[PATCH 2/2] dma-buf/sync-file: fix warning about fence containers
Christian König
ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Fri Mar 25 10:35:49 UTC 2022
Am 25.03.22 um 11:13 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 12:02:44PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
>> The dma_fence_chain containers can show up in sync_files as well resulting in
>> warnings that those can't be added to dma_fence_array containers when merging
>> multiple sync_files together.
>>
>> Solve this by using the dma_fence_unwrap iterator to deep dive into the
>> contained fences and then add those flatten out into a dma_fence_array.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> I have no idea why we try to keep fences sorted, but oh well it looks like
> the merging is done correctly.
To be honest I don't fully know either.
Keeping the array sorted by context allows to merge it without adding
duplicates, but adding duplicates is not an extra overhead to begin with
because we always allocate memory for the worst case anyway.
Just keeping it around for now.
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Thanks,
Christian.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c | 141 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>> 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c b/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
>> index 394e6e1e9686..b8dea4ec123b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c
>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>> * Copyright (C) 2012 Google, Inc.
>> */
>>
>> +#include <linux/dma-fence-unwrap.h>
>> #include <linux/export.h>
>> #include <linux/file.h>
>> #include <linux/fs.h>
>> @@ -172,20 +173,6 @@ static int sync_file_set_fence(struct sync_file *sync_file,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static struct dma_fence **get_fences(struct sync_file *sync_file,
>> - int *num_fences)
>> -{
>> - if (dma_fence_is_array(sync_file->fence)) {
>> - struct dma_fence_array *array = to_dma_fence_array(sync_file->fence);
>> -
>> - *num_fences = array->num_fences;
>> - return array->fences;
>> - }
>> -
>> - *num_fences = 1;
>> - return &sync_file->fence;
>> -}
>> -
>> static void add_fence(struct dma_fence **fences,
>> int *i, struct dma_fence *fence)
>> {
>> @@ -210,86 +197,97 @@ static void add_fence(struct dma_fence **fences,
>> static struct sync_file *sync_file_merge(const char *name, struct sync_file *a,
>> struct sync_file *b)
>> {
>> + struct dma_fence *a_fence, *b_fence, **fences;
>> + struct dma_fence_unwrap a_iter, b_iter;
>> + unsigned int index, num_fences;
>> struct sync_file *sync_file;
>> - struct dma_fence **fences = NULL, **nfences, **a_fences, **b_fences;
>> - int i = 0, i_a, i_b, num_fences, a_num_fences, b_num_fences;
>>
>> sync_file = sync_file_alloc();
>> if (!sync_file)
>> return NULL;
>>
>> - a_fences = get_fences(a, &a_num_fences);
>> - b_fences = get_fences(b, &b_num_fences);
>> - if (a_num_fences > INT_MAX - b_num_fences)
>> - goto err;
>> + num_fences = 0;
>> + dma_fence_unwrap_for_each(a_fence, &a_iter, a->fence)
>> + ++num_fences;
>> + dma_fence_unwrap_for_each(b_fence, &b_iter, b->fence)
>> + ++num_fences;
>>
>> - num_fences = a_num_fences + b_num_fences;
>> + if (num_fences > INT_MAX)
>> + goto err_free_sync_file;
>>
>> fences = kcalloc(num_fences, sizeof(*fences), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!fences)
>> - goto err;
>> + goto err_free_sync_file;
>>
>> /*
>> - * Assume sync_file a and b are both ordered and have no
>> - * duplicates with the same context.
>> + * We can't guarantee that fences in both a and b are ordered, but it is
>> + * still quite likely.
>> *
>> - * If a sync_file can only be created with sync_file_merge
>> - * and sync_file_create, this is a reasonable assumption.
>> + * So attempt to order the fences as we pass over them and merge fences
>> + * with the same context.
