[PATCH v3 2/6] dt-bindings: Use new video interface bus type macros in examples

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Sakari,

On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 12:28:45PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 01:14:06AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Now that a header exists with macros for the media interface bus-type
> > values, replace hardcoding numerical constants with the corresponding
> > macros in the DT binding examples.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since v2:
> > 
> > - Go back to PARALLEL
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> > 
> > - Rename PARALLEL to BT601
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix,anx7625.yaml  | 1 +
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/mipi-ccs.yaml     | 3 ++-
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov772x.yaml  | 3 ++-
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/media/marvell,mmp2-ccic.yaml          | 3 ++-
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/microchip,xisc.yaml   | 3 ++-
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/st,stm32-dcmi.yaml    | 4 +++-
> >  6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix,anx7625.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix,anx7625.yaml
> > index 35a48515836e..b0e5585f93e2 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix,anx7625.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/analogix,anx7625.yaml
> > @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ additionalProperties: false
> >  examples:
> >    - |
> >      #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/media/video-interfaces.h>
> >  
> >      i2c0 {
> >          #address-cells = <1>;
> 
> The definition doesn't seem to be used here. Is there a need to include
> this?

There was, but the change that added bus-type to this binding got
reverted in commit 979452fbc430 ("dt-bindings: drm/bridge: anx7625:
Revert DPI support") and I forgot to drop the header when rebasing.

> I could drop this chunk while applying. There's just one trivial change
> elsewhere in this patch to make.

Please do :-)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart