[PATCH v2 00/11] Connect VFIO to IOMMUFD

[Yang, Lixiao]

On 2022/11/14 20:51, Yi Liu wrote:
> On 2022/11/10 00:57, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 11:18:03PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote:
>>> On 2022/11/8 17:19, Nicolin Chen wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 08:52:44PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This is on github:
>>>>> https://github.com/jgunthorpe/linux/commits/vfio_iommufd
>>>> [...]
>>>>> v2:
>>>>>    - Rebase to v6.1-rc3, v4 iommufd series
>>>>>    - Fixup comments and commit messages from list remarks
>>>>>    - Fix leaking of the iommufd for mdevs
>>>>>    - New patch to fix vfio modaliases when vfio container is disabled
>>>>>    - Add a dmesg once when the iommufd provided /dev/vfio/vfio is opened
>>>>>      to signal that iommufd is providing this
>>>>
>>>> I've redone my previous sanity tests. Except those reported bugs, 
>>>> things look fine. Once we fix those issues, GVT and other modules 
>>>> can run some more stressful tests, I think.
>>>
>>> our side is also starting test (gvt, nic passthrough) this version. 
>>> need to wait a while for the result.
>>
>> I've updated the branches with the two functional fixes discussed on 
>> the list plus all the doc updates.
>>
>
> I see, due to timzone, the kernel we grabbed is 37c9e6e44d77a, it has 
> slight diff in the scripts/kernel-doc compared with the latest commit 
> (6bb16a9c67769). I don't think it impacts the test.
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgg/iommufd.git/log/?h=for-next
>   (37c9e6e44d77a)
>
> Our side, Yu He, Lixiao Yang has done below tests on Intel platform 
> with the above kernel, results are:
>
> 1) GVT-g test suit passed, Intel iGFx passthrough passed.
>
> 2) NIC passthrough test with different guest memory (1G/4G), passed.
>
> 3) Booting two different QEMUs in the same time but one QEMU opens 
> legacy /dev/vfio/vfio and another opens /dev/iommu. Tests passed.
>
> 4) Tried below Kconfig combinations, results are expected.
>
> VFIO_CONTAINER=y, IOMMUFD=y   -- test pass
> VFIO_CONTAINER=y, IOMMUFD=n   -- test pass
> VFIO_CONTAINER=n, IOMMUFD=y , IOMMUFD_VFIO_CONTAINER=y  -- test pass 
> VFIO_CONTAINER=n, IOMMUFD=y , IOMMUFD_VFIO_CONTAINER=n  -- no 
> /dev/vfio/vfio, so test fail, expected
>
> 5) Tested devices from multi-device group. Assign such devices to the 
> same VM, pass; assign them to different VMs, fail; assign them to a VM 
> with Intel virtual VT-d, fail; Results are expected.
>
> Meanwhile, I also tested the branch in development branch for nesting, 
> the basic functionality looks good.
>
> Tested-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu at intel.com>
>
Tested-by: Lixiao Yang <lixiao.yang at intel.com>

--
Regards,
Lixiao Yang