[PATCH v2 00/12] iio: buffer-dma: write() and new DMABUF based API
Paul Cercueil
paul at crapouillou.net
Tue Mar 29 09:11:14 UTC 2022
Hi Daniel,
Le mar., mars 29 2022 at 10:33:32 +0200, Daniel Vetter
<daniel at ffwll.ch> a écrit :
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 05:43:35PM +0000, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>> Le dim., févr. 13 2022 at 18:46:16 +0000, Jonathan Cameron
>> <jic23 at kernel.org> a écrit :
>> > On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 12:59:21 +0000
>> > Paul Cercueil <paul at crapouillou.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Jonathan,
>> > >
>> > > This is the V2 of my patchset that introduces a new userspace
>> > > interface
>> > > based on DMABUF objects to complement the fileio API, and adds
>> > > write()
>> > > support to the existing fileio API.
>> >
>> > Hi Paul,
>> >
>> > It's been a little while. Perhaps you could summarize the various
>> view
>> > points around the appropriateness of using DMABUF for this?
>> > I appreciate it is a tricky topic to distil into a brief summary
>> but
>> > I know I would find it useful even if no one else does!
>>
>> So we want to have a high-speed interface where buffers of samples
>> are
>> passed around between IIO devices and other devices (e.g. USB or
>> network),
>> or made available to userspace without copying the data.
>>
>> DMABUF is, at least in theory, exactly what we need. Quoting the
>> documentation
>> (https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.15/driver-api/dma-buf.html):
>> "The dma-buf subsystem provides the framework for sharing buffers
>> for
>> hardware (DMA) access across multiple device drivers and
>> subsystems, and for
>> synchronizing asynchronous hardware access. This is used, for
>> example, by
>> drm “prime” multi-GPU support, but is of course not limited to
>> GPU use
>> cases."
>>
>> The problem is that right now DMABUF is only really used by DRM,
>> and to
>> quote Daniel, "dma-buf looks like something super generic and
>> useful, until
>> you realize that there's a metric ton of gpu/accelerator bagage
>> piled in".
>>
>> Still, it seems to be the only viable option. We could add a custom
>> buffer-passing interface, but that would mean implementing the same
>> buffer-passing interface on the network and USB stacks, and before
>> we know
>> it we re-invented DMABUFs.
>
> dma-buf also doesn't support sharing with network and usb stacks, so
> I'm a
> bit confused why exactly this is useful?
There is an attempt to get dma-buf support in the network stack, called
"zctap". Last patchset was sent last november. USB stack does not
support dma-buf, but we can add it later I guess.
> So yeah unless there's some sharing going on with gpu stuff (for data
> processing maybe) I'm not sure this makes a lot of sense really. Or at
> least some zero-copy sharing between drivers, but even that would
> minimally require a dma-buf import ioctl of some sorts. Which I either
> missed or doesn't exist.
We do want zero-copy between drivers, the network stack, and the USB
stack. It's not just about having a userspace interface.
> If there's none of that then just hand-roll your buffer handling code
> (xarray is cheap to use in terms of code for this), you can always add
> dma-buf import/export later on when the need arises.
>
> Scrolling through patches you only have dma-buf export, but no
> importing,
> so the use-case that works is with one of the existing subsystems that
> supporting dma-buf importing.
>
> I think minimally we need the use-case (in form of code) that needs
> the
> buffer sharing here.
I'll try with zctap and report back.
Cheers,
-Paul
>> > >
>> > > Changes since v1:
>> > >
>> > > - the patches that were merged in v1 have been (obviously)
>> dropped
>> > > from
>> > > this patchset;
>> > > - the patch that was setting the write-combine cache setting
>> has
>> > > been
>> > > dropped as well, as it was simply not useful.
>> > > - [01/12]:
>> > > * Only remove the outgoing queue, and keep the incoming
>> queue,
>> > > as we
>> > > want the buffer to start streaming data as soon as it is
>> > > enabled.
>> > > * Remove IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DEQUEUED, since it is now
>> functionally
>> > > the
>> > > same as IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DONE.
>> > > - [02/12]:
>> > > * Fix block->state not being reset in
>> > > iio_dma_buffer_request_update() for output buffers.
>> > > * Only update block->bytes_used once and add a comment
>> about
>> > > why we
>> > > update it.
>> > > * Add a comment about why we're setting a different state
>> for
>> > > output
>> > > buffers in iio_dma_buffer_request_update()
>> > > * Remove useless cast to bool (!!) in iio_dma_buffer_io()
>> > > - [05/12]:
>> > > Only allow the new IOCTLs on the buffer FD created with
>> > > IIO_BUFFER_GET_FD_IOCTL().
>> > > - [12/12]:
>> > > * Explicitly state that the new interface is optional and
>> is
>> > > not implemented by all drivers.
>> > > * The IOCTLs can now only be called on the buffer FD
>> returned by
>> > > IIO_BUFFER_GET_FD_IOCTL.
>> > > * Move the page up a bit in the index since it is core
>> stuff
>> > > and not
>> > > driver-specific.
>> > >
>> > > The patches not listed here have not been modified since v1.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > -Paul
>> > >
>> > > Alexandru Ardelean (1):
>> > > iio: buffer-dma: split iio_dma_buffer_fileio_free() function
>> > >
>> > > Paul Cercueil (11):
>> > > iio: buffer-dma: Get rid of outgoing queue
>> > > iio: buffer-dma: Enable buffer write support
>> > > iio: buffer-dmaengine: Support specifying buffer direction
>> > > iio: buffer-dmaengine: Enable write support
>> > > iio: core: Add new DMABUF interface infrastructure
>> > > iio: buffer-dma: Use DMABUFs instead of custom solution
>> > > iio: buffer-dma: Implement new DMABUF based userspace API
>> > > iio: buffer-dmaengine: Support new DMABUF based userspace API
>> > > iio: core: Add support for cyclic buffers
>> > > iio: buffer-dmaengine: Add support for cyclic buffers
>> > > Documentation: iio: Document high-speed DMABUF based API
>> > >
>> > > Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst | 2 +
>> > > Documentation/iio/dmabuf_api.rst | 94 +++
>> > > Documentation/iio/index.rst | 2 +
>> > > drivers/iio/adc/adi-axi-adc.c | 3 +-
>> > > drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c | 610
>> > > ++++++++++++++----
>> > > .../buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c | 42 +-
>> > > drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 60 ++
>> > > include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h | 38 +-
>> > > include/linux/iio/buffer-dmaengine.h | 5 +-
>> > > include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h | 8 +
>> > > include/uapi/linux/iio/buffer.h | 30 +
>> > > 11 files changed, 749 insertions(+), 145 deletions(-)
>> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/iio/dmabuf_api.rst
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list