[PATCH v1 4/5] drm/msm/dpu: calculate DSC encoder parameters dynamically

Dmitry Baryshkov dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org
Fri Apr 21 21:31:32 UTC 2023


On 22/04/2023 00:30, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
> 
> On 4/21/2023 2:13 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 22/04/2023 00:07, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/20/2023 5:27 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>> On 21/04/2023 02:25, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
>>>>> During DSC preparation, add run time calculation to figure out what
>>>>> usage modes, split mode and merge mode, is going to be setup.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh at quicinc.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 56 
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++-------------
>>>>>   1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c 
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
>>>>> index 2fdacf1..5677728 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
>>>>> @@ -529,17 +529,9 @@ void dpu_encoder_helper_split_config(
>>>>>   bool dpu_encoder_use_dsc_merge(struct drm_encoder *drm_enc)
>>>>>   {
>>>>>       struct dpu_encoder_virt *dpu_enc = to_dpu_encoder_virt(drm_enc);
>>>>> -    int i, intf_count = 0, num_dsc = 0;
>>>>> +    struct msm_display_topology *topology = &dpu_enc->topology;
>>>>>   -    for (i = 0; i < MAX_PHYS_ENCODERS_PER_VIRTUAL; i++)
>>>>> -        if (dpu_enc->phys_encs[i])
>>>>> -            intf_count++;
>>>>> -
>>>>> -    /* See dpu_encoder_get_topology, we only support 2:2:1 
>>>>> topology */
>>>>> -    if (dpu_enc->dsc)
>>>>> -        num_dsc = 2;
>>>>> -
>>>>> -    return (num_dsc > 0) && (num_dsc > intf_count);
>>>>> +    return (topology->num_dsc > topology->num_intf);
>>>>>   }
>>>>>     static void dpu_encoder_get_topology(
>>>>> @@ -1861,41 +1853,57 @@ static void dpu_encoder_prep_dsc(struct 
>>>>> dpu_encoder_virt *dpu_enc,
>>>>>       struct dpu_encoder_phys *enc_master = dpu_enc->cur_master;
>>>>>       struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
>>>>>       struct dpu_hw_pingpong *hw_pp[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
>>>>> +    struct msm_display_topology *topology = &dpu_enc->topology;
>>>>>       int this_frame_slices;
>>>>>       int intf_ip_w, enc_ip_w;
>>>>> -    int dsc_common_mode;
>>>>> +    int dsc_common_mode = 0;
>>>>>       int pic_width;
>>>>>       u32 initial_lines;
>>>>> +    int num_dsc, num_intf;
>>>>>       int i;
>>>>>         for (i = 0; i < MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC; i++) {
>>>>>           hw_pp[i] = dpu_enc->hw_pp[i];
>>>>>           hw_dsc[i] = dpu_enc->hw_dsc[i];
>>>>> -
>>>>> -        if (!hw_pp[i] || !hw_dsc[i]) {
>>>>> -            DPU_ERROR_ENC(dpu_enc, "invalid params for DSC\n");
>>>>> -            return;
>>>>> -        }
>>>>
>>> Why?
>>>
>>> MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC == 2
>>>
>>> This works for dsi since it use 2 dsc encoder.
>>>
>>> Since DP only use one dsc encoder, this will cause it return at loop 
>>> 2 without execute dpu_encoder_dsc_pipe_cfg().
>>
>> Then the loop should go up to num_dsc rather than MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>       }
>>>>>   -    dsc_common_mode = 0;
>>>>> +    num_dsc = topology->num_dsc;
>>>>> +    num_intf = topology->num_intf;
>>>>> +
>>>>>       pic_width = dsc->pic_width;
>>>>>   -    dsc_common_mode = DSC_MODE_MULTIPLEX | DSC_MODE_SPLIT_PANEL;
>>>>>       if (enc_master->intf_mode == INTF_MODE_VIDEO)
>>>>>           dsc_common_mode |= DSC_MODE_VIDEO;
>>>>>   +    /*
>>>>> +     * If this encoder is driving more than one DSC encoder, they
>>>>> +     * operate in tandem, same pic dimension needs to be used by
>>>>> +     * each of them.(pp-split is assumed to be not supported)
>>>>> +     *
>>>>> +     */
>>>>> +
>>>>>       this_frame_slices = pic_width / dsc->slice_width;
>>>>>       intf_ip_w = this_frame_slices * dsc->slice_width;
>>>>> +    enc_ip_w = intf_ip_w;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    intf_ip_w /= num_intf;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    if (num_dsc > 1)
>>>>> +        dsc_common_mode |= DSC_MODE_SPLIT_PANEL;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    if (dpu_encoder_use_dsc_merge(&dpu_enc->base)) {
>>>>> +        dsc_common_mode |= DSC_MODE_MULTIPLEX;
>>>>> +        /*
>>>>> +         * in dsc merge case: when using 2 encoders for the same
>>>>> +         * stream, no. of slices need to be same on both the
>>>>> +         * encoders.
>>>>> +         */
>>>>> +        enc_ip_w = intf_ip_w / 2;
>>>>
>>>> So do you want to get enc_ip_w / 2 or enc_ip_w / num_intf / 2 here?
>>> enc_ip_w / num_intf / 2
>>
>> But previously we had enc_ip_w = intf_ip_w / 2. Was it because of the 
>> assumption that num_intf = 1?
> i think so since there is no num_intf involve at previous code.

Ack.

>>
>>>>
>>>>> +    }
>>>>>   -    /*
>>>>> -     * dsc merge case: when using 2 encoders for the same stream,
>>>>> -     * no. of slices need to be same on both the encoders.
>>>>> -     */
>>>>> -    enc_ip_w = intf_ip_w / 2;
>>>>>       initial_lines = dpu_encoder_dsc_initial_line_calc(dsc, 
>>>>> enc_ip_w);
>>>>>   -    for (i = 0; i < MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC; i++)
>>>>> +    for (i = 0; i < num_dsc; i++)
>>>>>           dpu_encoder_dsc_pipe_cfg(dpu_enc, hw_dsc[i], hw_pp[i], dsc,
>>>>>                       dsc_common_mode, initial_lines);
>>>>>   }
>>>>
>>

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry



More information about the dri-devel mailing list