[PATCH v1 2/3] drm/msm/dp: decoupling dp->id out of dp controller_id at scxxxx_dp_cfg table

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2022-06-24 16:30:59)
>
> On 6/24/2022 4:12 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2022-06-24 15:53:45)
> >> MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_1 need to match to the index = 1 of sc7280_dp_cfg[] <== This is correct
> >>
> >> The problem is sc7280_dp_cfg[] have two entries since eDP place at index
> >> of MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_1.
> >>
> >> but .num_desc = 1  <== this said only have one entry at sc7280_dp_cfg[]
> >> table. Therefore eDP will never be found at for loop  at
> >> _dpu_kms_initialize_displayport().
> >>
> > Yes, but what else does the MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_1 need to match? Because
> > the intention of the previous commit was to make it so the order of
> > sc7280_dp_cfg couldn't be messed up and not match the
> > MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_1 value that lives in sc7280_intf[].
>
>
> at  _dpu_kms_initialize_displayport()
>
> > -             info.h_tile_instance[0] = i; <== assign i to become dp controller id, "i" is index of scxxxx_dp_cfg[]
>
> This what I mean MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_1 need to match to index = 1 of
> scxxxx_dp_cfg[].
>
> it it is not match, then MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_1 with match to different INTF.

I thought we matched the INTF instance by searching through
sc7280_intf[] for a matching MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_1 and then returning that
INTF number. See dpu_encoder_get_intf() and the caller.