[PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Bpp/timeslot calculation fixes for DP MST DSC
Navare, Manasi D
manasi.d.navare at intel.com
Tue Nov 22 20:40:22 UTC 2022
Thanks Stan for the explanation,
With that
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
Manasi
-----Original Message-----
From: Lisovskiy, Stanislav <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 2:40 AM
To: Navare, Manasi D <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Saarinen, Jani <jani.saarinen at intel.com>; Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula at intel.com>; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; Govindapillai, Vinod <vinod.govindapillai at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Bpp/timeslot calculation fixes for DP MST DSC
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 02:23:53PM -0800, Navare, Manasi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 03:23:00PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> > Fix intel_dp_dsc_compute_config, previously timeslots parameter was
> > used in fact not as a timeslots, but more like a ratio timeslots/64,
> > which of course didn't have any effect for SST DSC, but causes now
> > issues for MST DSC.
> > Secondly we need to calculate pipe_bpp using
> > intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp only for SST DSC case, while for MST case
> > it has been calculated earlier already with intel_dp_dsc_mst_compute_link_config.
> > Third we also were wrongly determining sink min bpp/max bpp, those
> > limites should be intersected with our limits to find common
> > acceptable bpp's, plus on top of that we should align those with
> > VESA bpps and only then calculate required timeslots amount.
> > Some MST hubs started to work only after third change was made.
> >
> > v2: Make kernel test robot happy(claimed there was unitialzed use,
> > while there is none)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 69 ++++++++++++++-------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h | 3 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 69
> > +++++++++++++++++----
> > 3 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > index 8288a30dbd51..82752b696498 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > @@ -716,9 +716,14 @@ u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > * for SST -> TimeSlotsPerMTP is 1,
> > * for MST -> TimeSlotsPerMTP has to be calculated
> > */
> > - bits_per_pixel = (link_clock * lane_count * 8) * timeslots /
> > - intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock);
> > - drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Max link bpp: %u\n", bits_per_pixel);
> > + bits_per_pixel = DIV_ROUND_UP((link_clock * lane_count) * timeslots,
> > + intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock) * 8);
>
> Why did we remove the *8 in the numerator for the total bandwidth
> link_clock * lane_count * 8 ?
>
> Other than this clarification, all changes look good
>
> Manasi
Hi Manasi,
Because previously this function was actually confusing the ratio timeslots/64, with the timeslots number.
It was actually expecting a ratio timeslots/64, rather than the timeslots number.
For SST it didn't matter as timeslots were always 1, but for MST case if we multiply that by number number of timeslots, this formula will return some big bogus bits_per_pixel number(checked that).
Of course we can pass a ratio timeslots/64 here, but it isn't very convenient and intuitive to manipulate.
So I made it to use a "timeslots" parameter as timeslots number, so that the ratio is calculated as part of the formula i.e:
((link_clock * lane_count * 8) * (timeslots / 64)) / intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock);
which can be simplified as
((link_clock * lane_count * timeslots) / 8) / intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock);
the whole formula comes from that
pipe_bpp * crtc_clock should be equal to link_total_bw * (timeslots / 64), i.e
timeslots/64 ratio defines, how much of the link_total_bw(link_clock * lane_count * 8) we have for those pipe_bpp * crtc_clock, which we want to accomodate there.
Obviously if we just multiplied link_total_bw by timeslots, we would get a situation that the more timeslots we allocate, the more total bw we get, which is wrong and will result in some bogus huge pipe_bpp numbers.
