[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/huc: only load HuC on GTs that have VCS engines
Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com
Fri Sep 23 15:41:08 UTC 2022
On 9/23/2022 3:53 AM, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 22/09/2022 23:11, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
>> On MTL the primary GT doesn't have any media capabilities, so no video
>> engines and no HuC. We must therefore skip the HuC fetch and load on
>> that specific case. Given that other multi-GT platforms might have HuC
>> on the primary GT, we can't just check for that and it is easier to
>> instead check for the lack of VCS engines.
>>
>> Based on code from Aravind Iddamsetty
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
>> Cc: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty at intel.com>
>> Cc: John Harrison <john.c.harrison at intel.com>
>> Cc: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 9 ++++++---
>> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.c
>> index 3bb8838e325a..d4e2b252f16c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.c
>> @@ -42,12 +42,33 @@
>> * HuC-specific commands.
>> */
>> +static bool vcs_supported(struct intel_gt *gt)
>> +{
>> + intel_engine_mask_t mask = gt->info.engine_mask;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * we can reach here from i915_driver_early_probe for primary
>> + * GT with it being not fully setup hence fall back to the
>> device info's
>> + * engine mask
>> + */
>> + if (!mask && gt_is_root(gt))
>> + mask = RUNTIME_INFO(gt->i915)->platform_engine_mask;
>
> Is it possible for all instances to be fused off? Wondering if the
> function shouldn't just use platform_engine_mask.
The spec says that there is always going to be at least 1 VCS (bspec
55417 in case you want to double-check). I don't see that changing in
the future, because what's the point of having a media GT if you don't
have any enabled VCS engines on it?
Also, platform_engine_mask only contains the entries of the primary GT,
for the other GTs we'd have to navigate the array in the device info
structure and I don't think we want to do that from here when we've
already copied the mask inside gt->info.engine_mask.
Daniele
>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
>> +
>> + return __ENGINE_INSTANCES_MASK(mask, VCS0, I915_MAX_VCS);
>> +}
>> +
>> void intel_huc_init_early(struct intel_huc *huc)
>> {
>> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = huc_to_gt(huc)->i915;
>> + struct intel_gt *gt = huc_to_gt(huc);
>> intel_uc_fw_init_early(&huc->fw, INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_HUC);
>> + if (!vcs_supported(gt)) {
>> + intel_uc_fw_change_status(&huc->fw,
>> INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_NOT_SUPPORTED);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 11) {
>> huc->status.reg = GEN11_HUC_KERNEL_LOAD_INFO;
>> huc->status.mask = HUC_LOAD_SUCCESSFUL;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> index 134fc1621821..8ca575202e5d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>> @@ -777,12 +777,15 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private
>> *i915,
>> #define __HAS_ENGINE(engine_mask, id) ((engine_mask) & BIT(id))
>> #define HAS_ENGINE(gt, id) __HAS_ENGINE((gt)->info.engine_mask, id)
>> -#define ENGINE_INSTANCES_MASK(gt, first, count) ({ \
>> +#define __ENGINE_INSTANCES_MASK(mask, first, count) ({ \
>> unsigned int first__ = (first); \
>> unsigned int count__ = (count); \
>> - ((gt)->info.engine_mask & \
>> - GENMASK(first__ + count__ - 1, first__)) >> first__; \
>> + ((mask) & GENMASK(first__ + count__ - 1, first__)) >> first__; \
>> })
>> +
>> +#define ENGINE_INSTANCES_MASK(gt, first, count) \
>> + __ENGINE_INSTANCES_MASK((gt)->info.engine_mask, first, count)
>> +
>> #define RCS_MASK(gt) \
>> ENGINE_INSTANCES_MASK(gt, RCS0, I915_MAX_RCS)
>> #define BCS_MASK(gt) \
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list