[PATCH v2 7/7] drm: rcar-du: dsi: Add r8a779g0 support

Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Tue Nov 29 12:05:40 UTC 2022


Hi Tomi,

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 01:30:04PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 29/11/2022 03:49, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 08:59:46AM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> >> Add DSI support for r8a779g0. The main differences to r8a779a0 are in
> >> the PLL and PHTW setups.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas at ideasonboard.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c      | 484 +++++++++++++++----
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi_regs.h |   6 +-
> >>   2 files changed, 384 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c
> >> index a7f2b7f66a17..723c35726c38 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_mipi_dsi.c
> >> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> >>   #include <linux/delay.h>
> >>   #include <linux/io.h>
> >>   #include <linux/iopoll.h>
> >> +#include <linux/math64.h>
> >>   #include <linux/module.h>
> >>   #include <linux/of.h>
> >>   #include <linux/of_device.h>
> >> @@ -28,6 +29,20 @@
> >>   #include "rcar_mipi_dsi.h"
> >>   #include "rcar_mipi_dsi_regs.h"
> >>   
> >> +#define MHZ(v) ((v) * 1000000u)
> > 
> > Isn't the U suffix usually spelled in uppercase ? Same below.
> 
> I couldn't find any coding style guidelines on that. I like the lower 
> case visually. The suffix stands out much clearer on 10000000u than on 
> 10000000U. But I can change it if you feel otherwise.

The driver uses U already and I like consistency. You can change all of
them to u if you want :-)

> >> +
> >> +enum rcar_mipi_dsi_hw_model {
> >> +	RCAR_DSI_R8A779A0,
> >> +	RCAR_DSI_R8A779G0,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +struct rcar_mipi_dsi_device_info {
> >> +	enum rcar_mipi_dsi_hw_model model;
> >> +	const struct dsi_clk_config *clk_cfg;
> >> +	u8 clockset2_m_offset;
> >> +	u8 clockset2_n_offset;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >>   struct rcar_mipi_dsi {
> >>   	struct device *dev;
> >>   	const struct rcar_mipi_dsi_device_info *info;
> >> @@ -50,6 +65,17 @@ struct rcar_mipi_dsi {
> >>   	unsigned int lanes;
> >>   };
> >>   
> >> +struct dsi_setup_info {
> >> +	unsigned long hsfreq;
> >> +	u16 hsfreqrange;
> >> +
> >> +	unsigned long fout;
> >> +	u16 m;
> >> +	u16 n;
> >> +	u16 vclk_divider;
> >> +	const struct dsi_clk_config *clkset;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >>   static inline struct rcar_mipi_dsi *
> >>   bridge_to_rcar_mipi_dsi(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> >>   {
> >> @@ -62,22 +88,6 @@ host_to_rcar_mipi_dsi(struct mipi_dsi_host *host)
> >>   	return container_of(host, struct rcar_mipi_dsi, host);
> >>   }
> >>   
> >> -static const u32 phtw[] = {
> >> -	0x01020114, 0x01600115, /* General testing */
> >> -	0x01030116, 0x0102011d, /* General testing */
> >> -	0x011101a4, 0x018601a4, /* 1Gbps testing */
> >> -	0x014201a0, 0x010001a3, /* 1Gbps testing */
> >> -	0x0101011f,		/* 1Gbps testing */
> >> -};
> >> -
> >> -static const u32 phtw2[] = {
> >> -	0x010c0130, 0x010c0140, /* General testing */
> >> -	0x010c0150, 0x010c0180, /* General testing */
> >> -	0x010c0190,
> >> -	0x010a0160, 0x010a0170,
> >> -	0x01800164, 0x01800174,	/* 1Gbps testing */
> >> -};
> >> -
> >>   static const u32 hsfreqrange_table[][2] = {
> >>   	{ 80000000U,   0x00 }, { 90000000U,   0x10 }, { 100000000U,  0x20 },
> >>   	{ 110000000U,  0x30 }, { 120000000U,  0x01 }, { 130000000U,  0x11 },
> >> @@ -103,24 +113,53 @@ static const u32 hsfreqrange_table[][2] = {
