[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/uc: Enhancements to firmware table validation
Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com
Sat Apr 29 01:21:15 UTC 2023
On 4/28/2023 5:32 PM, John Harrison wrote:
> On 4/28/2023 17:30, John Harrison wrote:
>> On 4/28/2023 17:26, Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele wrote:
>>> On 4/28/2023 5:16 PM, John Harrison wrote:
>>>> On 4/28/2023 17:04, Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele wrote:
>>>>> On 4/20/2023 6:15 PM, John.C.Harrison at Intel.com wrote:
>>>>>> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The validation of the firmware table was being done inside the code
>>>>>> for scanning the table for the next available firmware blob.
>>>>>> Which is
>>>>>> unnecessary. So pull it out into a separate function that is only
>>>>>> called once per blob type at init time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, drop the CONFIG_SELFTEST requirement and make errors terminal.
>>>>>> It was mentioned that potential issues with backports would not be
>>>>>> caught by regular pre-merge CI as that only occurs on tip not stable
>>>>>> branches. Making the validation unconditional and failing driver
>>>>>> load
>>>>>> on detecting of a problem ensures that such backports will also be
>>>>>> validated correctly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v2: Change to unconditionally fail module load on a validation error
>>>>>> (review feedback/discussion with Daniele).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c | 157
>>>>>> +++++++++++++----------
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
>>>>>> index c9cd9bb47577f..eb52e8db9ae0b 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
>>>>>> @@ -233,20 +233,22 @@ struct fw_blobs_by_type {
>>>>>> u32 count;
>>>>>> };
>>>>>> +static const struct uc_fw_platform_requirement blobs_guc[] = {
>>>>>> + INTEL_GUC_FIRMWARE_DEFS(MAKE_FW_LIST, GUC_FW_BLOB,
>>>>>> GUC_FW_BLOB_MMP)
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static const struct uc_fw_platform_requirement blobs_huc[] = {
>>>>>> + INTEL_HUC_FIRMWARE_DEFS(MAKE_FW_LIST, HUC_FW_BLOB,
>>>>>> HUC_FW_BLOB_MMP, HUC_FW_BLOB_GSC)
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static const struct fw_blobs_by_type
>>>>>> blobs_all[INTEL_UC_FW_NUM_TYPES] = {
>>>>>> + [INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_GUC] = { blobs_guc, ARRAY_SIZE(blobs_guc) },
>>>>>> + [INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_HUC] = { blobs_huc, ARRAY_SIZE(blobs_huc) },
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> static void
>>>>>> __uc_fw_auto_select(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct
>>>>>> intel_uc_fw *uc_fw)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> - static const struct uc_fw_platform_requirement blobs_guc[] = {
>>>>>> - INTEL_GUC_FIRMWARE_DEFS(MAKE_FW_LIST, GUC_FW_BLOB,
>>>>>> GUC_FW_BLOB_MMP)
>>>>>> - };
>>>>>> - static const struct uc_fw_platform_requirement blobs_huc[] = {
>>>>>> - INTEL_HUC_FIRMWARE_DEFS(MAKE_FW_LIST, HUC_FW_BLOB,
>>>>>> HUC_FW_BLOB_MMP, HUC_FW_BLOB_GSC)
>>>>>> - };
>>>>>> - static const struct fw_blobs_by_type
>>>>>> blobs_all[INTEL_UC_FW_NUM_TYPES] = {
>>>>>> - [INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_GUC] = { blobs_guc,
>>>>>> ARRAY_SIZE(blobs_guc) },
>>>>>> - [INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_HUC] = { blobs_huc,
>>>>>> ARRAY_SIZE(blobs_huc) },
>>>>>> - };
>>>>>> - static bool verified[INTEL_UC_FW_NUM_TYPES];
>>>>>> const struct uc_fw_platform_requirement *fw_blobs;
>>>>>> enum intel_platform p = INTEL_INFO(i915)->platform;
>>>>>> u32 fw_count;
>>>>>> @@ -286,6 +288,11 @@ __uc_fw_auto_select(struct drm_i915_private
>>>>>> *i915, struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw)
>>>>>> continue;
>>>>>> if (uc_fw->file_selected.path) {
>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>> + * Continuing an earlier search after a found blob
>>>>>> failed to load.
