[PATCH 01/12] drm/ttm: add ttm_resource_fini
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Tue Jan 25 16:26:07 UTC 2022
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 01:25:03PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Make sure we call the common cleanup function in all
> implementations of the resource manager.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_preempt_mgr.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.h | 3 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c | 9 +++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.c | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_sys_manager.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gmrid_manager.c | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_system_manager.c | 1 +
> include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h | 3 +++
> 13 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c
> index 675a72ef305d..ea5470c8c921 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gtt_mgr.c
> @@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ static int amdgpu_gtt_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> return 0;
>
> err_free:
> + ttm_resource_fini(man, &node->base.base);
> kfree(node);
>
> err_out:
> @@ -200,6 +201,7 @@ static void amdgpu_gtt_mgr_del(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> if (!(res->placement & TTM_PL_FLAG_TEMPORARY))
> atomic64_sub(res->num_pages, &mgr->used);
>
> + ttm_resource_fini(man, res);
> kfree(node);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_preempt_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_preempt_mgr.c
> index d02c8637f909..ffddec08e931 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_preempt_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_preempt_mgr.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ static void amdgpu_preempt_mgr_del(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> struct amdgpu_preempt_mgr *mgr = to_preempt_mgr(man);
>
> atomic64_sub(res->num_pages, &mgr->used);
> + ttm_resource_fini(man, res);
> kfree(res);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c
> index 7b2b0980ec41..55d68408951d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c
> @@ -476,6 +476,7 @@ static int amdgpu_vram_mgr_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> while (i--)
> drm_mm_remove_node(&node->mm_nodes[i]);
> spin_unlock(&mgr->lock);
> + ttm_resource_fini(man, &node->base);
> kvfree(node);
>
> error_sub:
> @@ -515,6 +516,7 @@ static void amdgpu_vram_mgr_del(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> atomic64_sub(usage, &mgr->usage);
> atomic64_sub(vis_usage, &mgr->vis_usage);
>
> + ttm_resource_fini(man, res);
> kvfree(node);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c
> index 6ba314f9836a..bf857703c797 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c
> @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ static void i915_ttm_buddy_man_free(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> drm_buddy_free_list(&bman->mm, &bman_res->blocks);
> mutex_unlock(&bman->lock);
>
> + ttm_resource_fini(man, res);
> kfree(bman_res);
> }
The call in i915_ttm_buddy_man_alloc() in the error unwind call is
missing.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.c
> index 2ca3207c13fc..2e517cdc24c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.c
> @@ -162,11 +162,12 @@ nouveau_mem_vram(struct ttm_resource *reg, bool contig, u8 page)
> }
>
> void
> -nouveau_mem_del(struct ttm_resource *reg)
> +nouveau_mem_del(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, struct ttm_resource *reg)
> {
> struct nouveau_mem *mem = nouveau_mem(reg);
>
> nouveau_mem_fini(mem);
> + ttm_resource_fini(man, reg);
> kfree(mem);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.h
> index 2c01166a90f2..325551eba5cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.h
> @@ -23,7 +23,8 @@ nouveau_mem(struct ttm_resource *reg)
>
> int nouveau_mem_new(struct nouveau_cli *, u8 kind, u8 comp,
> struct ttm_resource **);
> -void nouveau_mem_del(struct ttm_resource *);
> +void nouveau_mem_del(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> + struct ttm_resource *);
> int nouveau_mem_vram(struct ttm_resource *, bool contig, u8 page);
> int nouveau_mem_host(struct ttm_resource *, struct ttm_tt *);
> void nouveau_mem_fini(struct nouveau_mem *);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
> index 2ca9d9a9e5d5..91ef33f8f22c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
> @@ -36,9 +36,10 @@
> #include <core/tegra.h>
>
> static void
> -nouveau_manager_del(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, struct ttm_resource *reg)
> +nouveau_manager_del(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> + struct ttm_resource *reg)
> {
> - nouveau_mem_del(reg);
> + nouveau_mem_del(man, reg);
> }
>
> static int
> @@ -62,7 +63,7 @@ nouveau_vram_manager_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
>
> ret = nouveau_mem_vram(*res, nvbo->contig, nvbo->page);
> if (ret) {
> - nouveau_mem_del(*res);
> + nouveau_mem_del(man, *res);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -118,7 +119,7 @@ nv04_gart_manager_new(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> ret = nvif_vmm_get(&mem->cli->vmm.vmm, PTES, false, 12, 0,
> (long)(*res)->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT, &mem->vma[0]);
> if (ret) {
> - nouveau_mem_del(*res);
> + nouveau_mem_del(man, *res);
> return ret;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.c
> index 072e0baf2ab4..55a41355f684 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_range_manager.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ static int ttm_range_man_alloc(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> spin_unlock(&rman->lock);
>
> if (unlikely(ret)) {
> + ttm_resource_fini(man, *res);
> kfree(node);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -108,6 +109,7 @@ static void ttm_range_man_free(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> drm_mm_remove_node(&node->mm_nodes[0]);
> spin_unlock(&rman->lock);
>
> + ttm_resource_fini(man, res);
> kfree(node);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
> index 035d71332d18..89bcfe22a0ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,12 @@ void ttm_resource_init(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_resource_init);
>
Please add kerneldoc here, minimally mention from which callback this
usually should be called from. And also link from the kerneldoc of
ttm_resource_init to this one and back for completeness. I just like to
link stuff as much as possible :-)
Which I guess please add kerneldoc for the _init() version too at least,
we got to start somewhere ... Maybe even the entire file, probably worth
it to review this all and update as part of the lru extraction work here.
> +void ttm_resource_fini(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> + struct ttm_resource *res)
> +{
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_resource_fini);
> +
> int ttm_resource_alloc(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> const struct ttm_place *place,
> struct ttm_resource **res_ptr)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_sys_manager.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_sys_manager.c
> index 63aca52f75e1..135394dcca95 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_sys_manager.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_sys_manager.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ static int ttm_sys_man_alloc(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> static void ttm_sys_man_free(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> struct ttm_resource *res)
> {
> + ttm_resource_fini(man, res);
> kfree(res);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gmrid_manager.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gmrid_manager.c
> index ebb4505a31a3..99ccf690f8a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gmrid_manager.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_gmrid_manager.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ static int vmw_gmrid_man_get_node(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> gman->used_gmr_pages -= (*res)->num_pages;
> spin_unlock(&gman->lock);
> ida_free(&gman->gmr_ida, id);
> + ttm_resource_fini(man, *res);
> kfree(*res);
> return -ENOSPC;
> }
> @@ -130,6 +131,7 @@ static void vmw_gmrid_man_put_node(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> spin_lock(&gman->lock);
> gman->used_gmr_pages -= res->num_pages;
> spin_unlock(&gman->lock);
> + ttm_resource_fini(man, res);
> kfree(res);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_system_manager.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_system_manager.c
> index b0005b03a617..a64188c7268d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_system_manager.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_system_manager.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ static int vmw_sys_man_alloc(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> static void vmw_sys_man_free(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> struct ttm_resource *res)
> {
> + ttm_resource_fini(man, res);
> kfree(res);
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h
> index 5952051091cd..df1f06b7b504 100644
> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h
> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.h
> @@ -261,6 +261,9 @@ ttm_resource_manager_cleanup(struct ttm_resource_manager *man)
> void ttm_resource_init(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> const struct ttm_place *place,
> struct ttm_resource *res);
> +void ttm_resource_fini(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> + struct ttm_resource *res);
> +
> int ttm_resource_alloc(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> const struct ttm_place *place,
> struct ttm_resource **res);
With the i915 code fix and kerneldoc added:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list