Stan
>
> > +
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Max link bpp is %u for %u timeslots "
> > + "total bw %u pixel clock %u\n",
> > + bits_per_pixel, timeslots,
> > + (link_clock * lane_count * 8),
> > + intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock));
> >
> > /* Small Joiner Check: output bpp <= joiner RAM (bits) / Horiz. width */
> > max_bpp_small_joiner_ram = small_joiner_ram_size_bits(i915) / @@
> > -1047,7 +1052,7 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
> > target_clock,
> > mode->hdisplay,
> > bigjoiner,
> > - pipe_bpp, 1) >> 4;
> > + pipe_bpp, 64) >> 4;
> > dsc_slice_count =
> > intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(intel_dp,
> > target_clock,
> > @@ -1481,7 +1486,8 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> > struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
> > struct link_config_limits *limits,
> > - int timeslots)
> > + int timeslots,
> > + bool compute_pipe_bpp)
> > {
> > struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
> > to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev); @@ -1496,7 +1502,10 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > if (!intel_dp_supports_dsc(intel_dp, pipe_config))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp(intel_dp, conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
> > + if (compute_pipe_bpp)
> > + pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_bpp(intel_dp, conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
> > + else
> > + pipe_bpp = pipe_config->pipe_bpp;
> >
> > if (intel_dp->force_dsc_bpc) {
> > pipe_bpp = intel_dp->force_dsc_bpc * 3; @@ -1527,31 +1536,47 @@
> > int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > drm_dp_dsc_sink_max_slice_count(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd,
> > true);
> > } else {
> > - u16 dsc_max_output_bpp;
> > + u16 dsc_max_output_bpp = 0;
> > u8 dsc_dp_slice_count;
> >
> > - dsc_max_output_bpp =
> > - intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(dev_priv,
> > - pipe_config->port_clock,
> > - pipe_config->lane_count,
> > - adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> > - adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
> > - pipe_config->bigjoiner_pipes,
> > - pipe_bpp,
> > - timeslots);
> > + if (compute_pipe_bpp) {
> > + dsc_max_output_bpp =
> > + intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(dev_priv,
> > + pipe_config->port_clock,
> > + pipe_config->lane_count,
> > + adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> > + adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
> > + pipe_config->bigjoiner_pipes,
> > + pipe_bpp,
> > + timeslots);
> > + if (!dsc_max_output_bpp) {
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > + "Compressed BPP not supported\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > dsc_dp_slice_count =
> > intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(intel_dp,
> > adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> > adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
> > pipe_config->bigjoiner_pipes);
> > - if (!dsc_max_output_bpp || !dsc_dp_slice_count) {
> > + if (!dsc_dp_slice_count) {
> > drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> > - "Compressed BPP/Slice Count not supported\n");
> > + "Compressed Slice Count not supported\n");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > - pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp = min_t(u16,
> > - dsc_max_output_bpp >> 4,
> > - pipe_config->pipe_bpp);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * compute pipe bpp is set to false for DP MST DSC case
> > + * and compressed_bpp is calculated same time once
> > + * vpci timeslots are allocated, because overall bpp
> > + * calculation procedure is bit different for MST case.
> > + */
> > + if (compute_pipe_bpp) {
> > + pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp = min_t(u16,
> > + dsc_max_output_bpp >> 4,
> > + pipe_config->pipe_bpp);
> > + }
> > pipe_config->dsc.slice_count = dsc_dp_slice_count;
> > drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "DSC: compressed bpp %d slice count %d\n",
> > pipe_config->dsc.compressed_bpp, @@ -1659,7 +1684,7 @@
> > intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > str_yes_no(ret), str_yes_no(joiner_needs_dsc),
> > str_yes_no(intel_dp->force_dsc_en));
> > ret = intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(intel_dp, pipe_config,
> > - conn_state, &limits, 1);
> > + conn_state, &limits, 1, true);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> > index 0fe10d93b75c..75098001685a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> > @@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> > struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
> > struct link_config_limits *limits,
> > - int timeslots);
> > + int timeslots,
> > + bool recompute_pipe_bpp);
> > bool intel_dp_is_edp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp); bool