>>>>>> + * Once the previously chosen path has been found,
>>>>>> clear it out
>>>>>> + * and let the search continue from there.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> if (uc_fw->file_selected.path == blob->path)
>>>>>> uc_fw->file_selected.path = NULL;
>>>>>> @@ -306,76 +313,91 @@ __uc_fw_auto_select(struct
>>>>>> drm_i915_private *i915, struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw)
>>>>>> /* Failed to find a match for the last attempt?! */
>>>>>> uc_fw->file_selected.path = NULL;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> - /* make sure the list is ordered as expected */
>>>>>> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST) &&
>>>>>> !verified[uc_fw->type]) {
>>>>>> - verified[uc_fw->type] = true;
>>>>>> +static bool validate_fw_table_type(struct drm_i915_private
>>>>>> *i915, enum intel_uc_fw_type type)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + const struct uc_fw_platform_requirement *fw_blobs;
>>>>>> + u32 fw_count;
>>>>>> + int i;
>>>>>> - for (i = 1; i < fw_count; i++) {
>>>>>> - /* Next platform is good: */
>>>>>> - if (fw_blobs[i].p < fw_blobs[i - 1].p)
>>>>>> - continue;
>>>>>> + if (type >= ARRAY_SIZE(blobs_all)) {
>>>>>> + drm_err(&i915->drm, "No blob array for %s\n",
>>>>>> intel_uc_fw_type_repr(type));
>>>>>> + return false;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> - /* Next platform revision is good: */
>>>>>> - if (fw_blobs[i].p == fw_blobs[i - 1].p &&
>>>>>> - fw_blobs[i].rev < fw_blobs[i - 1].rev)
>>>>>> - continue;
>>>>>> + fw_blobs = blobs_all[type].blobs;
>>>>>> + fw_count = blobs_all[type].count;
>>>>>> - /* Platform/revision must be in order: */
>>>>>> - if (fw_blobs[i].p != fw_blobs[i - 1].p ||
>>>>>> - fw_blobs[i].rev != fw_blobs[i - 1].rev)
>>>>>> - goto bad;
>>>>>> + if (!fw_count)
>>>>>> + return true;
>>>>>> - /* Next major version is good: */
>>>>>> - if (fw_blobs[i].blob.major < fw_blobs[i -
>>>>>> 1].blob.major)
>>>>>> - continue;
>>>>>> + /* make sure the list is ordered as expected */
>>>>>> + for (i = 1; i < fw_count; i++) {
>>>>>> + /* Next platform is good: */
>>>>>> + if (fw_blobs[i].p < fw_blobs[i - 1].p)
>>>>>> + continue;
>>>>>> - /* New must be before legacy: */
>>>>>> - if (!fw_blobs[i].blob.legacy && fw_blobs[i -
>>>>>> 1].blob.legacy)
>>>>>> - goto bad;
>>>>>> + /* Next platform revision is good: */
>>>>>> + if (fw_blobs[i].p == fw_blobs[i - 1].p &&
>>>>>> + fw_blobs[i].rev < fw_blobs[i - 1].rev)
>>>>>> + continue;
>>>>>> - /* New to legacy also means 0.0 to X.Y (HuC), or
>>>>>> X.0 to X.Y (GuC) */
>>>>>> - if (fw_blobs[i].blob.legacy && !fw_blobs[i -
>>>>>> 1].blob.legacy) {
>>>>>> - if (!fw_blobs[i - 1].blob.major)
>>>>>> - continue;
>>>>>> + /* Platform/revision must be in order: */
>>>>>> + if (fw_blobs[i].p != fw_blobs[i - 1].p ||
>>>>>> + fw_blobs[i].rev != fw_blobs[i - 1].rev)
>>>>>> + goto bad;
>>>>>> - if (fw_blobs[i].blob.major == fw_blobs[i -
>>>>>> 1].blob.major)
>>>>>> - continue;
>>>>>> - }
>>>>>> + /* Next major version is good: */
>>>>>> + if (fw_blobs[i].blob.major < fw_blobs[i - 1].blob.major)
>>>>>> + continue;
>>>>>> - /* Major versions must be in order: */
>>>>>> - if (fw_blobs[i].blob.major != fw_blobs[i -
