[PATCH v7 20/20] drm/i915/vm_bind: Async vm_unbind support

[Niranjana Vishwanathapura]

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 04:58:42PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote:
>Hi Niranjana,
>
>On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 11:57:32PM -0800, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
>> Asynchronously unbind the vma upon vm_unbind call.
>> Fall back to synchronous unbind if backend doesn't support
>> async unbind or if async unbind fails.
>>
>> No need for vm_unbind out fence support as i915 will internally
>> handle all sequencing and user need not try to sequence any
>> operation with the unbind completion.
>>
>> v2: use i915_vma_destroy_async in vm_unbind ioctl
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  .../drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_vm_bind_object.c    |  2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c               | 51 +++++++++++++++++--
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h               |  1 +
>>  include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h                   |  3 +-
>>  4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_vm_bind_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_vm_bind_object.c
>> index d87d1210365b..36651b447966 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_vm_bind_object.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_vm_bind_object.c
>> @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static int i915_gem_vm_unbind_vma(struct i915_address_space *vm,
>>  	 */
>>  	obj = vma->obj;
>>  	i915_gem_object_lock(obj, NULL);
>> -	i915_vma_destroy(vma);
>> +	i915_vma_destroy_async(vma);
>>  	i915_gem_object_unlock(obj);
>>
>>  	i915_gem_object_put(obj);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
>> index 7cf77c67d755..483d25f2425c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
>> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@
>>  #include "i915_vma.h"
>>  #include "i915_vma_resource.h"
>>
>> +static struct dma_fence *__i915_vma_unbind_async(struct i915_vma *vma);
>> +
>>  static inline void assert_vma_held_evict(const struct i915_vma *vma)
>>  {
>>  	/*
>> @@ -1713,7 +1715,7 @@ void i915_vma_reopen(struct i915_vma *vma)
>>  	spin_unlock_irq(&gt->closed_lock);
>>  }
>>
>> -static void force_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
>> +static void force_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma, bool async)
>
>I still like the defines on this, they look cleaner, but it's a
>matter of taste.
>

Ok, will change.

Niranjana

>Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at linux.intel.com>
>
>Andi