[PATCH v1] drm/scheduler: Don't kill jobs in interrupt context
Alex Deucher
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Thu Jul 14 21:16:56 UTC 2022
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 1:58 PM Andrey Grodzovsky
<andrey.grodzovsky at amd.com> wrote:
>
> On 2022-07-14 12:22, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 10:14 AM Andrey Grodzovsky
> > <andrey.grodzovsky at amd.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2022-07-14 05:57, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>> On 7/12/22 11:56, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>>> On 7/6/22 18:46, Alex Deucher wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 9:49 AM Andrey Grodzovsky
> >>>>> <andrey.grodzovsky at amd.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2022-07-06 03:07, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hello Andrey,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 5/17/22 17:48, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 5/17/22 17:13, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Done.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Andrey
> >>>>>>>> Awesome, thank you!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Given that this drm-scheduler issue needs to be fixed in the 5.19-RC and
> >>>>>>> earlier, shouldn't it be in the drm-fixes and not in drm-next?
> >>>>>> I pushed it into drm-misc from where it got into drm-next. I don't have
> >>>>>> permission for drm-fixes.
> >>>>> The -fixes branch of drm-misc.
> >>>> Now I don't see the scheduler bugfix neither in the -fixes branch nor in
> >>>> the -next and today Dave sent out 5.19-rc7 pull request without the
> >>>> scheduler fix. Could anyone please check what is going on with the DRM
> >>>> patches? Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ffreedesktop%2Fdrm-misc%2Fcommits%2Fdrm-misc-fixes&data=05%7C01%7Candrey.grodzovsky%40amd.com%7Cd62c2e6d3ec748cd639608da65b52548%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637934125954377887%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WPmMC%2B%2Fy83cUctuF%2FLNo9VhWnB%2FkpUVQotMh74VshB8%3D&reserved=0
> >>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcgit.freedesktop.org%2Fdrm%2Fdrm-misc%2Flog%2F%3Fh%3Ddrm-misc-fixes&data=05%7C01%7Candrey.grodzovsky%40amd.com%7Cd62c2e6d3ec748cd639608da65b52548%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637934125954377887%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=RzCMLUYLmUjSmvDm4E%2FJr%2B5rp7E8UvjFt1tmwBoBiVc%3D&reserved=0
> >>> The patch is in the drm-misc-next-fixes, so it wasn't moved to the
> >>> drm-misc-fixes.
> >>>
> >>> Andrey, don't you have access to drm-misc-fixes? Or you meant
> >>> drm-fixes=drm-misc-fixes?
> >>
> >> I have only accesses to drm-misc-next to which I pushed this patch.
> > anyone with drm-misc rights can commit to any of the branches in the
> > drm-misc tree. You just need to check out and push the appropriate
> > branch. then push the changes. E.g.,
> > dim push-branch drm-misc-next
> > vs
> > dim push-branch drm-misc-next-fixes
> > etc.
> >
> > Alex
>
>
> I see, but what is the reason then that Dave sent out 5.19-rc7 pull
> request without the
> scheduler fix if the patch was merged into drm-misc-next long ago ? All
> the changes from
> there are usually picked up for pull requests, no ?
drm-misc-next is for new stuff for the next kernel (e.g., 5.20).
drm-misc-fixes is for fixes for the current kernel cycle (e.g., 5.19).
See:
https://drm.pages.freedesktop.org/maintainer-tools/drm-misc.html
Alex
>
> Andrey
>
>
> >
> >
> >> Andrey
> >>
> >>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list