[PATCH v2 1/5] drm/tests: Test drm_rect_intersect()

Arthur Grillo Queiroz Cabral arthurgrillo at riseup.net
Mon Apr 3 18:06:23 UTC 2023



On 03/04/23 12:33, Maíra Canal wrote:
> Hi Arthur,
> 
> On 3/27/23 10:38, Arthur Grillo wrote:
>> Insert test for the drm_rect_intersect() function, it also create a
>> helper for comparing drm_rects more easily.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arthur Grillo <arthurgrillo at riseup.net>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 139 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c
>> index e9809ea32696..3654c0be3d6b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c
>> @@ -9,6 +9,17 @@
>>     #include <drm/drm_rect.h>
>>   +#include <linux/string_helpers.h>
> 
> Is this include really needed? I was able to compile without it.
> 
>> +
>> +static void drm_rect_compare(struct kunit *test, const struct drm_rect *r,
>> +                 const struct drm_rect *expected)
>> +{
>> +    KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->x1, expected->x1);
> 
> Maybe it would be nice to have a message here that shows the current x1
> and the expected x1. Same for the other dimensions.
> 

Doesn't KUnit already output this information when the values don't
match?

>> +    KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->y1, expected->y1);
>> +    KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_rect_width(r), drm_rect_width(expected));
>> +    KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, drm_rect_height(r), drm_rect_height(expected));
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void drm_test_rect_clip_scaled_div_by_zero(struct kunit *test)
>>   {
>>       struct drm_rect src, dst, clip;
>> @@ -196,11 +207,139 @@ static void drm_test_rect_clip_scaled_signed_vs_unsigned(struct kunit *test)
>>       KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_rect_visible(&src), "Source should not be visible\n");
>>   }
>>   +struct drm_rect_intersect_case {
>> +    const char *description;
>> +    struct drm_rect r1, r2;
>> +    bool should_be_visible;
>> +    struct drm_rect expected_intersection;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct drm_rect_intersect_case drm_rect_intersect_cases[] = {
>> +    {
>> +        .description = "top-left X bottom-right",
>> +        .r1 = DRM_RECT_INIT(1, 1, 2, 2),
>> +        .r2 = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 2, 2),
>> +        .should_be_visible = true,
>> +        .expected_intersection = DRM_RECT_INIT(1, 1, 1, 1),
>> +    },
>> +    {
>> +        .description = "top-right X bottom-left",
>> +        .r1 = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 2, 2),
>> +        .r2 = DRM_RECT_INIT(1, -1, 2, 2),
>> +        .should_be_visible = true,
>> +        .expected_intersection = DRM_RECT_INIT(1, 0, 1, 1),
>> +    },
>> +    {
>> +        .description = "bottom-left X top-right",
>> +        .r1 = DRM_RECT_INIT(1, -1, 2, 2),
>> +        .r2 = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 2, 2),
>> +        .should_be_visible = true,
>> +        .expected_intersection = DRM_RECT_INIT(1, 0, 1, 1),
>> +    },
>> +    {
>> +        .description = "bottom-right X top-left",
>> +        .r1 = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 2, 2),
>> +        .r2 = DRM_RECT_INIT(1, 1, 2, 2),
>> +        .should_be_visible = true,
>> +        .expected_intersection = DRM_RECT_INIT(1, 1, 1, 1),
>> +    },
>> +    {
>> +        .description = "right X left",
>> +        .r1 = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 2, 1),
>> +        .r2 = DRM_RECT_INIT(1, 0, 3, 1),
>> +        .should_be_visible = true,
>> +        .expected_intersection = DRM_RECT_INIT(1, 0, 1, 1),
>> +    },
>> +    {
>> +        .description = "left X right",
>> +        .r1 = DRM_RECT_INIT(1, 0, 3, 1),
>> +        .r2 = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 2, 1),
>> +        .should_be_visible = true,
>> +        .expected_intersection = DRM_RECT_INIT(1, 0, 1, 1),
>> +    },
>> +    {
>> +        .description = "up X bottom",
>> +        .r1 = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 1, 2),
>> +        .r2 = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, -1, 1, 3),