> >>   	{ /* sentinel */ },
> >>   };
> >>   
> >> -struct vco_cntrl_value {
> >> +struct dsi_clk_config {
> >>   	u32 min_freq;
> >>   	u32 max_freq;
> >> -	u16 value;
> >> +	u8 vco_cntrl;
> >> +	u8 cpbias_cntrl;
> >> +	u8 gmp_cntrl;
> >> +	u8 int_cntrl;
> >> +	u8 prop_cntrl;
> >>   };
> >>   
> >> -static const struct vco_cntrl_value vco_cntrl_table[] = {
> >> -	{ .min_freq = 40000000U,   .max_freq = 55000000U,   .value = 0x3f },
> >> -	{ .min_freq = 52500000U,   .max_freq = 80000000U,   .value = 0x39 },
> >> -	{ .min_freq = 80000000U,   .max_freq = 110000000U,  .value = 0x2f },
> >> -	{ .min_freq = 105000000U,  .max_freq = 160000000U,  .value = 0x29 },
> >> -	{ .min_freq = 160000000U,  .max_freq = 220000000U,  .value = 0x1f },
> >> -	{ .min_freq = 210000000U,  .max_freq = 320000000U,  .value = 0x19 },
> >> -	{ .min_freq = 320000000U,  .max_freq = 440000000U,  .value = 0x0f },
> >> -	{ .min_freq = 420000000U,  .max_freq = 660000000U,  .value = 0x09 },
> >> -	{ .min_freq = 630000000U,  .max_freq = 1149000000U, .value = 0x03 },
> >> -	{ .min_freq = 1100000000U, .max_freq = 1152000000U, .value = 0x01 },
> >> -	{ .min_freq = 1150000000U, .max_freq = 1250000000U, .value = 0x01 },
> >> +static const struct dsi_clk_config dsi_clk_cfg_r8a779a0[] = {
> >> +	{   40000000u,   55000000u, 0x3f, 0x10, 0x01, 0x00, 0x0b },
> >> +	{   52500000u,   80000000u, 0x39, 0x10, 0x01, 0x00, 0x0b },
> > 
> > Would MHZ(52.5) do the right thing ? If so, I'd use the macro through
> > those tables.
> 
> That's a great idea. It had never occurred to me that we can use floats 
> in the kernel code, as long as we convert to ints when the preprocessor 
> is done.
> 
> >> +	{   80000000u,  110000000u, 0x2f, 0x10, 0x01, 0x00, 0x0b },
> >> +	{  105000000u,  160000000u, 0x29, 0x10, 0x01, 0x00, 0x0b },
> >> +	{  160000000u,  220000000u, 0x1f, 0x10, 0x01, 0x00, 0x0b },
> >> +	{  210000000u,  320000000u, 0x19, 0x10, 0x01, 0x00, 0x0b },
> >> +	{  320000000u,  440000000u, 0x0f, 0x10, 0x01, 0x00, 0x0b },
> >> +	{  420000000u,  660000000u, 0x09, 0x10, 0x01, 0x00, 0x0b },
> >> +	{  630000000u, 1149000000u, 0x03, 0x10, 0x01, 0x00, 0x0b },
> >> +	{ 1100000000u, 1152000000u, 0x01, 0x10, 0x01, 0x00, 0x0b },
> >> +	{ 1150000000u, 1250000000u, 0x01, 0x10, 0x01, 0x00, 0x0c },
> >> +	{ /* sentinel */ },
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct dsi_clk_config dsi_clk_cfg_r8a779g0[] = {
> >> +	{   40000000u,   45310000u, 0x2b, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{   45310000u,   54660000u, 0x28, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{   54660000u,   62500000u, 0x28, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{   62500000u,   75000000u, 0x27, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{   75000000u,   90630000u, 0x23, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{   90630000u,  109370000u, 0x20, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{  109370000u,  125000000u, 0x20, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{  125000000u,  150000000u, 0x1f, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{  150000000u,  181250000u, 0x1b, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{  181250000u,  218750000u, 0x18, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{  218750000u,  250000000u, 0x18, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{  250000000u,  300000000u, 0x17, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{  300000000u,  362500000u, 0x13, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{  362500000u,  455480000u, 0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{  455480000u,  500000000u, 