[PATCH v1 3/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450-hdk: enable display hardware

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 07/11/2022 11:46, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 06/11/2022 05:30, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 04:13:56PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> Enable MDSS/DPU/DSI0 on SM8450-HDK device. Note, there is no panel
>>> configuration (yet).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-hdk.dts | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-hdk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-hdk.dts
>>> index 38ccd44620d0..e1a4cf1ee51d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-hdk.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-hdk.dts
>>> @@ -442,3 +442,21 @@ &usb_1_qmpphy {
>>>   	vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l6b_1p2>;
>>>   	vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l1b_0p91>;
>>>   };
>>> +
>>> +&mdss {
>>> +	status = "okay";
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&mdss_mdp {
>>> +	status = "okay";
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&dsi0 {
>>
>> Please prefix the labels with "mdss_" so that you can keep them sorted
>> alphabetically.
> Why such a change all of a sudden? Only downstream (and sc7280 upstream) 
> has mdss_ prefixes for dsi. 

For keeping the nodes together - this makes review of code and patches
easier.

> Plain 'dsiN' is more generic.

And why the label should be generic? Label should be useful and
descriptive, although not too much, so mdss_dsi still fits in reasonable
choice.

Best regards,
Krzysztof