[PATCH v5 7/7] fbdev: Make registered_fb[] private to fbmem.c

Sam Ravnborg sam at ravnborg.org
Thu May 12 18:32:14 UTC 2022


On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 07:34:38PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Guenter,
> 
> On 5/11/22 19:17, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 5/11/22 10:00, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> >>>   struct fb_info *registered_fb[FB_MAX] __read_mostly;
> >>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(registered_fb);
> >>> -
> >>>   int num_registered_fb __read_mostly;
> >>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FB_OLPC_DCON)
> >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(registered_fb);
> >>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(num_registered_fb);
> >>> +#endif
> >>
> >> It is stuff like this I refer to as "ugly" in the comment above.
> >>
> > 
> > My "solution" for that kind of thing is to use a namespace,
> > such as
> > 
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS(registered_fb, FB_OLPC_DCON);
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS(num_registered_fb, FB_OLPC_DCON);
> >
> 
> Using a namespace in this case is indeed a great idea I think.
> 
> I've used in the past to limit the export of a symbol for within a driver
> that could be scattered across different compilations units, but it never
> occurred to me using it to limit symbols exported by core code.
>  
> > and import it from the offending code. That avoids ifdefs
> > while at the same time limiting the use of the symbols
> > to the expected scope. Of course that could be abused but
> > that abuse would be obvious.
> >
> 
> Agreed. For the next revision, besides using an namespaced export symbol
> as you suggested, I'll include a comment to make clear that it shouldn't
> by any other driver and FB_OLPC_DCON fixed instead.
A very nice compromise, thanks Guenter and Javier.

	Sam


More information about the dri-devel mailing list