[PATCH v6 1/8] drm/msm/dp: Add eDP support via aux_bus
Dmitry Baryshkov
dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org
Wed Mar 30 23:19:37 UTC 2022
On 30/03/2022 19:02, Sankeerth Billakanti wrote:
> This patch adds support for generic eDP sink through aux_bus. The eDP/DP
> controller driver should support aux transactions originating from the
> panel-edp driver and hence should be initialized and ready.
>
> The panel bridge supporting the panel should be ready before the bridge
> connector is initialized. The generic panel probe needs the controller
> resources to be enabled to support the aux transactions originating from
> the panel probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka at quicinc.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v6:
> - Remove initialization
> - Fix aux_bus node leak
> - Split the patches
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c | 10 ++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.c | 21 +--------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> index 382b3aa..e082d02 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include <linux/component.h>
> #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <drm/dp/drm_dp_aux_bus.h>
>
> #include "msm_drv.h"
> #include "msm_kms.h"
> @@ -265,8 +266,6 @@ static int dp_display_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
> goto end;
> }
>
> - dp->dp_display.next_bridge = dp->parser->next_bridge;
> -
> dp->aux->drm_dev = drm;
> rc = dp_aux_register(dp->aux);
> if (rc) {
> @@ -1524,6 +1523,53 @@ void msm_dp_debugfs_init(struct msm_dp *dp_display, struct drm_minor *minor)
> }
> }
>
> +static int dp_display_get_next_bridge(struct msm_dp *dp)
> +{
> + int rc;
> + struct dp_display_private *dp_priv;
> + struct device_node *aux_bus;
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + dp_priv = container_of(dp, struct dp_display_private, dp_display);
> + dev = &dp_priv->pdev->dev;
> + aux_bus = of_get_child_by_name(dev->of_node, "aux-bus");
> +
> + if (aux_bus) {
> + dp_display_host_init(dp_priv);
> + dp_catalog_ctrl_hpd_config(dp_priv->catalog);
> + enable_irq(dp_priv->irq);
> + dp_display_host_phy_init(dp_priv);
> +
> + devm_of_dp_aux_populate_ep_devices(dp_priv->aux);
> +
> + disable_irq(dp_priv->irq);
> + of_node_put(aux_bus);
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * External bridges are mandatory for eDP interfaces: one has to
> + * provide at least an eDP panel (which gets wrapped into panel-bridge).
> + *
> + * For DisplayPort interfaces external bridges are optional, so
> + * silently ignore an error if one is not present (-ENODEV).
> + */
> + rc = dp_parser_find_next_bridge(dp_priv->parser);
> + if (rc == -ENODEV) {
> + if (dp->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP) {
The more I think about these conditions, the closer I dislike them (yes,
I added this one in one of the patches). I'd suggest to change
dp->connector_type to boolean 'is_edp' field use it in all conditions
instead.
> + DRM_ERROR("eDP: next bridge is not present\n");
> + return rc;
> + }
> + } else if (rc) {
> + if (rc != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + DRM_ERROR("DP: error parsing next bridge: %d\n", rc);
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + dp->next_bridge = dp_priv->parser->next_bridge;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int msm_dp_modeset_init(struct msm_dp *dp_display, struct drm_device *dev,
> struct drm_encoder *encoder)
> {
> @@ -1547,6 +1593,10 @@ int msm_dp_modeset_init(struct msm_dp *dp_display, struct drm_device *dev,
>
> dp_display->encoder = encoder;
>
> + ret = dp_display_get_next_bridge(dp_display);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> dp_display->bridge = dp_bridge_init(dp_display, dev, encoder);
> if (IS_ERR(dp_display->bridge)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(dp_display->bridge);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> index 7ce1aca..5254bd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> @@ -114,10 +114,12 @@ struct drm_bridge *dp_bridge_init(struct msm_dp *dp_display, struct drm_device *
> bridge->funcs = &dp_bridge_ops;
> bridge->type = dp_display->connector_type;
>
> - bridge->ops =
> - DRM_BRIDGE_OP_DETECT |
> - DRM_BRIDGE_OP_HPD |
> - DRM_BRIDGE_OP_MODES;
> + if (bridge->type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort) {
And in this case we can also check dp_display->connector_type (or the
suggested dp_display->is_edp) for the uniformity of the code.
> + bridge->ops =
> + DRM_BRIDGE_OP_DETECT |
> + DRM_BRIDGE_OP_HPD |
> + DRM_BRIDGE_OP_MODES;
I think OP_MODES should be used for eDP, shouldn't it?
> + }
>
> rc = drm_bridge_attach(encoder, bridge, NULL, DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR);
> if (rc) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.c
> index 1056b8d..6317dce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.c
> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static int dp_parser_clock(struct dp_parser *parser)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int dp_parser_find_next_bridge(struct dp_parser *parser)
> +int dp_parser_find_next_bridge(struct dp_parser *parser)
> {
> struct device *dev = &parser->pdev->dev;
> struct drm_bridge *bridge;
> @@ -300,25 +300,6 @@ static int dp_parser_parse(struct dp_parser *parser, int connector_type)
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
> - /*
> - * External bridges are mandatory for eDP interfaces: one has to
> - * provide at least an eDP panel (which gets wrapped into panel-bridge).
> - *
> - * For DisplayPort interfaces external bridges are optional, so
> - * silently ignore an error if one is not present (-ENODEV).
> - */
> - rc = dp_parser_find_next_bridge(parser);
> - if (rc == -ENODEV) {
> - if (connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP) {
> - DRM_ERROR("eDP: next bridge is not present\n");
> - return rc;
> - }
> - } else if (rc) {
> - if (rc != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> - DRM_ERROR("DP: error parsing next bridge: %d\n", rc);
> - return rc;
> - }
> -
> /* Map the corresponding regulator information according to
> * version. Currently, since we only have one supported platform,
> * mapping the regulator directly.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.h
> index d371bae..091ff41 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.h
> @@ -140,5 +140,6 @@ struct dp_parser {
> * can be parsed using this module.
> */
> struct dp_parser *dp_parser_get(struct platform_device *pdev);
> +int dp_parser_find_next_bridge(struct dp_parser *parser);
>
> #endif
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list