[PATCH v2 3/4] drm/msm/dpu: remove GC related code from dpu catalog
Abhinav Kumar
quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com
Thu Apr 27 20:20:28 UTC 2023
On 4/27/2023 8:57 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 26/04/2023 22:22, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>> Since Gamma Correction (GC) block is currently unused, drop
>> related code from the dpu hardware catalog otherwise this
>> becomes a burden to carry across chipsets in the catalog.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk at quicinc.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
>> Link:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230421224721.12738-2-quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 4 +---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h | 6 ------
>> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
>> index 03f162af1a50..badfc3680485 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
>> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
>> #define MERGE_3D_SM8150_MASK (0)
>> -#define DSPP_MSM8998_MASK BIT(DPU_DSPP_PCC) | BIT(DPU_DSPP_GC)
>> +#define DSPP_MSM8998_MASK BIT(DPU_DSPP_PCC)
>> #define DSPP_SC7180_MASK BIT(DPU_DSPP_PCC)
>> @@ -449,8 +449,6 @@ static const struct dpu_lm_sub_blks
>> qcm2290_lm_sblk = {
>> static const struct dpu_dspp_sub_blks msm8998_dspp_sblk = {
>> .pcc = {.id = DPU_DSPP_PCC, .base = 0x1700,
>> .len = 0x90, .version = 0x10007},
>> - .gc = { .id = DPU_DSPP_GC, .base = 0x17c0,
>> - .len = 0x90, .version = 0x10007},
>> };
>> static const struct dpu_dspp_sub_blks sc7180_dspp_sblk = {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
>> index 71584cd56fd7..e0dcef04bc61 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
>> @@ -127,12 +127,10 @@ enum {
>> /**
>> * DSPP sub-blocks
>> * @DPU_DSPP_PCC Panel color correction block
>> - * @DPU_DSPP_GC Gamma correction block
>> * @DPU_DSPP_IGC Inverse gamma correction block
>> */
>> enum {
>> DPU_DSPP_PCC = 0x1,
>> - DPU_DSPP_GC,
>> DPU_DSPP_IGC,
>
> Don't we need to remove this one too (in the previous patch)?
Yes, we should. I thought of it right after sending this. will push a v3
which fixes it in the prev patch.
>
>> DPU_DSPP_MAX
>> };
>> @@ -433,22 +431,18 @@ struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks {
>> * @maxwidth: Max pixel width supported by this mixer
>> * @maxblendstages: Max number of blend-stages supported
>> * @blendstage_base: Blend-stage register base offset
>> - * @gc: gamma correction block
>> */
>> struct dpu_lm_sub_blks {
>> u32 maxwidth;
>> u32 maxblendstages;
>> u32 blendstage_base[MAX_BLOCKS];
>> - struct dpu_pp_blk gc;
>> };
>> /**
>> * struct dpu_dspp_sub_blks: Information of DSPP block
>> - * @gc : gamma correction block
>> * @pcc: pixel color correction block
>> */
>> struct dpu_dspp_sub_blks {
>> - struct dpu_pp_blk gc;
>> struct dpu_pp_blk pcc;
>> };
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list