[Freedreno] [PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: always program dsc active bits

[Marijn Suijten]

On 2023-04-14 16:51:52, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> On 4/14/2023 4:11 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > On 2023-04-14 10:57:45, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> >> On 4/14/2023 10:34 AM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> >>> On 2023-04-14 08:48:43, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> >>>> On 4/14/2023 12:35 AM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> >>>>> On 2023-04-12 10:33:15, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> >>>>> [..]
> >>>>>>> What happens if a device boots without DSC panel connected?  Will
> >>>>>>> CTL_DSC_FLUSH be zero and not (unnecessarily, I assume) flush any of the
> >>>>>>> DSC blocks?  Or could this flush uninitialized state to the block?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If we bootup without DSC panel connected, the kernel's cfg->dsc will be
> >>>>>> 0 and default register value of CTL_DSC_FLUSH will be 0 so it wont flush
> >>>>>> any DSC blocks.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ack, that makes sense.  However, if I connect a DSC panel, then
> >>>>> disconnect it (now the register should be non-zero, but cfg->dsc will be
> >>>>> zero), and then replug a non-DSC panel multiple times, it'll get flushed
> >>>>> every time because we never clear CTL_DSC_FLUSH after that?
> >>>>
> >>>> If we remove it after kernel starts, that issue is there even today
> >>>> without that change because DSI is not a hot-pluggable display so a
> >>>> teardown wont happen when you plug out the panel. How will cfg->dsc be 0
> >>>> then? In that case, its not a valid test as there was no indication to
> >>>> DRM that display was disconnected so we cannot tear it down.
> >>>
> >>> The patch description itself describes hot-pluggable displays, which I
> >>> believe is the upcoming DSC support for DP?  You ask how cfg->dsc can
> >>> become zero, but this is **exactly** what the patch description
> >>> describes, and what this patch is removing the `if` for.  If we are not
> >>> allowed to discuss that scenario because it is not currently supported,
> >>> neither should we allow to apply this patch.
> >>>
> >>> With that in mind, can you re-answer the question?
> >>
> >> I didnt follow what needs to be re-answered.
> >>
> >> This patch is being sent in preparation of the DSC over DP support. This
> >> does not handle non-hotpluggable displays.
> > 
> > Good, because my question is specifically about *hotpluggable*
> > displays/panels like the upcoming DSC support for DP.  After all there
> > would be no point in me suggesting to connect and disconnect
> > non-hotpluggable displays and expect something sensible to happen,
> > wouldn't it?  Allow me to copy-paste the question again for convenience,
> > with some minor wording changes:
> > 
> > 	However, if I connect a DSC DP display, then disconnect it (now the
> > 	register should be non-zero, but cfg->dsc will be zero), and then
> > 	connect and reconnect a non-DSC DP display multiple times, it'll get
> > 	flushed every time because we never clear CTL_DSC_FLUSH after that?
> > 
> > And the missing part is: would multiple flushes be harmful in this case?
> 
> Well, you kept asking about "DSC panel" , that made me think you were 
> asking about a non-hotpluggable MIPI DSI DSC panel and not DP DSC 
> monitor. On many boards, panels can be removed/connected back to their 
> daughter card. The term "panel" confused me a bit.
> 
> Now answering your question.
> 
> Yes, it will get flushed once every hotplug thats not too bad but 
> importantly DSC wont be active as CTL_DSC_ACTIVE will be set to 0 so it 
> wont cause any issue.
> 
> 
> >> I do not think dynamic switch
> >> between DSC and non-DSC of non-hotpluggable displays needs to be
> >> discussed here as its not handled at all with or without this patch.
> >>
> >> We wanted to get early reviews on the patch. If you want this patch to
> >> be absorbed when rest of DSC over DP lands, I have no concerns with
> >> that. I wont pick this up for fixes and we will land this together with
> >> the rest of DP over DSC.
> > 
> > I don't mind when and where this lands, just want to have the semantics
> > clear around persisting the value of CTL_DSC_FLUSh in the register.
> > 
> > Regardless, this patch doesn't sound like a fix but a workaround until
> > reset_intf_cfg() is fixed to be called at the right point, and extended
> > to clear CTL_DSC_ACTIVE and flush the DSCs.  Perhaps it shouldn't have a
> > Fixes: tag for that reason, as you intend to reinstate this
> > if (cfg->dsc) condition when that is done?
> > 
> 
> Its certainly fixing the use-case of DSC to non-DSC switching. So it is 
> a fix.
> 
> But yes not the best fix possible. We have to improve it by moving this 
> to reset_intf_cfg() as I already committed to.

Ack, thanks for confirming this all and working on that, sounds good!

- Marijn