0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{  500000000u,  600000000u, 0x0f, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{  600000000u,  725000000u, 0x0b, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{  725000000u,  875000000u, 0x08, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{  875000000u, 1000000000u, 0x08, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{ 1000000000u, 1200000000u, 0x07, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >> +	{ 1200000000u, 1250000000u, 0x03, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x0a },
> >>   	{ /* sentinel */ },
> >>   };
> >>   
> >> @@ -144,7 +183,7 @@ static void rcar_mipi_dsi_set(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 reg, u32 set)
> >>   	rcar_mipi_dsi_write(dsi, reg, rcar_mipi_dsi_read(dsi, reg) | set);
> >>   }
> >>   
> >> -static int rcar_mipi_dsi_phtw_test(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 phtw)
> >> +static int rcar_mipi_dsi_write_phtw(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 phtw)
> >>   {
> >>   	u32 status;
> >>   	int ret;
> >> @@ -163,32 +202,231 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_phtw_test(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 phtw)
> >>   	return ret;
> >>   }
> >>   
> >> +static int rcar_mipi_dsi_write_phtw_arr(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> >> +					const u32 *phtw, unsigned int size)
> >> +{
> >> +	for (unsigned int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> >> +		int ret = rcar_mipi_dsi_write_phtw(dsi, phtw[i]);
> >> +
> >> +		if (ret < 0)
> >> +			return ret;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +#define WRITE_PHTW(...)                                               \
> >> +	({                                                            \
> >> +		static const u32 phtw[] = { __VA_ARGS__ };            \
> >> +		int ret;                                              \
> >> +		ret = rcar_mipi_dsi_write_phtw_arr(dsi, phtw,         \
> >> +						   ARRAY_SIZE(phtw)); \
> >> +		ret;                                                  \
> >> +	})
> >> +
> >> +static int rcar_mipi_dsi_init_phtw_v3u(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi)
> > 
> > You're mixing the R8A779* names and the short names. I'd use one of the
> > two and stick to it, probably the short name (up to you).
> 
> Hmm that's true. The short names are easier to distinguish visually, so 
> I'll use those.
> 
> >> +{
> >> +	return WRITE_PHTW(0x01020114, 0x01600115, 0x01030116, 0x0102011d,
> >> +			  0x011101a4, 0x018601a4, 0x014201a0, 0x010001a3,
> >> +			  0x0101011f);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int rcar_mipi_dsi_post_init_phtw_v3u(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi)
> >> +{
> >> +	return WRITE_PHTW(0x010c0130, 0x010c0140, 0x010c0150, 0x010c0180,
> >> +			  0x010c0190, 0x010a0160, 0x010a0170, 0x01800164,
> >> +			  0x01800174);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int rcar_mipi_dsi_init_phtw_v4h(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> >> +				       const struct dsi_setup_info *setup_info)
> >> +{
> >> +	int ret;
> >> +
> >> +	if (setup_info->hsfreq < MHZ(450)) {
> >> +		ret = WRITE_PHTW(0x01010100, 0x011b01ac);
> >> +		if (ret)
> >> +			return ret;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	ret = WRITE_PHTW(0x01010100, 0x01030173, 0x01000174, 0x01500175,
> >> +			 0x01030176, 0x01040166, 0x010201ad);
> >> +	if (ret)
> >> +		return ret;
> >> +
> >> +	if (setup_info->hsfreq <= MHZ(1000))
> >> +		ret = WRITE_PHTW(0x01020100, 0x01910170, 0x01020171,
> >> +				 0x01110172);
> >> +	else if (setup_info->hsfreq <= MHZ(1500))
