[PATCH 04/11] dma-buf: warn about dma_fence_array container rules v2
Thomas Hellström
thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com
Mon Jan 24 16:32:06 UTC 2022
On Mon, 2022-01-24 at 14:03 +0100, Christian König wrote:
> It's not allowed to nest another dma_fence container into a
> dma_fence_array
> or otherwise we can run into recursion.
>
> Warn about that when we create a dma_fence_array.
>
> v2: fix comment style and typo in the warning pointed out by Thomas
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-
> fence-array.c
> index 3e07f961e2f3..cb1bacb5a42b 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-array.c
> @@ -176,6 +176,20 @@ struct dma_fence_array
> *dma_fence_array_create(int num_fences,
>
> array->base.error = PENDING_ERROR;
>
> + /*
> + * dma_fence_array objects should never contain any other
> fence
> + * containers or otherwise we run into recursion and
> potential kernel
> + * stack overflow on operations on the dma_fence_array.
> + *
> + * The correct way of handling this is to flatten out the
> array by the
> + * caller instead.
> + *
> + * Enforce this here by checking that we don't create a
> dma_fence_array
> + * with any container inside.
> + */
> + while (num_fences--)
> + WARN_ON(dma_fence_is_container(fences[num_fences]));
> +
> return array;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_array_create);
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list