[PATCH v5 4/4] drm/msm/dpu: use CTL_SC7280_MASK for sm8450's ctl_0

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On sm8450 platform the CTL_0 doesn't differ from the rest of CTL blocks,
so switch it to CTL_SC7280_MASK too.

Some background: original commit 100d7ef6995d ("drm/msm/dpu: add support
for SM8450") had all (relevant at that time) bit spelled individually.
Then commit 0e91bcbb0016 ("drm/msm/dpu: Add SM8350 to hw catalog"),
despite being a mismerge, correctly changed all other CTL entries to use
CTL_SC7280_MASK, except CTL_0.

While the current BLOCK_SOC_MASK style is not ideal (and while we are
working on a better scheme), let's follow its usage as a least minimal
surprise. For example, sc8280xp, a close associate of sm8450, also uses
CTL_SC7280_MASK.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_8_1_sm8450.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_8_1_sm8450.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_8_1_sm8450.h
index e111ca1f4bf5..221358b9892e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_8_1_sm8450.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_8_1_sm8450.h
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static const struct dpu_ctl_cfg sm8450_ctl[] = {
 	{
 	.name = "ctl_0", .id = CTL_0,
 	.base = 0x15000, .len = 0x204,
-	.features = BIT(DPU_CTL_ACTIVE_CFG) | BIT(DPU_CTL_SPLIT_DISPLAY) | BIT(DPU_CTL_FETCH_ACTIVE),
+	.features = BIT(DPU_CTL_SPLIT_DISPLAY) | CTL_SC7280_MASK,
 	.intr_start = DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR2, 9),
 	},
 	{
-- 
2.39.2