";
./arm/boot/dts/at91-dvk_su60_somc_lcm.dtsi:	hlcdc-display-controller {
./arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi:		ltdc: display-controller at 50001000 {
./arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi:		ltdc: display-controller at 5a001000 {
./arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5dm.dtsi:	hlcdc-display-controller {
./arm/boot/dts/gemini.dtsi:		display-controller at 6a000000 {
./arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi:		ltdc: display-controller at 40016800 {
./arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_lcd.dtsi:				hlcdc-display-controller {
./arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5_lcd.dtsi:					compatible = "atmel,hlcdc-display-controller";
./arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi:				hlcdc-display-controller {
./arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi:					compatible = "atmel,hlcdc-display-controller";
./arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi:				hlcdc-display-controller {
./arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi:					compatible = "atmel,hlcdc-display-controller";
./arm/boot/dts/sama5d3_lcd.dtsi:				hlcdc-display-controller {
./arm/boot/dts/sama5d3_lcd.dtsi:					compatible = "atmel,hlcdc-display-controller";
./arm/boot/dts/sam9x60.dtsi:				hlcdc-display-controller {
./arm/boot/dts/sam9x60.dtsi:					compatible = "atmel,hlcdc-display-controller";

./arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d4_ma5d4evk.dts:				hlcdc-display-controller {
./arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12ek.dts:				hlcdc-display-controller {
./arm/boot/dts/am335x-pdu001.dts:	display-controller at 0 {
./arm/boot/dts/at91-nattis-2-natte-2.dts:	hlcdc-display-controller {
./arm/boot/dts/gemini-dlink-dir-685.dts:		display-controller at 6a000000 {