[PATCH v4 34/42] drm/msm/dpu: enable DSPP and DSC on sc8180x
Dmitry Baryshkov
dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org
Sat Apr 8 00:08:22 UTC 2023
On 08/04/2023 02:43, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>
>
> On 4/4/2023 6:06 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> Enable DSPP and DSC hardware blocks on sc8180x platform.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
>> ---
>> .../msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_5_1_sc8180x.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_5_1_sc8180x.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_5_1_sc8180x.h
>> index fb8cdcd6bfe9..93d303cc0dc5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_5_1_sc8180x.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_5_1_sc8180x.h
>> @@ -102,9 +102,9 @@ static const struct dpu_sspp_cfg sc8180x_sspp[] = {
>> static const struct dpu_lm_cfg sc8180x_lm[] = {
>> LM_BLK("lm_0", LM_0, 0x44000, MIXER_SDM845_MASK,
>> - &sdm845_lm_sblk, PINGPONG_0, LM_1, 0),
>> + &sdm845_lm_sblk, PINGPONG_0, LM_1, DSPP_0),
>> LM_BLK("lm_1", LM_1, 0x45000, MIXER_SDM845_MASK,
>> - &sdm845_lm_sblk, PINGPONG_1, LM_0, 0),
>> + &sdm845_lm_sblk, PINGPONG_1, LM_0, DSPP_1),
>> LM_BLK("lm_2", LM_2, 0x46000, MIXER_SDM845_MASK,
>> &sdm845_lm_sblk, PINGPONG_2, LM_3, 0),
>> LM_BLK("lm_3", LM_3, 0x47000, MIXER_SDM845_MASK,
>> @@ -115,6 +115,17 @@ static const struct dpu_lm_cfg sc8180x_lm[] = {
>> &sdm845_lm_sblk, PINGPONG_5, LM_4, 0),
>> };
>> +static const struct dpu_dspp_cfg sc8180x_dspp[] = {
>> + DSPP_BLK("dspp_0", DSPP_0, 0x54000, DSPP_SC7180_MASK,
>> + &sm8150_dspp_sblk),
>> + DSPP_BLK("dspp_1", DSPP_1, 0x56000, DSPP_SC7180_MASK,
>> + &sm8150_dspp_sblk),
>> + DSPP_BLK("dspp_2", DSPP_2, 0x58000, DSPP_SC7180_MASK,
>> + &sm8150_dspp_sblk),
>> + DSPP_BLK("dspp_3", DSPP_3, 0x5a000, DSPP_SC7180_MASK,
>> + &sm8150_dspp_sblk),
>> +};
>
> I was looking at DSPP_SC7180_MASK. This has only PCC. Today the only
> DSPP feature we are supporting seems to be PCC as the "gc" base is not
> used. In that aspect this is fine. Perhaps getting rid of
> DSPP_SC7180_MASK and just using the feature mask directly is more
> appropriate here. So BIT(DPU_DSPP_PCC). I dont know if you want to
> handle that in a separate series to replace DSPP_SC7180_MASK with
> BIT(DPU_DSPP_PCC)
I have not yet had time to look on the DSPP details and/or different
features per SoC. So, I followed current approach. If anybody has time
to take a look and cleanup DSPP handling, I'd be grateful. If not, it
will wait for somebody to volunteer (or for you or me to have time for
that).
>
> So do we also need to correct the msm8998 DSPP mask because gc is really
> not programmed today from what I can see. So that mask really is not
> doing anything.
>
>> +
>> static const struct dpu_pingpong_cfg sc8180x_pp[] = {
>> PP_BLK_TE("pingpong_0", PINGPONG_0, 0x70000, MERGE_3D_0,
>> sdm845_pp_sblk_te,
>> DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 8),
>> @@ -142,6 +153,13 @@ static const struct dpu_merge_3d_cfg
>> sc8180x_merge_3d[] = {
>> MERGE_3D_BLK("merge_3d_2", MERGE_3D_2, 0x83200),
>> };
>> +static const struct dpu_dsc_cfg sc8180x_dsc[] = {
>> + DSC_BLK("dsc_0", DSC_0, 0x80000, BIT(DPU_DSC_OUTPUT_CTRL)),
>> + DSC_BLK("dsc_1", DSC_1, 0x80400, BIT(DPU_DSC_OUTPUT_CTRL)),
>> + DSC_BLK("dsc_2", DSC_2, 0x80800, BIT(DPU_DSC_OUTPUT_CTRL)),
>> + DSC_BLK("dsc_3", DSC_3, 0x80c00, BIT(DPU_DSC_OUTPUT_CTRL)),
>> +};
>
> There is also DSC_4 and DSC_5 at 0x81000 and 0x81400 resp.
Hmm. I was using sdmshrike-sde.dtsi as a reference. I'll add two more
DSC units.
>
> Rest LGTM.
Thanks
>
>> +
>> static const struct dpu_intf_cfg sc8180x_intf[] = {
>> INTF_BLK("intf_0", INTF_0, 0x6a000, 0x280, INTF_DP,
>> MSM_DP_CONTROLLER_0, 24, INTF_SC7180_MASK, MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 24, 25),
>> INTF_BLK("intf_1", INTF_1, 0x6a800, 0x2bc, INTF_DSI, 0, 24,
>> INTF_SC7180_MASK, MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 26, 27),
>> @@ -190,6 +208,10 @@ static const struct dpu_mdss_cfg sc8180x_dpu_cfg = {
>> .sspp = sc8180x_sspp,
>> .mixer_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sc8180x_lm),
>> .mixer = sc8180x_lm,
>> + .dspp_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sc8180x_dspp),
>> + .dspp = sc8180x_dspp,
>> + .dsc_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sc8180x_dsc),
>> + .dsc = sc8180x_dsc,
>> .pingpong_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sc8180x_pp),
>> .pingpong = sc8180x_pp,
>> .merge_3d_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sc8180x_merge_3d),
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list