[PATCH] drm/panel: novatek-nt35950: Improve error handling

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 17/04/23 11:44, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto:
> Il 17/04/23 09:25, Neil Armstrong ha scritto:
>> On 15/04/2023 13:00, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> In a very peculiar case when probing and registering with the secondary
>>> DSI host succeeds, but the OF backlight or DSI attachment fails, the
>>> primary DSI device is automatically cleaned up, but the secondary one
>>> is not, leading to -EEXIST when the driver core tries to handle
>>> -EPROBE_DEFER.
>>>
>>> Unregister the DSI1 device manually on failure to prevent that.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 623a3531e9cf ("drm/panel: Add driver for Novatek NT35950 DSI DriverIC 
>>> panels")
>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio at linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt35950.c | 8 +++++++-
>>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt35950.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt35950.c
>>> index abf752b36a52..7498fc6258bb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt35950.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-novatek-nt35950.c
>>> @@ -585,8 +585,11 @@ static int nt35950_probe(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
>>>                  DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DSI);
>>>       ret = drm_panel_of_backlight(&nt->panel);
>>> -    if (ret)
>>> +    if (ret) {
> 
> If this is not a dual-DSI case, nt->dsi[1] will be NULL: I agree it's still
> fine as in the kernel won't crash in that case, but for logical correctness
> I would still account for that:
> 
>          if (num_dsis == 2)
>              mipi_dsi_device_unregister(nt->dsi[1]);
> 
>>> +        mipi_dsi_device_unregister(nt->dsi[1]);
>>> +
>>>           return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to get backlight\n");
>>> +    }
>>>       drm_panel_add(&nt->panel);
>>> @@ -602,6 +605,9 @@ static int nt35950_probe(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
>>>           ret = mipi_dsi_attach(nt->dsi[i]);
>>>           if (ret < 0) {
> 
> Same here, please add a check for num_dsis.
> 
> Regards,
> Angelo

Eh, too late, I just noticed that this got picked already...