[PATCH v6 4/8] drm/msm/dp: avoid handling masked interrupts

Dmitry Baryshkov dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org
Thu Mar 31 10:10:27 UTC 2022


On 31/03/2022 08:53, Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC) wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 19:03, Sankeerth Billakanti
>> <quic_sbillaka at quicinc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The interrupt register will still reflect the connect and disconnect
>>> interrupt status without generating an actual HW interrupt.
>>> The controller driver should not handle those masked interrupts.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka at quicinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c | 5 +++--
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c
>>> index 3c16f95..1809ce2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c
>>> @@ -608,13 +608,14 @@ u32 dp_catalog_hpd_get_intr_status(struct
>>> dp_catalog *dp_catalog)  {
>>>          struct dp_catalog_private *catalog = container_of(dp_catalog,
>>>                                  struct dp_catalog_private, dp_catalog);
>>> -       int isr = 0;
>>> +       int isr, mask;
>>>
>>>          isr = dp_read_aux(catalog, REG_DP_DP_HPD_INT_STATUS);
>>>          dp_write_aux(catalog, REG_DP_DP_HPD_INT_ACK,
>>>                                   (isr & DP_DP_HPD_INT_MASK));
>>> +       mask = dp_read_aux(catalog, REG_DP_DP_HPD_INT_MASK);
>>>
>>> -       return isr;
>>> +       return isr & (DP_DP_HPD_STATE_STATUS_MASK | mask);
>>
>> I suspect that the logic is inverted here. Shouldn't it be:
>>
>> return isr & DP_DP_HPD_STATE_STATUS_MASK & mask;
>>
>> ?
>>
>   
> The value of DP_DP_HPD_STATE_STATUS_MASK is 0xE0000000 and the value of the read
> interrupt mask variable could be is 0xF.
> 
> The mask value is indicated via the register, REG_DP_DP_HPD_INT_MASK, bits 3:0.
> The HPD status is indicated via a different read-only register REG_DP_DP_HPD_INT_STATUS, bits 31:29.

I see. Maybe the following expression would be better?

return isr & (mask & ~DP_DP_HPD_INT_MASK);

> 
> isr & DP_DP_HPD_STATE_STATUS_MASK & mask, will return 0 always.
> 
>>>   }
>>>
>>>   int dp_catalog_ctrl_get_interrupt(struct dp_catalog *dp_catalog)
>>> --
>>> 2.7.4
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With best wishes
>> Dmitry
> 
> Thank you,
> Sankeerth


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry


More information about the dri-devel mailing list