>> */
>> - for (i_a = i_b = 0; i_a < a_num_fences && i_b < b_num_fences; ) {
>> - struct dma_fence *pt_a = a_fences[i_a];
>> - struct dma_fence *pt_b = b_fences[i_b];
>>
>> - if (pt_a->context < pt_b->context) {
>> - add_fence(fences, &i, pt_a);
>> + index = 0;
>> + for (a_fence = dma_fence_unwrap_first(a->fence, &a_iter),
>> + b_fence = dma_fence_unwrap_first(b->fence, &b_iter);
>> + a_fence || b_fence; ) {
>> +
>> + if (!b_fence) {
>> + add_fence(fences, &index, a_fence);
>> + a_fence = dma_fence_unwrap_next(&a_iter);
>> +
>> + } else if (!a_fence) {
>> + add_fence(fences, &index, b_fence);
>> + b_fence = dma_fence_unwrap_next(&b_iter);
>> +
>> + } else if (a_fence->context < b_fence->context) {
>> + add_fence(fences, &index, a_fence);
>> + a_fence = dma_fence_unwrap_next(&a_iter);
>>
>> - i_a++;
>> - } else if (pt_a->context > pt_b->context) {
>> - add_fence(fences, &i, pt_b);
>> + } else if (b_fence->context < a_fence->context) {
>> + add_fence(fences, &index, b_fence);
>> + b_fence = dma_fence_unwrap_next(&b_iter);
>> +
>> + } else if (__dma_fence_is_later(a_fence->seqno, b_fence->seqno,
>> + a_fence->ops)) {
>> + add_fence(fences, &index, a_fence);
>> + a_fence = dma_fence_unwrap_next(&a_iter);
>> + b_fence = dma_fence_unwrap_next(&b_iter);
>>
>> - i_b++;
>> } else {
>> - if (__dma_fence_is_later(pt_a->seqno, pt_b->seqno,
>> - pt_a->ops))
>> - add_fence(fences, &i, pt_a);
>> - else
>> - add_fence(fences, &i, pt_b);
>> -
>> - i_a++;
>> - i_b++;
>> + add_fence(fences, &index, b_fence);
>> + a_fence = dma_fence_unwrap_next(&a_iter);
>> + b_fence = dma_fence_unwrap_next(&b_iter);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - for (; i_a < a_num_fences; i_a++)
>> - add_fence(fences, &i, a_fences[i_a]);
>> -
>> - for (; i_b < b_num_fences; i_b++)
>> - add_fence(fences, &i, b_fences[i_b]);
>> -
>> - if (i == 0)
>> - fences[i++] = dma_fence_get(a_fences[0]);
>> + if (index == 0)
>> + add_fence(fences, &index, dma_fence_get_stub());
>>
>> - if (num_fences > i) {
>> - nfences = krealloc_array(fences, i, sizeof(*fences), GFP_KERNEL);
>> - if (!nfences)
>> - goto err;
>> + if (num_fences > index) {
>> + struct dma_fence **tmp;
>>
>> - fences = nfences;
>> + /* Keep going even when reducing the size failed */
>> + tmp = krealloc_array(fences, index, sizeof(*fences),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (tmp)
>> + fences = tmp;
>> }
>>
>> - if (sync_file_set_fence(sync_file, fences, i) < 0)
>> - goto err;
>> + if (sync_file_set_fence(sync_file, fences, index) < 0)
>> + goto err_put_fences;
>>
>> strlcpy(sync_file->user_name, name, sizeof(sync_file->user_name));
>> return sync_file;
>>
>> -err:
>> - while (i)
>> - dma_fence_put(fences[--i]);
>> +err_put_fences:
>> + while (index)
>> + dma_fence_put(fences[--index]);
>> kfree(fences);
>> +
>> +err_free_sync_file:
>> fput(sync_file->file);
>> return NULL;
>> -
>> }
>>
>> static int sync_file_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>> @@ -398,11 +396,13 @@ static int sync_fill_fence_info(struct dma_fence *fence,
>> static long sync_file_ioctl_fence_info(struct sync_file *sync_file,
>> unsigned long arg)
>> {
>> - struct sync_file_info info;
>> struct sync_fence_info *fence_info = NULL;
>> - struct dma_fence **fences;
>> + struct dma_fence_unwrap iter;
>> + struct sync_file_info info;
>> + unsigned int num_fences;
>> + struct dma_fence *fence;
>> + int ret;
>> __u32 size;
>> - int num_fences, ret, i;
>>
>> if (copy_from_user(&info, (void __user *)arg, sizeof(info)))
>> return -EFAULT;
>> @@ -410,7 +410,9 @@ static long sync_file_ioctl_fence_info(struct sync_file *sync_file,
>> if (info.flags || info.pad)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - fences = get_fences(sync_file, &num_fences);
>> + num_fences = 0;
>> + dma_fence_unwrap_for_each(fence, &iter, sync_file->fence)
>> + ++num_fences;
>>
>> /*
>> * Passing num_fences = 0 means that userspace doesn't want to
>> @@ -433,8 +435,11 @@ static long sync_file_ioctl_fence_info(struct sync_file *sync_file,
>> if (!fence_info)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < num_fences; i++) {
>> - int status = sync_fill_fence_info(fences[i], &fence_info[i]);
>> + num_fences = 0;
>> + dma_fence_unwrap_for_each(fence, &iter, sync_file->fence) {
>> + int status;
>> +
>> + status = sync_fill_fence_info(fence, &fence_info[num_fences++]);
>> info.status = info.status <= 0 ? info.status : status;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list