> >> +		ret = WRITE_PHTW(0x01020100, 0x01980170, 0x01030171,
> >> +				 0x01100172);
> >> +	else if (setup_info->hsfreq <= MHZ(2500))
> >> +		ret = WRITE_PHTW(0x01020100, 0x0144016b, 0x01000172);
> >> +	else
> >> +		return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> +	if (ret)
> >> +		return ret;
> >> +
> >> +	if (dsi->lanes <= 1) {
> >> +		ret = WRITE_PHTW(0x01070100, 0x010e010b);
> >> +		if (ret)
> >> +			return ret;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	if (dsi->lanes <= 2) {
> >> +		ret = WRITE_PHTW(0x01090100, 0x010e010b);
> >> +		if (ret)
> >> +			return ret;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	if (dsi->lanes <= 3) {
> >> +		ret = WRITE_PHTW(0x010b0100, 0x010e010b);
> >> +		if (ret)
> >> +			return ret;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	if (setup_info->hsfreq <= MHZ(1500)) {
> >> +		ret = WRITE_PHTW(0x01010100, 0x01c0016e);
> >> +		if (ret)
> >> +			return ret;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int
> >> +rcar_mipi_dsi_post_init_phtw_v4h(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> >> +				 const struct dsi_setup_info *setup_info)
> >> +{
> >> +	u32 status;
> >> +	int ret;
> >> +
> >> +	if (setup_info->hsfreq <= MHZ(1500)) {
> >> +		WRITE_PHTW(0x01020100, 0x00000180);
> >> +
> >> +		ret = read_poll_timeout(rcar_mipi_dsi_read, status,
> >> +					status & PHTR_TEST, 2000, 10000, false,
> >> +					dsi, PHTR);
> >> +		if (ret < 0) {
> >> +			dev_err(dsi->dev, "failed to test PHTR\n");
> >> +			return ret;
> >> +		}
> >> +
> >> +		WRITE_PHTW(0x01010100, 0x0100016e);
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>   /* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>    * Hardware Setup
> >>    */
> >>   
> >> -struct dsi_setup_info {
> >> -	unsigned long fout;
> >> -	u16 vco_cntrl;
> >> -	u16 prop_cntrl;
> >> -	u16 hsfreqrange;
> >> -	u16 div;
> >> -	unsigned int m;
> >> -	unsigned int n;
> >> -};
> >> +static void rcar_mipi_dsi_pll_calc_r8a779a0(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> >> +					    struct clk *clk,
> >> +					    unsigned long fout_target,
> >> +					    struct dsi_setup_info *setup_info)
> >> +{
> >> +	unsigned int best_err = -1;
> >> +	unsigned long fin;
> >> +
> >> +	fin = clk_get_rate(clk);
> >> +
> >> +	for (unsigned int n = 3; n <= 8; n++) {
> >> +		unsigned long fpfd;
> >> +
> >> +		fpfd = fin / n;
> >> +
> >> +		if (fpfd < MHZ(2) || fpfd > MHZ(8))
> >> +			continue;
> >> +
> >> +		for (unsigned int m = 64; m <= 625; m++) {
> >> +			unsigned int err;
> >> +			u64 fout;
> >> +
> >> +			fout = (u64)fpfd * m;
> >> +
> >> +			if (fout < MHZ(320) || fout > MHZ(1250))
> >> +				continue;
> >> +
> >> +			fout = div64_u64(fout, setup_info->vclk_divider);
> >> +
> >> +			if (fout < setup_info->clkset->min_freq ||
> >> +			    fout > setup_info->clkset->max_freq)
> >> +				continue;
> >> +
> >> +			err = abs((long)(fout - fout_target) * 10000 /
> >> +				  (long)fout_target);
> >> +
> >> +			if (err < best_err) {
> >> +				setup_info->m = m;
> >> +				setup_info->n = n;
> >> +				setup_info->fout = (unsigned long)fout;
> >> +				best_err = err;
> >> +
> >> +				if (err == 0)
> >> +					return;
> >> +			}
> >> +		}
> >> +	}
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void rcar_mipi_dsi_pll_calc_r8a779g0(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> >> +					    struct clk *clk,
> >> +					    unsigned long fout_target,
> >> +					    struct dsi_setup_info *setup_info)
> >> +{
> >> +	unsigned int best_err = -1;
> >> +	unsigned long fin;
> >> +
> >> +	fin = clk_get_rate(clk);
> > 
