[Freedreno] [PATCH v2 04/17] drm/msm/dpu: Fix PP_BLK_DIPHER -> DITHER typo
Abhinav Kumar
quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com
Mon Apr 24 23:09:45 UTC 2023
On 4/24/2023 3:30 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2023-04-24 13:53:13, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/17/2023 1:21 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
>>> SM8550 only comes with a DITHER subblock inside the PINGPONG block,
>>> hence the name and a block length of zero. However, the PP_BLK macro
>>> name was typo'd to DIPHER rather than DITHER.
>>>
>>> Fixes: efcd0107727c ("drm/msm/dpu: add support for SM8550")
>>> Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten at somainline.org>
>>
>> This change itself is fine, hence
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com>
>>
>> one comment below
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_9_0_sm8550.h | 16 ++++++++--------
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 2 +-
>>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_9_0_sm8550.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_9_0_sm8550.h
>>> index 9e403034093f..d0ab351b6a8b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_9_0_sm8550.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_9_0_sm8550.h
>>> @@ -132,28 +132,28 @@ static const struct dpu_dspp_cfg sm8550_dspp[] = {
>>> &sm8150_dspp_sblk),
>>> };
>>> static const struct dpu_pingpong_cfg sm8550_pp[] = {
>>
>> dither block should be present on many other chipsets too but looks like
>> on sm8550 was enabling it. Not sure how it was validated there. But we
>> are enabling dither, even other chipsets have this block.
>
> Correct, they all seem to have it starting at sdm845. My patch message
> seems to lack the word "exclusively" as the PP on sm8550 appears to
> exclusively contain a DITHER subblock (unless other blocks are available
> that simply aren't supported within this driver yet) and no other
> registers. Hence this aptly named macro exist to emit just the feature
> bitflag for that and a .len of zero.
>
I think after the TE blocks were moved to INTF, dither is the only
sub-block for all Ping-Pongs not just in sm8550.
> Now, whether we should have the features contain subblock flags rather
> than just scanning for their id's or presence in the subblocks is a
> different discussion / cleanup we should have.
>
Yes, separate patch and hence I gave R-b on this one. But had to leave
this comment to not lose context.
> - Marijn
>
>>> - PP_BLK_DIPHER("pingpong_0", PINGPONG_0, 0x69000, MERGE_3D_0, sc7280_pp_sblk,
>>> + PP_BLK_DITHER("pingpong_0", PINGPONG_0, 0x69000, MERGE_3D_0, sc7280_pp_sblk,
>>> DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 8),
>>> -1),
>>> - PP_BLK_DIPHER("pingpong_1", PINGPONG_1, 0x6a000, MERGE_3D_0, sc7280_pp_sblk,
>>> + PP_BLK_DITHER("pingpong_1", PINGPONG_1, 0x6a000, MERGE_3D_0, sc7280_pp_sblk,
>>> DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 9),
>>> -1),
>>> - PP_BLK_DIPHER("pingpong_2", PINGPONG_2, 0x6b000, MERGE_3D_1, sc7280_pp_sblk,
>>> + PP_BLK_DITHER("pingpong_2", PINGPONG_2, 0x6b000, MERGE_3D_1, sc7280_pp_sblk,
>>> DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 10),
>>> -1),
>>> - PP_BLK_DIPHER("pingpong_3", PINGPONG_3, 0x6c000, MERGE_3D_1, sc7280_pp_sblk,
>>> + PP_BLK_DITHER("pingpong_3", PINGPONG_3, 0x6c000, MERGE_3D_1, sc7280_pp_sblk,
>>> DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 11),
>>> -1),
>>> - PP_BLK_DIPHER("pingpong_4", PINGPONG_4, 0x6d000, MERGE_3D_2, sc7280_pp_sblk,
>>> + PP_BLK_DITHER("pingpong_4", PINGPONG_4, 0x6d000, MERGE_3D_2, sc7280_pp_sblk,
>>> DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR2, 30),
>>> -1),
>>> - PP_BLK_DIPHER("pingpong_5", PINGPONG_5, 0x6e000, MERGE_3D_2, sc7280_pp_sblk,
>>> + PP_BLK_DITHER("pingpong_5", PINGPONG_5, 0x6e000, MERGE_3D_2, sc7280_pp_sblk,
>>> DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR2, 31),
>>> -1),
>>> - PP_BLK_DIPHER("pingpong_6", PINGPONG_6, 0x66000, MERGE_3D_3, sc7280_pp_sblk,
>>> + PP_BLK_DITHER("pingpong_6", PINGPONG_6, 0x66000, MERGE_3D_3, sc7280_pp_sblk,
>>> -1,
>>> -1),
>>> - PP_BLK_DIPHER("pingpong_7", PINGPONG_7, 0x66400, MERGE_3D_3, sc7280_pp_sblk,
>>> + PP_BLK_DITHER("pingpong_7", PINGPONG_7, 0x66400, MERGE_3D_3, sc7280_pp_sblk,
>>> -1,
>>> -1),
>>> };
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
>>> index 03f162af1a50..ca8a02debda9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
>>> @@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ static const struct dpu_pingpong_sub_blks sc7280_pp_sblk = {
>>> .len = 0x20, .version = 0x20000},
>>> };
>>>
>>> -#define PP_BLK_DIPHER(_name, _id, _base, _merge_3d, _sblk, _done, _rdptr) \
>>> +#define PP_BLK_DITHER(_name, _id, _base, _merge_3d, _sblk, _done, _rdptr) \
>>> {\
>>> .name = _name, .id = _id, \
>>> .base = _base, .len = 0, \
>>>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list