[PATCH v2 15/17] drm/i915/vm_bind: Handle persistent vmas in execbuf3
Niranjana Vishwanathapura
niranjana.vishwanathapura at intel.com
Tue Oct 4 20:09:52 UTC 2022
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 01:18:27PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
>On 03/10/2022 07:12, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
>>Handle persistent (VM_BIND) mappings during the request submission
>>in the execbuf3 path.
>>
>>v2: Ensure requests wait for bindings to complete.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura at intel.com>
>>Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at linux.intel.com>
>>---
>> .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer3.c | 214 +++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 213 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer3.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer3.c
>>index 66b723842e45..5cece16949d8 100644
>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer3.c
>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer3.c
>>@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>> #include "i915_gem_vm_bind.h"
>> #include "i915_trace.h"
>>+#define __EXEC3_HAS_PIN BIT_ULL(33)
>> #define __EXEC3_ENGINE_PINNED BIT_ULL(32)
>> #define __EXEC3_INTERNAL_FLAGS (~0ull << 32)
>>@@ -42,7 +43,9 @@
>> * execlist. Hence, no support for implicit sync.
>> *
>> * The new execbuf3 ioctl only works in VM_BIND mode and the VM_BIND mode only
>>- * works with execbuf3 ioctl for submission.
>>+ * works with execbuf3 ioctl for submission. All BOs mapped on that VM (through
>>+ * VM_BIND call) at the time of execbuf3 call are deemed required for that
>>+ * submission.
>> *
>> * The execbuf3 ioctl directly specifies the batch addresses instead of as
>> * object handles as in execbuf2 ioctl. The execbuf3 ioctl will also not
>>@@ -58,6 +61,13 @@
>> * So, a lot of code supporting execbuf2 ioctl, like relocations, VA evictions,
>> * vma lookup table, implicit sync, vma active reference tracking etc., are not
>> * applicable for execbuf3 ioctl.
>>+ *
>>+ * During each execbuf submission, request fence is added to all VM_BIND mapped
>>+ * objects with DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP. The DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP usage will
>>+ * prevent over sync (See enum dma_resv_usage). Note that DRM_I915_GEM_WAIT and
>>+ * DRM_I915_GEM_BUSY ioctls do not check for DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP usage and
>>+ * hence should not be used for end of batch check. Instead, the execbuf3
>>+ * timeline out fence should be used for end of batch check.
>> */
>> /**
>>@@ -127,6 +137,23 @@ eb_find_vma(struct i915_address_space *vm, u64 addr)
>> return i915_gem_vm_bind_lookup_vma(vm, va);
>> }
>>+static void eb_scoop_unbound_vma_all(struct i915_address_space *vm)
>>+{
>>+ struct i915_vma *vma, *vn;
>>+
>>+ /**
>>+ * Move all unbound vmas back into vm_bind_list so that they are
>>+ * revalidated.
