[PATCH] drm/dp_mst: Lower down debug info level when receive NAK

[Harry Wentland]

On 2022-03-29 04:05, Wayne Lin wrote:
> [Why]
> It's reasonable that we receive NAK while doing DP_REMOTE_DPCD_READ.
> Downstream device might reply NAK with the reason and source should
> react accordingly.
> 
> e.g.
> 1. When downstream device can't handle corresponding message in time,
> it then replies NAK as reason been set as DEFER.
> 2. When multi-function branch-sink device doesn't enumerate virtual
> DP peer devices for those multi-function down facing ports. Without
> virtual DPCD, branch device might reply NAK with reason as BAD_PARAM
> indicating this port can't do aux DPCD read.
> 
> It's expected result. Not an error.
> 
> [How]
> Use drm_dbg_kms() to replace drm_err() when receive NAK.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin at amd.com>

Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland at amd.com>

Harry

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/dp/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/dp/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/dp/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> index 11300b53d24f..764a6b59bc1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/dp/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/dp/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> @@ -3557,9 +3557,8 @@ static int drm_dp_send_dpcd_read(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto fail_free;
>  
> -	/* DPCD read should never be NACKed */
>  	if (txmsg->reply.reply_type == 1) {
> -		drm_err(mgr->dev, "mstb %p port %d: DPCD read on addr 0x%x for %d bytes NAKed\n",
> +		drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev, "mstb %p port %d: DPCD read on addr 0x%x for %d bytes NAKed\n",
>  			mstb, port->port_num, offset, size);
>  		ret = -EIO;
>  		goto fail_free;