[PATCH v11 2/7] MIPS: Loongson64: dts: introduce ls3A4000 evaluation board

[Jiaxun Yang]

在2022年3月23日三月 上午3:07，Sui Jingfeng写道：
> On 2022/3/23 10:29, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2022/3/23 1:53, Sui Jingfeng 写道:
>>> Hi, Jiaxun
>>>
>>> Build all dts into vmlinuz will make the vmlinuz bigger and bigger.
>>> How does the kernel get the dtb is another big issue, either from 
>>> built-in
>>> dtb or pass from the firmware(pmon and uefi etc). This should be
>>> solved with another patch carefully. Providing board specific dts
>>> helps to code review, it helps reviewers understand that there are
>>> variant boards and have to be express with different OF graph.
>> Hi,
>>
>> I insist my taste on those code. If the only intention is to demonstrate
>> the usage of the driver then please just leave them in dt document
>> or commit message.
>>
>>>
>>> Now, there are about 6 dts under arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/,
>>> Suppose loongson have 1000+ different board, do you want built all
>>> of them into vmlinuz?
>> Note that we are supporting all those boards on "platform" bias. Which
>> means if they share similar design then they will use the same DTS.
>> If we have a new design then unfortunately our kernel binary must grow.
>>
>> For those who intended to build a size-optimized kernel they will be
>> able to disable unused DTS in Kconfig.
>>
>> If you want to blame somebody for the problem then please don't
>> blame us. We tried very hard to fit all those stuff into kernel's model
>> of devices. You should blame those who did the initial design of
>> Loongson's boot interface that failed to introduce a proper way
>> to describe the platform.
>>
>>>
>>> Besides, ls7a1000 and ls2k1000 lack a i2c driver, gpio driver,
>>> pwm driver, clk driver, can you pay more attention to salve those
>>> problems, please ?
>> Are you trying to make a TODO list for your colleague :-)
>>
>> We , community developers, don't owe you anything. So please
>> don't expect anything from us. I lost access to most Loongson
>> devices since I'm currently study abroad, but I'm determined to
>> keep platform code in a good shape. That's my duty as a maintainer.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> - Jiaxun
>
> Providing a few board specific dts doesn't hurt anybody.

There are a lot of things that don't hurt anybody but we shouldn't do.

The standard of reviewing the code is not "doesn't hurt anybody". It's "do the right thing".

Please reference:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/6.Followthrough.html

>
> Can we leave the problem(passing correct dts to the kernel) untouched and
>
> solve it in the feature with a another patch, ok?

Then please drop platform DTS part.

I must NAK this part, sorry.

Thanks
-- 
- Jiaxun