>>+ */
>>+ spin_lock(&vm->vm_rebind_lock);
>>+ list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, vn, &vm->vm_rebind_list, vm_rebind_link) {
>>+ list_del_init(&vma->vm_rebind_link);
>>+ if (!list_empty(&vma->vm_bind_link))
>>+ list_move_tail(&vma->vm_bind_link, &vm->vm_bind_list);
>>+ }
>>+ spin_unlock(&vm->vm_rebind_lock);
>>+}
>>+
>> static int eb_lookup_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>> {
>> unsigned int i, current_batch = 0;
>>@@ -141,14 +168,121 @@ static int eb_lookup_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>> ++current_batch;
>> }
>>+ eb_scoop_unbound_vma_all(eb->context->vm);
>>+
>> return 0;
>> }
>>+static int eb_lock_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>>+{
>>+ struct i915_address_space *vm = eb->context->vm;
>>+ struct i915_vma *vma;
>>+ int err;
>>+
>>+ err = i915_gem_object_lock(eb->context->vm->root_obj, &eb->ww);
>>+ if (err)
>>+ return err;
>>+
>>+ list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->non_priv_vm_bind_list,
>>+ non_priv_vm_bind_link) {
>>+ err = i915_gem_object_lock(vma->obj, &eb->ww);
>>+ if (err)
>>+ return err;
>>+ }
>>+
>>+ return 0;
>>+}
>>+
>>+static void eb_release_persistent_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>>+ bool final)
>>+{
>>+ struct i915_address_space *vm = eb->context->vm;
>>+ struct i915_vma *vma, *vn;
>>+
>>+ lockdep_assert_held(&vm->vm_bind_lock);
>>+
>>+ if (!(eb->args->flags & __EXEC3_HAS_PIN))
>>+ return;
>>+
>>+ assert_object_held(vm->root_obj);
>>+
>>+ list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->vm_bind_list, vm_bind_link)
>>+ __i915_vma_unpin(vma);
>>+
>>+ eb->args->flags &= ~__EXEC3_HAS_PIN;
>>+ if (!final)
>>+ return;
>>+
>>+ list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, vn, &vm->vm_bind_list, vm_bind_link)
>>+ if (i915_vma_verify_bind_complete(vma))
>>+ list_move_tail(&vma->vm_bind_link, &vm->vm_bound_list);
>>+}
>>+
>> static void eb_release_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb, bool final)
>> {
>>+ eb_release_persistent_vma_all(eb, final);
>> eb_unpin_engine(eb);
>> }
>>+static int eb_reserve_fence_for_persistent_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>>+{
>>+ struct i915_address_space *vm = eb->context->vm;
>>+ struct i915_vma *vma;
>>+ int ret;
>>+
>>+ ret = dma_resv_reserve_fences(vm->root_obj->base.resv, 1);
>>+ if (ret)
>>+ return ret;
>>+
>>+ list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->non_priv_vm_bind_list,
>>+ non_priv_vm_bind_link) {
>>+ ret = dma_resv_reserve_fences(vma->obj->base.resv, 1);
>>+ if (ret)
>>+ return ret;
>>+ }
>>+
>>+ return 0;
>>+}
>>+
>>+static int eb_validate_persistent_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>>+{
>>+ struct i915_address_space *vm = eb->context->vm;
>>+ struct i915_vma *vma, *last_pinned_vma = NULL;
>>+ int ret = 0;
>>+
>>+ lockdep_assert_held(&vm->vm_bind_lock);
>>+ assert_object_held(vm->root_obj);
>>+
>>+ ret = eb_reserve_fence_for_persistent_vma_all(eb);
>>+ if (ret)
>>+ return ret;
>>+
>>+ if (list_empty(&vm->vm_bind_list))
>>+ return 0;
>>+
>>+ list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->vm_bind_list, vm_bind_link) {
>>+ u64 pin_flags = vma->start | PIN_OFFSET_FIXED | PIN_USER;
>
>Is it possible to use PIN_VALIDATE here? IIRC the idea behind that was
>to avoid short term pinning in execbuf, which is not very friendly for
>eviction, and rather just have the object lock and/or dma-resv
>activity to protect the binding. If so, could maybe also use it in the
>vm_bind ioctl.
>
Ok, will update both in execbuf3 and vm_bind ioctls.
