[PATCH 04/32] drm/i915: gvt: fix kernel-doc trivial warnings

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab]

On 7/12/22 07:00, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> On 2022.07.11 21:24:49 +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Some functions seem to have been renamed without updating the kernel-doc
>> markup causing warnings. Also, struct intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj is not
>> properly documented, but has a kerneld-doc markup.
>>
>> Fix those warnings:
>> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/aperture_gm.c:308: warning: expecting prototype for inte_gvt_free_vgpu_resource(). Prototype was for intel_vgpu_free_resource() instead
>> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/aperture_gm.c:344: warning: expecting prototype for intel_alloc_vgpu_resource(). Prototype was for intel_vgpu_alloc_resource() instead
>> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/cfg_space.c:257: warning: expecting prototype for intel_vgpu_emulate_cfg_read(). Prototype was for intel_vgpu_emulate_cfg_write() instead
>> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.h:61: warning: Function parameter or member 'vgpu' not described in 'intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj'
>> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.h:61: warning: Function parameter or member 'info' not described in 'intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj'
>> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.h:61: warning: Function parameter or member 'dmabuf_id' not described in 'intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj'
>> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.h:61: warning: Function parameter or member 'kref' not described in 'intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj'
>> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.h:61: warning: Function parameter or member 'initref' not described in 'intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj'
>> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/dmabuf.h:61: warning: Function parameter or member 'list' not described in 'intel_vgpu_dmabuf_obj'
>> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/handlers.c:3066: warning: expecting prototype for intel_t_default_mmio_write(). Prototype was for intel_vgpu_default_mmio_write() instead
>> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/mmio_context.c:560: warning: expecting prototype for intel_gvt_switch_render_mmio(). Prototype was for intel_gvt_switch_mmio() instead
>> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/page_track.c:131: warning: expecting prototype for intel_vgpu_enable_page_track(). Prototype was for intel_vgpu_disable_page_track() instead
>> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c:215: warning: expecting prototype for intel_gvt_active_vgpu(). Prototype was for intel_gvt_activate_vgpu() instead
>> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c:230: warning: expecting prototype for intel_gvt_deactive_vgpu(). Prototype was for intel_gvt_deactivate_vgpu() instead
>> 	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c:358: warning: expecting prototype for intel_gvt_destroy_vgpu(). Prototype was for intel_gvt_destroy_idle_vgpu() instead
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab at kernel.org>
>> ---
> Hi, thanks for this, but there're already several fixes in queue right now, e.g
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/104302/ and
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/104640/, but looks there're other uncaught issues.
> I'd like to submit current in queue first, then maybe you could update for others?

Yeah, either that or I can simply apply those 3 patches before my series,
renaming the subject (as they all have the same one), and re-submit with
them inside.

Regards,
Mauro