>> +        .should_be_visible = true,
>> +        .expected_intersection = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 1, 2),
>> +    },
>> +    {
>> +        .description = "bottom X up",
>> +        .r1 = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, -1, 1, 3),
>> +        .r2 = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 1, 2),
>> +        .should_be_visible = true,
>> +        .expected_intersection = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 1, 2),
>> +    },
>> +    {
>> +        .description = "touching corner",
>> +        .r1 = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 1, 1),
>> +        .r2 = DRM_RECT_INIT(1, 1, 2, 2),
>> +        .should_be_visible = false,
>> +        .expected_intersection = DRM_RECT_INIT(1, 1, 0, 0),
>> +    },
>> +    {
>> +        .description = "touching side",
>> +        .r1 = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 1, 1),
>> +        .r2 = DRM_RECT_INIT(1, 0, 1, 1),
>> +        .should_be_visible = false,
>> +        .expected_intersection = DRM_RECT_INIT(1, 0, 0, 1),
>> +    },
>> +    {
>> +        .description = "equal rects",
>> +        .r1 = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 2, 2),
>> +        .r2 = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 2, 2),
>> +        .should_be_visible = true,
>> +        .expected_intersection = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 2, 2),
>> +    },
>> +    {
>> +        .description = "inside another",
>> +        .r1 = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 2, 2),
>> +        .r2 = DRM_RECT_INIT(1, 1, 1, 1),
>> +        .should_be_visible = true,
>> +        .expected_intersection = DRM_RECT_INIT(1, 1, 1, 1),
>> +    },
>> +    {
>> +        .description = "far away",
>> +        .r1 = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 1, 1),
>> +        .r2 = DRM_RECT_INIT(3, 6, 1, 1),
>> +        .should_be_visible = false,
>> +        .expected_intersection = DRM_RECT_INIT(3, 6, -2, -5),
>> +    },
>> +};
> 
> What happens if width = height = 0? It would be nice to have a test
> case for this scenario.
> 
>> +
>> +static void drm_rect_intersect_case_desc(const struct drm_rect_intersect_case *t, char *desc)
>> +{
>> +    if (!t->description)
>> +        snprintf(desc, KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE,
>> +             DRM_RECT_FMT " X " DRM_RECT_FMT,
>> +             DRM_RECT_ARG(&t->r1), DRM_RECT_ARG(&t->r2));
> 
> Is this conditional clause really needed? All parameters have
> description.
> 
>> +    else
>> +        snprintf(desc, KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE,
>> +             "%s: " DRM_RECT_FMT " X " DRM_RECT_FMT,
>> +             t->description, DRM_RECT_ARG(&t->r1), DRM_RECT_ARG(&t->r2));
>> +}
>> +
>> +KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(drm_rect_intersect, drm_rect_intersect_cases, drm_rect_intersect_case_desc);
>> +
>> +static void drm_test_rect_intersect(struct kunit *test)
>> +{
>> +    const struct drm_rect_intersect_case *params = test->param_value;
>> +    struct drm_rect r1_aux = params->r1;
> 
> Does this variable needs to exist? I guess you could just use params->r1.
> 

I think it does because the params variable is const.

Best Regards,
~Arthur Grillo

> Best Regards,
> - Maíra Canal
> 
>> +    bool visible;
>> +
>> +    visible = drm_rect_intersect(&r1_aux, &params->r2);
>> +
>> +    KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, visible, params->should_be_visible);
>> +    drm_rect_compare(test, &r1_aux, &params->expected_intersection);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static struct kunit_case drm_rect_tests[] = {
>>       KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_rect_clip_scaled_div_by_zero),
>>       KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_rect_clip_scaled_not_clipped),
>>       KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_rect_clip_scaled_clipped),
>>       KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_rect_clip_scaled_signed_vs_unsigned),
>> +    KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(drm_test_rect_intersect, drm_rect_intersect_gen_params),
>>       { }
>>   };
>>   


More information about the dri-devel mailing list