> > This could move to the caller.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> >> +
> >> +	for (unsigned int n = 1; n <= 8; n++) {
> >> +		unsigned long fpfd;
> >> +
> >> +		fpfd = fin / n;
> >> +
> >> +		if (fpfd < MHZ(8) || fpfd > MHZ(24))
> >> +			continue;
> >> +
> >> +		for (unsigned int m = 167; m <= 1000; m++) {
> >> +			unsigned int err;
> >> +			u64 fout;
> >> +
> >> +			fout = div64_u64((u64)fpfd * m, 2);
> >> +
> >> +			if (fout < MHZ(2000) || fout > MHZ(4000))
> >> +				continue;
> >> +
> >> +			fout = div64_u64(fout, setup_info->vclk_divider);
> >> +
> >> +			if (fout < setup_info->clkset->min_freq ||
> >> +			    fout > setup_info->clkset->max_freq)
> >> +				continue;
> >> +
> >> +			err = abs((long)(fout - fout_target) * 10000 /
> >> +				  (long)fout_target);
> > 
> > Add a blank line here, or remove it from the previous function.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> >> +			if (err < best_err) {
> >> +				setup_info->m = m;
> >> +				setup_info->n = n;
> >> +				setup_info->fout = (unsigned long)fout;
> >> +				best_err = err;
> >> +
> >> +				if (err == 0)
> >> +					return;
> >> +			}
> >> +		}
> >> +	}
> >> +}
> > 
> > This function could be parameterized, up to you.
> 
> I thought about it, but it would somewhat obfuscate the code. Now it's 
> easier to look at the HW docs and read the function. If we get more PLL 
> versions, then I think we'll have to create a parametrized version...
> 
> >>   
> >>   static void rcar_mipi_dsi_parameters_calc(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> >>   					  struct clk *clk, unsigned long target,
> >>   					  struct dsi_setup_info *setup_info)
> >>   {
> >>   
> >> -	const struct vco_cntrl_value *vco_cntrl;
> >> +	const struct dsi_clk_config *clkset;
> >>   	unsigned long fout_target;
> >> -	unsigned long fin, fout;
> >> -	unsigned long hsfreq;
> >> -	unsigned int best_err = -1;
> >> -	unsigned int divider;
> >> -	unsigned int n;
> >>   	unsigned int i;
> >>   	unsigned int err;
> >>   
> >> @@ -198,70 +436,53 @@ static void rcar_mipi_dsi_parameters_calc(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> >>   	 */
> >>   	fout_target = target * mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(dsi->format)
> >>   		    / (2 * dsi->lanes);
> >> -	if (fout_target < 40000000 || fout_target > 1250000000)
> >> +	if (fout_target < MHZ(40) || fout_target > MHZ(1250))
> >>   		return;
> >>   
> >>   	/* Find vco_cntrl */
> >> -	for (vco_cntrl = vco_cntrl_table; vco_cntrl->min_freq != 0; vco_cntrl++) {
> >> -		if (fout_target > vco_cntrl->min_freq &&
> >> -		    fout_target <= vco_cntrl->max_freq) {
> >> -			setup_info->vco_cntrl = vco_cntrl->value;
> >> -			if (fout_target >= 1150000000)
> >> -				setup_info->prop_cntrl = 0x0c;
> >> -			else
> >> -				setup_info->prop_cntrl = 0x0b;
> >> +	for (clkset = dsi->info->clk_cfg; clkset->min_freq != 0; clkset++) {
> >> +		if (fout_target > clkset->min_freq &&
> >> +		    fout_target <= clkset->max_freq) {
> >> +			setup_info->clkset = clkset;
> >>   			break;
> >>   		}
> >>   	}
> >>   
> >> -	/* Add divider */
> >> -	setup_info->div = (setup_info->vco_cntrl & 0x30) >> 4;
> >> +	switch (dsi->info->model) {
> >> +	case RCAR_DSI_R8A779A0:
> >> +		setup_info->vclk_divider = 1 << ((clkset->vco_cntrl >> 4) & 0x3);
> > 
> > If you stored (clkset->vco_cntrl >> 4) & 0x3 in setup_info->vclk_divider
> > you wouldn't have to use __ffs() in rcar_mipi_dsi_startup(). You could
> > also drop the - 1 there, which would allow dropping one of the
> > switch(dsi->info->model). You can store the real divider value in
> > setup_info separately for rcar_mipi_dsi_pll_calc_r8a779a0(), or pass it
> > to the function.
> > 
> >> +		rcar_mipi_dsi_pll_calc_r8a779a0(dsi, clk, fout_target, setup_info);
> >> +		break;
> >> +
> >> +	case RCAR_DSI_R8A779G0:
> >> +		setup_info->vclk_divider = 1 << (((clkset->vco_cntrl >> 3) & 0x7) + 1);
> >> +		rcar_mipi_dsi_pll_calc_r8a779g0(dsi, clk, fout_target, setup_info);
> >> +		break;
> >> +
> >> +	default:
> >> +		return;
> >> +	}
> >>   
> >>   	/* Find hsfreqrange */
> >> -	hsfreq = fout_target * 2;
> >> +	setup_info->hsfreq = setup_info->fout * 2;
> >>   	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hsfreqrange_table); i++) {
> >> -		if (hsfreqrange_table[i][0] >= hsfreq) {
> >> +		if (hsfreqrange_table[i][0] >= setup_info->hsfreq) {
> >>   			setup_info->hsfreqrange = hsfreqrange_table[i][1];
> >>   			break;
> >>   		}
> >>   	}
> >>   
> >> -	/*
> >> -	 * Calculate n and m for PLL clock
> >> -	 * Following the HW manual the ranges of n and m are
> >> -	 * n = [3-8] and m = [64-625]
> >> -	 */
> > 
> > I'd keep the comment in rcar_mipi_dsi_pll_calc_r8a779a0(), and add a
> > similar comment in rcar_mipi_dsi_pll_calc_r8a779g0().
> 
> Well, I dropped the comment as it's just pointing the obvious: we are 
> calculating PLL config, and the n and m ranges are easily visible in the 
> code below. I can add them if you think they are useful.

Up to you.

> >> -	fin = clk_get_rate(clk);
> >> -	divider = 1 << setup_info->div;
> >> -	for (n = 3; n < 9; n++) {
> >> -		unsigned long fpfd;
> >> -		unsigned int m;
> >> -
> >> -		fpfd = fin / n;
> >> -
> >> -		for (m = 64; m < 626; m++) {
> >> -			fout = fpfd * m / divider;
> >> -			err = abs((long)(fout - fout_target) * 10000 /
> >> -				  (long)fout_target);
> >> -			if (err < best_err) {
> >> -				setup_info->m = m - 2;
> >> -				setup_info->n = n - 1;
> >> -				setup_info->fout = fout;
> >> -				best_err = err;
> >> -				if (err == 0)
> >> -					goto done;
> >> -			}
> >> -		}
> >> -	}
> >> +	err = abs((long)(setup_info->fout - fout_target) * 10000 / (long)fout_target);
> >>   
> >> -done:
> >>   	dev_dbg(dsi->dev,
> >> -		"%pC %lu Hz -> Fout %lu Hz (target %lu Hz, error %d.%02u%%), PLL M/N/DIV %u/%u/%u\n",
> >> -		clk, fin, setup_info->fout, fout_target, best_err / 100,
> >> -		best_err % 100, setup_info->m, setup_info->n, setup_info->div);
> >> +		"Fout = %u * %lu / (2 * %u * %u) = %lu (target %lu Hz, error %d.%02u%%)\n",
> > 
> > Is the "2 *" valid on V3U too ?
> 
> Good catch. It is not.
> 
> >> +		setup_info->m, clk_get_rate(clk), setup_info->n, setup_info->vclk_divider,
> > 
> > If you keep the clk_get_rate() call in this function you wouldn't have
> > to call it again here.
> 
> Yep.
> 
> >> +		setup_info->fout, fout_target,
> >> +		err / 100, err % 100);
> >> +
> >>   	dev_dbg(dsi->dev,
> >>   		"vco_cntrl = 0x%x\tprop_cntrl = 0x%x\thsfreqrange = 0x%x\n",
> >> -		setup_info->vco_cntrl, setup_info->prop_cntrl,
> >> +		clkset->vco_cntrl, clkset->prop_cntrl,
> >>   		setup_info->hsfreqrange);
> >>   }
> >>   
> >> @@ -324,7 +545,7 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_startup(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> >>   {
> >>   	struct dsi_setup_info setup_info = {};
> >>   	unsigned int timeout;
> >> -	int ret, i;
> >> +	int ret;
> >>   	int dsi_format;
> >>   	u32 phy_setup;
> >>   	u32 clockset2, clockset3;
> >> @@ -360,10 +581,21 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_startup(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> >>   	phy_setup |= PHYSETUP_HSFREQRANGE(setup_info.hsfreqrange);
> >>   	rcar_mipi_dsi_write(dsi, PHYSETUP, phy_setup);
> >>   
> >> -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(phtw); i++) {
> >> -		ret = rcar_mipi_dsi_phtw_test(dsi, phtw[i]);
> >> +	switch (dsi->info->model) {
> >> +	case RCAR_DSI_R8A779A0:
> >> +		ret = rcar_mipi_dsi_init_phtw_v3u(dsi);
> >> +		if (ret < 0)
> >> +			return ret;
> >> +		break;
> >> +
> >> +	case RCAR_DSI_R8A779G0:
> >> +		ret = rcar_mipi_dsi_init_phtw_v4h(dsi, &setup_info);
> >>   		if (ret < 0)
> >>   			return ret;
> >> +		break;
> >> +
> >> +	default:
> >> +		return -ENODEV;
> > 
> > This can't happen. Same below.
> 
> I thought the compiler would warn about it, but at least mine doesn't, 
> so I'll drop the default cases.

smatch or other static checkers may complain. You can add a default case
to one of the labels to avoid that.

> >>   	}
> >>   
> >>   	/* PLL Clock Setting */
> >> @@ -371,12 +603,13 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_startup(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> >>   	rcar_mipi_dsi_set(dsi, CLOCKSET1, CLOCKSET1_SHADOW_CLEAR);
> >>   	rcar_mipi_dsi_clr(dsi, CLOCKSET1, CLOCKSET1_SHADOW_CLEAR);
> >>   
> >> -	clockset2 = CLOCKSET2_M(setup_info.m) | CLOCKSET2_N(setup_info.n)
> >> -		  | CLOCKSET2_VCO_CNTRL(setup_info.vco_cntrl);
> >> -	clockset3 = CLOCKSET3_PROP_CNTRL(setup_info.prop_cntrl)
> >> -		  | CLOCKSET3_INT_CNTRL(0)
> >> -		  | CLOCKSET3_CPBIAS_CNTRL(0x10)
> >> -		  | CLOCKSET3_GMP_CNTRL(1);
> >> +	clockset2 = CLOCKSET2_M(setup_info.m - dsi->info->clockset2_m_offset)
> >> +		  | CLOCKSET2_N(setup_info.n - dsi->info->clockset2_n_offset)
> >> +		  | CLOCKSET2_VCO_CNTRL(setup_info.clkset->vco_cntrl);
> >> +	clockset3 = CLOCKSET3_PROP_CNTRL(setup_info.clkset->prop_cntrl)
