[PATCH v3 08/18] dt-bindings: msm: dsi-controller-main: Add vdd* descriptions back in

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 24/11/2022 01:47, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> When converting from .txt to .yaml we didn't include descriptions for the
> existing regulator supplies.
> 
> - vdd
> - vdda
> - vddio
> 
> Add those descriptions into the yaml now as they were prior to the
> conversion. In the .txt description we marked these regulators as required,
> however, that requirement appears to have been in error.
> 
> Taking the example of sc7180-trogdor-wormdingler.dtsi. The avdd and avee
> come from GPIO controlled external regulators, not the SoC and in this case
> there's no need for vddio to power an I/O bus. Similarly the regulators for
> the LCD are controlled by the panel driver not by the dsi-ctrl driver.
> 
> It would be possible to connect a different type of panel to the DSI bus
> here in which case we may or may not want to make use of vdd, vdda or
> vddio.
> 
> This is also the case for older chipsets like apq8064, msm8916 etc the vdd*
> regulators in the dsi-ctrl block are helpers not dependencies.
> 
> Add the description of vdd, vdda and vddio back in for the existing
> upstream dts where vdd, vdda or vddio are already declared but, don't
> declare those regulators required - they are not SoC requirements.
> 
> Fixes: 4dbe55c97741 ("dt-bindings: msm: dsi: add yaml schemas for DSI bindings")
> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue at linaro.org>
> ---
>  .../bindings/display/msm/dsi-controller-main.yaml    | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-controller-main.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-controller-main.yaml
> index 0fbb0c04f4b06..bcbcbdca1a78a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-controller-main.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-controller-main.yaml
> @@ -133,6 +133,18 @@ properties:
>        - port at 0
>        - port at 1
>  
> +  vdd-supply:
> +    description:
> +      vdd regulator device node

I see my comment was not really implemented. I asked:
1. vdd->VDD
2. Drop "device node". It's not a device node. It's a VDD regulator.


Best regards,
Krzysztof