[PATCH] drm/display: drop unexpected word "the" in the comments

[蒋健]

I got the list as follow:
 ~/linux-kernel/linux-next  on master ⇡1  ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl 0001-drm-display-Remove-duplicate-the-in-two-places.patch
David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie> (maintainer:DRM DRIVERS)
Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> (maintainer:DRM DRIVERS)
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com> (commit_signer:8/21=38%,authored:5/21=24%)
Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> (commit_signer:7/21=33%,authored:2/21=10%)
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> (commit_signer:5/21=24%,authored:5/21=24%)
Douglas Anderson <dianders at chromium.org> (commit_signer:5/21=24%,authored:3/21=14%)
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> (commit_signer:5/21=24%)
Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com> (authored:2/21=10%)
dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org (open list:DRM DRIVERS)
linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org (open list)


Submit patch CMD as follow:
"git send-email 0001-drm-display-Remove-duplicate-the-in-two-places.patch --to airlied at linux.ie,daniel at ffwll.ch --cc jani.nikula at intel.com,lyude at redhat.com,tzimmermann at suse.de,dianders at chromium.org,ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com,imre.deak at intel.com,dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org,linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org "



 
------------------ Original ------------------
From:  "蒋健"<jiangjian at cdjrlc.com>;
Date:  Wed, Jun 22, 2022 02:47 AM
To:  "Lyude Paul"<lyude at redhat.com>; "airlied"<airlied at linux.ie>; "daniel"<daniel at ffwll.ch>; 
Cc:  "jani.nikula"<jani.nikula at intel.com>; "ville.syrjala"<ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>; "tzimmermann"<tzimmermann at suse.de>; "dianders"<dianders at chromium.org>; "imre.deak"<imre.deak at intel.com>; "dri-devel"<dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org>; 
Subject:  Re: [PATCH] drm/display: drop unexpected word "the" in the comments

 

Okay,I will submit a new patch immediately.
 
发自我的企业微信 


 	----------Reply to Message----------
 	On Wed,Jun 22,2022 2:41 AM Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> wrote:
 	 		You can send it by adding email addresses to git send-email with the "--to foo at bar.net" argument. If it doesn't come up on patchwork the second try don't worry about it, I'll look and see if I can workaround it. TBH I'm not entirely sure why it didn't show up in the first place


On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 02:38 +0800, 蒋健 wrote:
I need resubmit a new patch,  how can i make sure dri-devel@  is explicitly？I got to:list by the script
 name of get_maintainer.pl.
Pls help me…

发自我的企业微信 



----------Reply to Message----------
On Wed,Jun 22,2022 2:07 AM Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> wrote:
Actually I hate to ask but could you resend this and the other patch that you
sent and make sure that dri-devel@ is explicitly in the to: list? For some
reason these patches don't seem to be coming up on patchwork

On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 13:54 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
> 
> Will push to the appropriate branch in a moment
> 
> On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 21:14 +0800, Jiang Jian wrote:
> > there is an unexpected word "the" in the comments that need to be dropped
> > 
> > file: drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> > line: 1600
> >   * Doesn't account the the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each
> > changed to
> >   * Doesn't account the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jiang Jian <jiangjian at cdjrlc.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> > index e7c22c2ca90c..499f75768523 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
> > @@ -1597,7 +1597,7 @@ static int drm_dp_aux_reply_duration(const struct
> > drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> >   * Calculate the length of the i2c transfer in usec, assuming
> >   * the i2c bus speed is as specified. Gives the the "worst"
> >   * case estimate, ie. successful while as long as possible.
> > - * Doesn't account the the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each
> > + * Doesn't account the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each
> >   * message includes a START, ADDRESS and STOP. Neither does it
> >   * account for additional random variables such as clock stretching.
> >   */
> 

-- 
Cheers,
 Lyude Paul (she/her)
 Software Engineer at Red Hat






-- 

Cheers,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20220622/8d62a424/attachment-0001.htm>