Regards,
Niranjana
>>+
>>+ ret = i915_vma_pin_ww(vma, &eb->ww, 0, 0, pin_flags);
>>+ if (ret)
>>+ break;
>>+
>>+ last_pinned_vma = vma;
>>+ }
>>+
>>+ if (ret && last_pinned_vma) {
>>+ list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->vm_bind_list, vm_bind_link) {
>>+ __i915_vma_unpin(vma);
>>+ if (vma == last_pinned_vma)
>>+ break;
>>+ }
>>+ } else if (last_pinned_vma) {
>>+ eb->args->flags |= __EXEC3_HAS_PIN;
>>+ }
>>+
>>+ return ret;
>>+}
>>+
>> /*
>> * Using two helper loops for the order of which requests / batches are created
>> * and added the to backend. Requests are created in order from the parent to
>>@@ -160,13 +294,74 @@ static void eb_release_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb, bool final)
>> */
>> #define for_each_batch_create_order(_eb) \
>> for (unsigned int i = 0; i < (_eb)->num_batches; ++i)
>>+#define for_each_batch_add_order(_eb) \
>>+ for (int i = (_eb)->num_batches - 1; i >= 0; --i)
>>+
>>+static void __eb_persistent_add_shared_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>>+ struct dma_fence *fence)
>>+{
>>+ dma_resv_add_fence(obj->base.resv, fence, DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP);
>>+ obj->write_domain = 0;
>>+ obj->read_domains |= I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS;
>>+ obj->mm.dirty = true;
>>+}
>>+
>>+static void eb_persistent_add_shared_fence(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>>+{
>>+ struct i915_address_space *vm = eb->context->vm;
>>+ struct dma_fence *fence;
>>+ struct i915_vma *vma;
>>+
>>+ fence = eb->composite_fence ? eb->composite_fence :
>>+ &eb->requests[0]->fence;
>>+
>>+ __eb_persistent_add_shared_fence(vm->root_obj, fence);
>>+ list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->non_priv_vm_bind_list,
>>+ non_priv_vm_bind_link)
>>+ __eb_persistent_add_shared_fence(vma->obj, fence);
>>+}
>>+
>>+static void eb_move_all_persistent_vma_to_active(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>>+{
>>+ /* Add fence to BOs dma-resv fence list */
>>+ eb_persistent_add_shared_fence(eb);
>>+}
>> static int eb_move_to_gpu(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
>> {
>>+ struct i915_address_space *vm = eb->context->vm;
>>+ struct i915_vma *vma;
>>+ int err = 0;
>>+
>>+ lockdep_assert_held(&vm->vm_bind_lock);
>>+ assert_object_held(vm->root_obj);
>>+
>>+ eb_move_all_persistent_vma_to_active(eb);
>>+
>>+ list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->vm_bind_list, vm_bind_link) {
>>+ for_each_batch_add_order(eb) {
>>+ if (!eb->requests[i])
>>+ continue;
>>+
>>+ err = i915_request_await_bind(eb->requests[i], vma);
>>+ if (err)
>>+ goto err_skip;
>>+ }
>>+ }
>>+
>> /* Unconditionally flush any chipset caches (for streaming writes). */
>> intel_gt_chipset_flush(eb->gt);
>> return 0;
>>+
>>+err_skip:
>>+ for_each_batch_create_order(eb) {
>>+ if (!eb->requests[i])
>>+ break;
>>+
>>+ i915_request_set_error_once(eb->requests[i], err);
>>+ }
>>+ return err;
>> }
>> static int eb_request_submit(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
>>@@ -478,6 +673,7 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
>> mutex_lock(&eb.context->vm->vm_bind_lock);
>>+lookup_vmas:
>> err = eb_lookup_vma_all(&eb);
>> if (err) {
>> eb_release_vma_all(&eb, true);
>>@@ -494,6 +690,22 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
>> /* only throttle once, even if we didn't need to throttle */
>> throttle = false;
>>+ err = eb_lock_vma_all(&eb);
>>+ if (err)
>>+ goto err_validate;
>>+
>>+ /**
>>+ * No object unbinds possible once the objects are locked. So,
>>+ * check for any unbinds here, which needs to be scooped up.
>>+ */
>>+ if (!list_empty(&eb.context->vm->vm_rebind_list)) {
>>+ eb_release_vma_all(&eb, true);
>>+ i915_gem_ww_ctx_fini(&eb.ww);
>>+ goto lookup_vmas;
>>+ }
>>+
>>+ err = eb_validate_persistent_vma_all(&eb);
>>+
>> err_validate:
>> if (err == -EDEADLK) {
>> eb_release_vma_all(&eb, false);
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list