[PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/ttm: Add I915_BO_PREALLOC
Andrzej Hajda
andrzej.hajda at intel.com
Tue Apr 4 15:30:24 UTC 2023
On 04.04.2023 16:30, Nirmoy Das wrote:
> Add a mechanism to keep existing data when creating
> a ttm object with I915_BO_ALLOC_USER flag.
>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda at intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h | 15 +++++++++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
> index 5dcbbef31d44..830c11431ee8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
> @@ -328,6 +328,12 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
> */
> #define I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY BIT(6)
> #define I915_BO_ALLOC_CCS_AUX BIT(7)
> +/*
> + * Object is allowed to retain its initial data and will not be cleared on first
> + * access if used along with I915_BO_ALLOC_USER. This is mainly to keep
> + * preallocated framebuffer data intact while transitioning it to i915drmfb.
> + */
> +#define I915_BO_PREALLOC BIT(8)
> #define I915_BO_ALLOC_FLAGS (I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS | \
> I915_BO_ALLOC_VOLATILE | \
> I915_BO_ALLOC_CPU_CLEAR | \
> @@ -335,10 +341,11 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
> I915_BO_ALLOC_PM_VOLATILE | \
> I915_BO_ALLOC_PM_EARLY | \
> I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY | \
> - I915_BO_ALLOC_CCS_AUX)
> -#define I915_BO_READONLY BIT(8)
> -#define I915_TILING_QUIRK_BIT 9 /* unknown swizzling; do not release! */
> -#define I915_BO_PROTECTED BIT(10)
> + I915_BO_ALLOC_CCS_AUX | \
> + I915_BO_PREALLOC)
> +#define I915_BO_READONLY BIT(9)
> +#define I915_TILING_QUIRK_BIT 10 /* unknown swizzling; do not release! */
> +#define I915_BO_PROTECTED BIT(11)
> /**
> * @mem_flags - Mutable placement-related flags
> *
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c
> index dd188dfcc423..69eb20ed4d47 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c
> @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ int i915_ttm_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
> struct dma_fence *migration_fence = NULL;
> struct ttm_tt *ttm = bo->ttm;
> struct i915_refct_sgt *dst_rsgt;
> - bool clear;
> + bool clear, prealloc_bo;
> int ret;
>
> if (GEM_WARN_ON(i915_ttm_is_ghost_object(bo))) {
> @@ -632,7 +632,8 @@ int i915_ttm_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
> return PTR_ERR(dst_rsgt);
>
> clear = !i915_ttm_cpu_maps_iomem(bo->resource) && (!ttm || !ttm_tt_is_populated(ttm));
> - if (!(clear && ttm && !(ttm->page_flags & TTM_TT_FLAG_ZERO_ALLOC))) {
> + prealloc_bo = obj->flags & I915_BO_PREALLOC;
> + if (!(clear && ttm && !((ttm->page_flags & TTM_TT_FLAG_ZERO_ALLOC) && !prealloc_bo))) {
This looks like school exercise for complicated usage of logical
operators, and I have problem with understanding this :)
Couldn't this be somehow simplified?
Anyway as the patch just reuses existing code:
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda at intel.com>
Regards
Andrzej
> struct i915_deps deps;
>
> i915_deps_init(&deps, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN);
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list