[PATCH v3] drm/fbdev-generic: prohibit potential out-of-bounds access
Thomas Zimmermann
tzimmermann at suse.de
Wed Apr 19 15:46:58 UTC 2023
Hi
Am 19.04.23 um 17:09 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 at 20:16, Sui Jingfeng <15330273260 at 189.cn> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2023/4/19 01:52, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 2023/4/18 16:32, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 07:32:19PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
>>>>> The fbdev test of IGT may write after EOF, which lead to out-of-bound
>>>>> access for the drm drivers using fbdev-generic. For example, on a x86
>>>>> + aspeed bmc card platform, with a 1680x1050 resolution display,
>>>>> running
>>>>> fbdev test if IGT will cause the linux kernel hang with the following
>>>>> call trace:
>>>>>
>>>>> Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
>>>>> [IGT] fbdev: starting subtest eof
>>>>> Workqueue: events drm_fb_helper_damage_work [drm_kms_helper]
>>>>> [IGT] fbdev: starting subtest nullptr
>>>>>
>>>>> RIP: 0010:memcpy_erms+0xa/0x20
>>>>> RSP: 0018:ffffa17d40167d98 EFLAGS: 00010246
>>>>> RAX: ffffa17d4eb7fa80 RBX: ffffa17d40e0aa80 RCX: 00000000000014c0
>>>>> RDX: 0000000000001a40 RSI: ffffa17d40e0b000 RDI: ffffa17d4eb80000
>>>>> RBP: ffffa17d40167e20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff89522ecff8c0
>>>>> R10: ffffa17d4e4c5000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffa17d4eb7fa80
>>>>> R13: 0000000000001a40 R14: 000000000000041a R15: ffffa17d40167e30
>>>>> FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff895257380000(0000)
>>>>> knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>>> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>>>> CR2: ffffa17d40e0b000 CR3: 00000001eaeca006 CR4: 00000000001706e0
>>>>> Call Trace:
>>>>> <TASK>
>>>>> ? drm_fbdev_generic_helper_fb_dirty+0x207/0x330 [drm_kms_helper]
>>>>> drm_fb_helper_damage_work+0x8f/0x170 [drm_kms_helper]
>>>>> process_one_work+0x21f/0x430
>>>>> worker_thread+0x4e/0x3c0
>>>>> ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
>>>>> kthread+0xf4/0x120
>>>>> ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
>>>>> ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50
>>>>> </TASK>
>>>>> CR2: ffffa17d40e0b000
>>>>> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>>>>
>>>>> The direct reason is that damage rectange computed by
>>>>> drm_fb_helper_memory_range_to_clip() does not guaranteed to be
>>>>> in-bound.
>>>>> It is already results in workaround code populate to elsewhere. Another
>>>>> reason is that exposing a larger buffer size than the actual needed
>>>>> help
>>>>> to trigger this bug intrinsic in drm_fb_helper_memory_range_to_clip().
>>>>>
>>>>> Others fbdev emulation solutions write to the GEM buffer directly, they
>>>>> won't reproduce this bug because the .fb_dirty function callback do not
>>>>> being hooked, so no chance is given to
>>>>> drm_fb_helper_memory_range_to_clip()
>>>>> to generate a out-of-bound when drm_fb_helper_sys_write() is called.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch break the trigger condition of this bug by shrinking the
>>>>> shadow
>>>>> buffer size to sizes->surface_height * buffer->fb->pitches[0].
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: '8fbc9af55de0 ("drm/fbdev-generic: Set screen size to size of
>>>>> GEM
>>>>> buffer")'
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng at loongson.cn>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fbdev_generic.c | 2 +-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fbdev_generic.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fbdev_generic.c
>>>>> index 8e5148bf40bb..b057cfbba938 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fbdev_generic.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fbdev_generic.c
>>>>> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static int
>>>>> drm_fbdev_generic_helper_fb_probe(struct drm_fb_helper *fb_helper,
>>>>> fb_helper->buffer = buffer;
>>>>> fb_helper->fb = buffer->fb;
>>>>> - screen_size = buffer->gem->size;
>>>>> + screen_size = sizes->surface_height * buffer->fb->pitches[0];
>>>> So I read core some more and stumbled over drm_fb_helper_deferred_io().
