[PATCH v6 07/13] mfd: mt6370: Add MediaTek MT6370 support

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 10:30 AM ChiaEn Wu <peterwu.pub at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 4:00 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko at gmail.com> wrote:

...

> > > +#define MT6370_REG_DEV_INFO    0x100
> > > +#define MT6370_REG_CHG_IRQ1    0x1C0
> > > +#define MT6370_REG_CHG_MASK1   0x1E0
> > > +
> > > +#define MT6370_VENID_MASK      GENMASK(7, 4)
> > > +
> > > +#define MT6370_NUM_IRQREGS     16
> > > +#define MT6370_USBC_I2CADDR    0x4E
> >
> > > +#define MT6370_REG_ADDRLEN     2
> > > +#define MT6370_REG_MAXADDR     0x1FF
> >
> > These two more logically to have near to other _REG_* definitions above.
>
> Hi Andy,
> Thanks for your review.
> Do you mean that we should move '#define MT6370_USBC_I2CADDR' and
> '#define MT6370_REG_MAXADDR' after the line '#define
> MT6370_REG_CHG_MASK1'?
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> #define MT6370_REG_DEV_INFO    0x100
> #define MT6370_REG_CHG_IRQ1    0x1C0
> #define MT6370_REG_CHG_MASK1   0x1E0
> #define MT6370_USBC_I2CADDR    0x4E
> #define MT6370_REG_MAXADDR     0x1FF
>
> #define MT6370_VENID_MASK      GENMASK(7, 4)
>
> #define MT6370_NUM_IRQREGS     16
> #define MT6370_REG_ADDRLEN     2
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Like this?

You lost me. Namespace has a meaning, i.e. grouping items of a kind.
In your proposal I don't see that. If REG_MAXADDR and REG_ADDRLEN are
_not_ of the _REG_ kind as per above, why do they have this namespace
in the first place?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko