[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/1] drm/i915: Use GEN12 RPSTAT register
Andi Shyti
andi.shyti at linux.intel.com
Mon Oct 3 17:22:02 UTC 2022
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 06:47:28PM -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2022 04:35:29 -0700, Badal Nilawar wrote:
> >
> > From: Don Hiatt <don.hiatt at intel.com>
> >
> > On GEN12 and above use GEN12_RPSTAT register to get Current
> > Actual Graphics Frequency of GT
>
> I think even for the purposes of reviewing this it would be good to mention
> in the commit message that:
>
> a. GEN12_RPSTAT register doesn't require a forcewake to be read (it doesn't
> belong to a forcewake domain)
> b. Will result in a 0 frequency if the GT is in RC6
perhaps also in a comment... (continue)
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Ashutosh
>
> > v2:
> > - Fixed review comments(Ashutosh)
> > - Added function intel_rps_read_rpstat_fw to read RPSTAT without
> > forcewake, required especially for GEN6_RPSTAT1 (Ashutosh, Tvrtko)
> >
> > Cc: Don Hiatt <donhiatt at gmail.com>
> > Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Don Hiatt <don.hiatt at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm_debugfs.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h | 4 +++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h | 2 ++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 3 +-
> > 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm_debugfs.c
> > index 10f680dbd7b6..b9b47052b26d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm_debugfs.c
> > @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ void intel_gt_pm_frequency_dump(struct intel_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
> > rpinclimit = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RP_UP_THRESHOLD);
> > rpdeclimit = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RP_DOWN_THRESHOLD);
> >
> > - rpstat = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RPSTAT1);
> > + rpstat = intel_rps_read_rpstat(rps);
> > rpcurupei = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RP_CUR_UP_EI) & GEN6_CURICONT_MASK;
> > rpcurup = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RP_CUR_UP) & GEN6_CURBSYTAVG_MASK;
> > rpprevup = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RP_PREV_UP) & GEN6_CURBSYTAVG_MASK;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> > index 7f79bbf97828..1f1e90acc1ab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h
> > @@ -1519,6 +1519,10 @@
> > #define VLV_RENDER_C0_COUNT _MMIO(0x138118)
> > #define VLV_MEDIA_C0_COUNT _MMIO(0x13811c)
> >
> > +#define GEN12_RPSTAT1 _MMIO(0x1381b4)
> > +#define GEN12_CAGF_SHIFT 11
> > +#define GEN12_CAGF_MASK REG_GENMASK(19, 11)
> > +
> > #define GEN11_GT_INTR_DW(x) _MMIO(0x190018 + ((x) * 4))
> > #define GEN11_CSME (31)
> > #define GEN11_GUNIT (28)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> > index 17b40b625e31..5a15a630b1c6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> > @@ -2068,12 +2068,40 @@ void intel_rps_sanitize(struct intel_rps *rps)
> > rps_disable_interrupts(rps);
> > }
... here!
> > +u32 intel_rps_read_rpstat_fw(struct intel_rps *rps)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = rps_to_i915(rps);
> > + i915_reg_t rpstat;
> > +
> > + if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 12)
> > + rpstat = GEN12_RPSTAT1;
> > + else
> > + rpstat = GEN6_RPSTAT1;
> > +
> > + return intel_uncore_read_fw(rps_to_gt(rps)->uncore, rpstat);
> > +}
> > +
> > +u32 intel_rps_read_rpstat(struct intel_rps *rps)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = rps_to_i915(rps);
> > + i915_reg_t rpstat;
> > +
> > + if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 12)
> > + rpstat = GEN12_RPSTAT1;
> > + else
> > + rpstat = GEN6_RPSTAT1;
> > +
> > + return intel_uncore_read(rps_to_gt(rps)->uncore, rpstat);
> > +}
perhaps this can be simplified a bit more to avoid some code
duplication, but I'm not going to push on this.
I see that CI got stuck somewhere, but the failure doesn't seem
to be related to this patch.
Otherwise it all looks good, with the improved git comment as
Ashutosh asked and the comment above:
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at linux.intel.com>
Andi
> > u32 intel_rps_get_cagf(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 rpstat)
> > {
> > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = rps_to_i915(rps);
> > u32 cagf;
> >
> > - if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915))
> > + if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 12)
> > + cagf = (rpstat & GEN12_CAGF_MASK) >> GEN12_CAGF_SHIFT;
> > + else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(i915) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(i915))
> > cagf = (rpstat >> 8) & 0xff;
> > else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 9)
> > cagf = (rpstat & GEN9_CAGF_MASK) >> GEN9_CAGF_SHIFT;
> > @@ -2099,7 +2127,7 @@ static u32 read_cagf(struct intel_rps *rps)
> > freq = vlv_punit_read(i915, PUNIT_REG_GPU_FREQ_STS);
> > vlv_punit_put(i915);
> > } else if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 6) {
> > - freq = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RPSTAT1);
> > + freq = intel_rps_read_rpstat(rps);
> > } else {
> > freq = intel_uncore_read(uncore, MEMSTAT_ILK);
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
> > index 4509dfdc52e0..76c8404d8416 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
> > @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ u32 intel_rps_get_rp1_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
> > u32 intel_rps_get_rpn_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
> > u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req(struct intel_rps *rps);
> > u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
> > +u32 intel_rps_read_rpstat(struct intel_rps *rps);
> > +u32 intel_rps_read_rpstat_fw(struct intel_rps *rps);
> > void gen6_rps_get_freq_caps(struct intel_rps *rps, struct intel_rps_freq_caps *caps);
> > void intel_rps_raise_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps);
> > void intel_rps_lower_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> > index 958b37123bf1..67140a87182f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
> > @@ -371,7 +371,6 @@ static void
> > frequency_sample(struct intel_gt *gt, unsigned int period_ns)
> > {
> > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gt->i915;
> > - struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
> > struct i915_pmu *pmu = &i915->pmu;
> > struct intel_rps *rps = >->rps;
> >
> > @@ -394,7 +393,7 @@ frequency_sample(struct intel_gt *gt, unsigned int period_ns)
> > * case we assume the system is running at the intended
> > * frequency. Fortunately, the read should rarely fail!
> > */
> > - val = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, GEN6_RPSTAT1);
> > + val = intel_rps_read_rpstat_fw(rps);
> > if (val)
> > val = intel_rps_get_cagf(rps, val);
> > else
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list