[PATCH v6 1/5] drm/msm/disp/dpu1: set mdp clk to the maximum frequency in opp table during probe
Vinod Polimera
vpolimer at qti.qualcomm.com
Mon Mar 21 16:21:35 UTC 2022
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd at chromium.org>
> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2022 2:41 AM
> To: quic_vpolimer <quic_vpolimer at quicinc.com>;
> devicetree at vger.kernel.org; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org;
> freedreno at lists.freedesktop.org; linux-arm-msm at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; robdclark at gmail.com;
> dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org; dianders at chromium.org; quic_kalyant
> <quic_kalyant at quicinc.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] drm/msm/disp/dpu1: set mdp clk to the
> maximum frequency in opp table during probe
>
> WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary
> of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
>
> Quoting Vinod Polimera (2022-03-14 07:46:53)
> > use max clock during probe/bind sequence from the opp table.
> > The clock will be scaled down when framework sends an update.
>
> Capitalize 'use'.
>
> Why is it important to use max frequency during probe/bind? Does not
> setting the clk rate during probe mean that we'll never use the max
> rate? Does it speed things up during probe?
We need to vote mdp clock during probe/bind so that rails are not set at undetermined state as pointed out by Dmitry.
Since we dont know what will be the rate set in boot loader, it would be ideal to vote at max frequency.
There could be a firmware display programmed in bootloader and we want to transition it to kernel without underflowing.
Thanks,
Vinod P.
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list