[PATCH v16 0/3] eDP/DP Phy vdda realted function
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Thu Jul 21 11:20:23 UTC 2022
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 12:31:41PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
If you're copying someone into a thread that's not obviously relevant
for them it's good practice to put a note about it at the top of the
mail to reduce the chances that it just gets deleted unread - people get
copies of all sorts of random stuff for not great reasons (like getting
pulled in by checkpatch due to once having done a cleanup) and are often
quicky to delete things.
> This series breaks USB and PCIe for some SC8280XP and SA540P machines
> where the DP PHY regulators are shared with other PHYs whose drivers do
> not request a load.
> Specifically, the hard-coded vdda-phy load of 21.8 mA added by this
> series, causes several RPMh regulators to now be put in low-power mode.
> I found Doug's suggestion to handle situations like this in regulator
> core:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20180814170617.100087-1-dianders@chromium.org/
> but since that was rejected, how do we deal with this generally?
> In the above thread Doug mentioned adding support for load requests to
> further drivers and Bjorn mentioned working around it by adding
> regulator-system-load properties to DT.
> It seems quite likely that changes like this one affects other systems
> too, and the effects may be hard to debug. So a more general solution
> than playing whack-a-mole using DT would be good to have.
You could add a way to specify constant base loads in DT on either a per
regulator or per consumer basis.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20220721/22d66d05/attachment.sig>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list