>>>> Which has all the code and comments about this, including limiting.
>>>>
>>>> I think it would be clearer if we fix the issue there, instead of
>>>> passing
>>>> limits around in obscure places that then again get broken?
>>>
>>> No, it is more obscure doing that way...
>>>
>>>
>>> As the size of the shadow screen buffer will be exposed to userspace.
>>>
>>> The size 'helper->fb->height * helper->fb->pitches[0]' is a
>>> exactly(best) fit,
>>>
>>> You are guaranteed to waste at lease one byte by increasing one byte,
>>>
>>> and can not store all pixels by decreasing one byte (In the case where
>>> `helper->fb->pitches[0] = helper->fb->width * 4`).
>>>
>>> It implicitly tell the userspace do not go beyond that boundary.
>>>
>>> although userspace program can still choose to write after EOF,
>>>
>>> But it is for test purpose, to test the kernel if it can return a
>>> -EFBIG or not.
>>>
>>>> The thing is,
>>>> Thomas both authored the limit checks in drm_fb_helper_deferred_io() and
>>>> the patch which broken them again, so clearly this isn't very
>>>> obvious. I'm
>>>> thinking of something like this:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
>>>> index ef4eb8b12766..726dab67c359 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c
>>>> @@ -697,10 +697,7 @@ void drm_fb_helper_deferred_io(struct fb_info
>>>> *info, struct list_head *pagerefli
>>>> * of the screen and account for non-existing scanlines. Hence,
>>>> * keep the covered memory area within the screen buffer.
>>>> */
>>>> - if (info->screen_size)
>>>> - total_size = info->screen_size;
>>>> - else
>>>> - total_size = info->fix.smem_len;
>>>> + total_size = helper->fb->height * helper->fb->pitches[0];
>>>
>>> This is just to mitigate the mistakes already has been made,
>>>
>>> because it do not do a good splitting between the *clip* part and the
>>> *damage update* part.
>>>
>>> An ideal clipping do not obscure its updating backend with a
>>> out-of-bound damage rectangle.
>>>
>>> Why did the drm_fb_helper_memory_range_to_clip() can not do a good job
>>> in all case
>>>
>>> to pass its backend a always meaningful damage rect ?
>>>
>>>> max_off = min(max_off, total_size);
>>>> if (min_off < max_off) {
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think that would make it utmost clear on what we're doing and why.
>>>> Otherwise we're just going to re-create the same bug again, like we've
>>>> done already :-)
>>>
>>> No, we create no bugs, we fix one.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>> But honestly I do not have strong feel toward this, I just type what I'm
>> understand without seeing you resend a V3.
>>
>> It's OK in overall, I will help to test this tomorrow. :-)
>
> Apologies for making you jump around all the time and doing different
> versions of the same bugfix :-/
>
> I think this one here is ok to merge, I just thought when looking at
> the history that we revert the exact patch without any other changes
> or comments, and usually that means someone will come up with the same
> cleanup idea again, and then we'll have a bug again. So maybe a
> comment or a WARN_ON or something else would be good.
>
> I guess we could also do your patch, but put a WARN_ON that the
> computed total_size is never bigger than the drm_fb size into
> drm_fb_helper_deferred_io()? That would also make sure that this bug
> doesn't get resurrected again.
We'd have to put this test into drm_fbdev_generic.c. Otherwise we'll
break i915, which also uses deferred I/O, but without shadow buffering..
Maybe test in drm_fbdev_generic_helper_fb_dirty() if the clip rectangle
extends the framebuffer size.
Best regards
Thomas
> -Daniel
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20230419/8fa48be5/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list