[PATCH 1/8] drm/gma500: Use drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> writes:

[...]

>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__aperture_remove_legacy_vga_devices);
>> 
>> I would just call this symbol aperture_remove_legacy_vga_devices() as
>> mentioned, the fact that aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices() use it
>> internally is an implementation detail IMO. But it's an exported symbol so
>> the naming should be consistent.
>
> That prefix __ is supposed to indicate that it's not a all-in-one 
> solution. Most of all, it doesn't do sysfb_disable(). The helper is 
> meant to be used as part of a larger function. I tried to outline this 
> in the comment, where I say that drivers should first aquire framebuffer 
> ownership and then call this helper. If naming isn't a showstopper, I'd 
> like to keep the underscores.
>

Sure, I see that we have other symbols exported in DRM that have a __
prefix in their name. So maybe I am the one who was confused on the
meaning of it.

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat