[PATCH] i2c: at91: use dma safe buffers

[Christian König]

Am 04.03.22 um 09:43 schrieb Wolfram Sang:
>> I'm getting quite a bunch of unrelated mails because the regex is not the
>> best.
> I can imagine!
>
>> On the other hand the framework is used in a lot of drivers and I do want to
>> be notified when they mess with their interfaces.
> Sure thing. I am convinced the regex can be improved to ensure that to a
> high degree. I think it is also less work for you than asking people to
> rename their variable all the time :)

Well not all the time. It's just that you absolutely hit the nail on the 
head with the name.

The local variable for the DMA-buf handle is just nearly always named 
dma_buf or dmabuf in the drivers.

Christian.

>
>> Going to take a another look at that when I have time.
> Thank you!
>