> > intel_dp_is_uhbr(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state); bool
> > intel_dp_is_port_edp(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum port
> > port); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > index 8442eea27a57..69e383decb39 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > @@ -80,12 +80,12 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > }
> >
> > for (bpp = max_bpp; bpp >= min_bpp; bpp -= step) {
> > - crtc_state->pipe_bpp = bpp;
> > -
> > crtc_state->pbn = drm_dp_calc_pbn_mode(adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> > - dsc ? bpp << 4 : crtc_state->pipe_bpp,
> > + dsc ? bpp << 4 : bpp,
> > dsc);
> >
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Trying bpp %d\n", bpp);
> > +
> > slots = drm_dp_atomic_find_time_slots(state, &intel_dp->mst_mgr,
> > connector->port,
> > crtc_state->pbn);
> > @@ -107,9 +107,16 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > if (ret && slots >= 0)
> > slots = ret;
> >
> > - if (slots < 0)
> > + if (slots < 0) {
> > drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "failed finding vcpi slots:%d\n",
> > slots);
> > + } else {
> > + if (!dsc)
> > + crtc_state->pipe_bpp = bpp;
> > + else
> > + crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp = bpp;
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Got %d slots for pipe bpp %d dsc %d\n", slots, bpp, dsc);
> > + }
> >
> > return slots;
> > }
> > @@ -156,8 +163,10 @@ static int intel_dp_dsc_mst_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > int slots = -EINVAL;
> > int i, num_bpc;
> > u8 dsc_bpc[3] = {0};
> > - int min_bpp, max_bpp;
> > + int min_bpp, max_bpp, sink_min_bpp, sink_max_bpp;
> > u8 dsc_max_bpc;
> > + bool need_timeslot_recalc = false;
> > + u32 last_compressed_bpp;
> >
> > /* Max DSC Input BPC for ICL is 10 and for TGL+ is 12 */
> > if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 12)
> > @@ -170,14 +179,28 @@ static int
> > intel_dp_dsc_mst_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> >
> > num_bpc = drm_dp_dsc_sink_supported_input_bpcs(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd,
> > dsc_bpc);
> > - for (i = 0; i < num_bpc; i++) {
> > - if (max_bpp >= dsc_bpc[i] * 3)
> > - if (min_bpp > dsc_bpc[i] * 3)
> > - min_bpp = dsc_bpc[i] * 3;
> > +
> > + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DSC Source supported min bpp %d max bpp %d\n",
> > + min_bpp, max_bpp);
> > +
> > + sink_max_bpp = dsc_bpc[0] * 3;
> > + sink_min_bpp = sink_max_bpp;
> > +
> > + for (i = 1; i < num_bpc; i++) {
> > + if (sink_min_bpp > dsc_bpc[i] * 3)
> > + sink_min_bpp = dsc_bpc[i] * 3;
> > + if (sink_max_bpp < dsc_bpc[i] * 3)
> > + sink_max_bpp = dsc_bpc[i] * 3;
> > }
> >
> > drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "DSC Sink supported min bpp %d max bpp %d\n",
> > - min_bpp, max_bpp);
> > + sink_min_bpp, sink_max_bpp);
> > +
> > + if (min_bpp < sink_min_bpp)
> > + min_bpp = sink_min_bpp;
> > +
> > + if (max_bpp > sink_max_bpp)
> > + max_bpp = sink_max_bpp;
> >
> > slots = intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(encoder, crtc_state, max_bpp,
> > min_bpp, limits,
> > @@ -186,6 +209,28 @@ static int intel_dp_dsc_mst_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> > if (slots < 0)
> > return slots;
> >
> > + last_compressed_bpp = crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp;
> > +
> > + crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_nearest_vesa_bpp(i915,
> > + last_compressed_bpp,
> > + crtc_state->pipe_bpp);
> > +
> > + if (crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp != last_compressed_bpp)
> > + need_timeslot_recalc = true;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Apparently some MST hubs dislike if vcpi slots are not matching precisely
> > + * the actual compressed bpp we use.
> > + */
> > + if (need_timeslot_recalc) {
> > + slots = intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(encoder, crtc_state,
> > + crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp,
> > + crtc_state->dsc.compressed_bpp,
> > + limits, conn_state, 2 * 3, true);
> > + if (slots < 0)
> > + return slots;
> > + }
> > +
> > intel_link_compute_m_n(crtc_state->pipe_bpp,
> > crtc_state->lane_count,
> > adjusted_mode->crtc_clock, @@ -292,7 +337,7 @@ static int
> > intel_dp_mst_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> >
> > ret = intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(intel_dp, pipe_config,
> > conn_state, &limits,
> > - pipe_config->dp_m_n.tu);
> > + pipe_config->dp_m_n.tu, false);
> > }
> >
> > if (ret)
> > @@ -867,7 +912,7 @@ intel_dp_mst_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *connector,
> > target_clock,
> > mode->hdisplay,
> > bigjoiner,
> > - pipe_bpp, 1) >> 4;
> > + pipe_bpp, 64) >> 4;
> > dsc_slice_count =
> > intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(intel_dp,
> > target_clock,
> > --
> > 2.37.3
> >
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list