[Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 2/9] dma-buf: warn about dma_fence_array container rules
Christian König
ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Fri Jan 21 11:00:59 UTC 2022
Am 21.01.22 um 08:31 schrieb Thomas Hellström:
>
> On 1/20/22 14:27, Christian König wrote:
>> It's not allowed to nest another dma_fence container into a
>> dma_fence_array
>> or otherwise we can run into recursion.
>>
>> Warn about that when we create a dma_fence_array.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>> ---
>> drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c
>> b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c
>> index 3e07f961e2f3..4bfbcb885bbc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c
>> @@ -176,6 +176,19 @@ struct dma_fence_array
>> *dma_fence_array_create(int num_fences,
>> array->base.error = PENDING_ERROR;
>> + /* dma_fence_array objects should never contain any other fence
> Nit: First comment line of multi-line comments shouldn't contain text.
>> + * containers or otherwise we run into recursion and potential
>> kernel
>> + * stack overflow on operations on the dma_fence_array.
>> + *
>> + * The correct way of handling this is to flatten out the array
>> by the
>> + * caller instead.
>> + *
>> + * Enforce this here by checking that we don't create a
>> dma_fence_array
>> + * with any container inside.
>> + */
>> + while (seqno--)
>> + WARN_ON(dma_fence_is_container(fences[seqno]));
>> +
>
> s/seqno/num_fences/g ?
Ah, of course! Typing to fast.
Thanks,
Christian.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>> return array;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_array_create);
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list