> >> +		  | CLOCKSET3_INT_CNTRL(setup_info.clkset->int_cntrl)
> >> +		  | CLOCKSET3_CPBIAS_CNTRL(setup_info.clkset->cpbias_cntrl)
> >> +		  | CLOCKSET3_GMP_CNTRL(setup_info.clkset->gmp_cntrl);
> >>   	rcar_mipi_dsi_write(dsi, CLOCKSET2, clockset2);
> >>   	rcar_mipi_dsi_write(dsi, CLOCKSET3, clockset3);
> >>   
> >> @@ -407,10 +640,21 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_startup(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> >>   		return -ETIMEDOUT;
> >>   	}
> >>   
> >> -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(phtw2); i++) {
> >> -		ret = rcar_mipi_dsi_phtw_test(dsi, phtw2[i]);
> >> +	switch (dsi->info->model) {
> >> +	case RCAR_DSI_R8A779A0:
> >> +		ret = rcar_mipi_dsi_post_init_phtw_v3u(dsi);
> >>   		if (ret < 0)
> >>   			return ret;
> >> +		break;
> >> +
> >> +	case RCAR_DSI_R8A779G0:
> >> +		ret = rcar_mipi_dsi_post_init_phtw_v4h(dsi, &setup_info);
> >> +		if (ret < 0)
> >> +			return ret;
> >> +		break;
> >> +
> >> +	default:
> >> +		return -ENODEV;
> >>   	}
> >>   
> >>   	/* Enable DOT clock */
> >> @@ -427,8 +671,21 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_startup(struct rcar_mipi_dsi *dsi,
> >>   		dev_warn(dsi->dev, "unsupported format");
> >>   		return -EINVAL;
> >>   	}
> >> -	vclkset |= VCLKSET_COLOR_RGB | VCLKSET_DIV(setup_info.div)
> >> -		|  VCLKSET_LANE(dsi->lanes - 1);
> >> +
> >> +	vclkset |= VCLKSET_COLOR_RGB | VCLKSET_LANE(dsi->lanes - 1);
> >> +
> >> +	switch (dsi->info->model) {
> >> +	case RCAR_DSI_R8A779A0:
> >> +		vclkset |= VCLKSET_DIV_R8A779A0(__ffs(setup_info.vclk_divider));
> >> +		break;
> >> +
> >> +	case RCAR_DSI_R8A779G0:
> >> +		vclkset |= VCLKSET_DIV_R8A779G0(__ffs(setup_info.vclk_divider) - 1);
> >> +		break;
> >> +
> >> +	default:
> >> +		return -ENODEV;
> >> +	}
> >>   
> >>   	rcar_mipi_dsi_write(dsi, VCLKSET, vclkset);
> >>   
> >> @@ -841,8 +1098,25 @@ static int rcar_mipi_dsi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>   	return 0;
> >>   }
> >>   
> >> +static const struct rcar_mipi_dsi_device_info r8a779a0_data = {
> >> +	.model = RCAR_DSI_R8A779A0,
> >> +	.clk_cfg = dsi_clk_cfg_r8a779a0,
> >> +	.clockset2_m_offset = 2,
> >> +	.clockset2_n_offset = 1,
> >> +
> > 
> > Extra blank line.
> 
> Yep.
> 
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct rcar_mipi_dsi_device_info r8a779g0_data = {
> >> +	.model = RCAR_DSI_R8A779G0,
> >> +	.clk_cfg = dsi_clk_cfg_r8a779g0,
> >> +	.clockset2_m_offset = 0,
> >> +	.clockset2_n_offset = 1,
> > 
> > You could possibly drop clockset2_n_offset as it's identical for the two
> > variants, and there's no indication it would be different in another
> > version of the IP core.
> 
> Yep, I think that's fine.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


More information about the dri-devel mailing list