>>>>>> 1].blob.major)
>>>>>> - goto bad;
>>>>>> + /* New must be before legacy: */
>>>>>> + if (!fw_blobs[i].blob.legacy && fw_blobs[i -
>>>>>> 1].blob.legacy)
>>>>>> + goto bad;
>>>>>> - /* Next minor version is good: */
>>>>>> - if (fw_blobs[i].blob.minor < fw_blobs[i -
>>>>>> 1].blob.minor)
>>>>>> + /* New to legacy also means 0.0 to X.Y (HuC), or X.0 to
>>>>>> X.Y (GuC) */
>>>>>> + if (fw_blobs[i].blob.legacy && !fw_blobs[i -
>>>>>> 1].blob.legacy) {
>>>>>> + if (!fw_blobs[i - 1].blob.major)
>>>>>> continue;
>>>>>> - /* Minor versions must be in order: */
>>>>>> - if (fw_blobs[i].blob.minor != fw_blobs[i -
>>>>>> 1].blob.minor)
>>>>>> - goto bad;
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> - /* Patch versions must be in order: */
>>>>>> - if (fw_blobs[i].blob.patch <= fw_blobs[i -
>>>>>> 1].blob.patch)
>>>>>> + if (fw_blobs[i].blob.major == fw_blobs[i -
>>>>>> 1].blob.major)
>>>>>> continue;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* Major versions must be in order: */
>>>>>> + if (fw_blobs[i].blob.major != fw_blobs[i - 1].blob.major)
>>>>>> + goto bad;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* Next minor version is good: */
>>>>>> + if (fw_blobs[i].blob.minor < fw_blobs[i - 1].blob.minor)
>>>>>> + continue;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* Minor versions must be in order: */
>>>>>> + if (fw_blobs[i].blob.minor != fw_blobs[i - 1].blob.minor)
>>>>>> + goto bad;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + /* Patch versions must be in order: */
>>>>>> + if (fw_blobs[i].blob.patch <= fw_blobs[i - 1].blob.patch)
>>>>>> + continue;
>>>>>> bad:
>>>>>> - drm_err(&i915->drm, "Invalid %s blob order: %s r%u
>>>>>> %s%d.%d.%d comes before %s r%u %s%d.%d.%d\n",
>>>>>> - intel_uc_fw_type_repr(uc_fw->type),
>>>>>> - intel_platform_name(fw_blobs[i - 1].p),
>>>>>> fw_blobs[i - 1].rev,
>>>>>> - fw_blobs[i - 1].blob.legacy ? "L" : "v",
>>>>>> - fw_blobs[i - 1].blob.major,
>>>>>> - fw_blobs[i - 1].blob.minor,
>>>>>> - fw_blobs[i - 1].blob.patch,
>>>>>> - intel_platform_name(fw_blobs[i].p),
>>>>>> fw_blobs[i].rev,
>>>>>> - fw_blobs[i].blob.legacy ? "L" : "v",
>>>>>> - fw_blobs[i].blob.major,
>>>>>> - fw_blobs[i].blob.minor,
>>>>>> - fw_blobs[i].blob.patch);
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> - uc_fw->file_selected.path = NULL;
>>>>>> - }
>>>>>> + drm_err(&i915->drm, "Invalid %s blob order: %s r%u
>>>>>> %s%d.%d.%d comes before %s r%u %s%d.%d.%d\n",
>>>>>> + intel_uc_fw_type_repr(type),
>>>>>> + intel_platform_name(fw_blobs[i - 1].p), fw_blobs[i -
>>>>>> 1].rev,
>>>>>> + fw_blobs[i - 1].blob.legacy ? "L" : "v",
>>>>>> + fw_blobs[i - 1].blob.major,
>>>>>> + fw_blobs[i - 1].blob.minor,
>>>>>> + fw_blobs[i - 1].blob.patch,
>>>>>> + intel_platform_name(fw_blobs[i].p), fw_blobs[i].rev,
>>>>>> + fw_blobs[i].blob.legacy ? "L" : "v",
>>>>>> + fw_blobs[i].blob.major,
>>>>>> + fw_blobs[i].blob.minor,
>>>>>> + fw_blobs[i].blob.patch);
>>>>>> + return false;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + return true;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> static const char *__override_guc_firmware_path(struct
>>>>>> drm_i915_private *i915)
>>>>>> @@ -443,6 +465,11 @@ void intel_uc_fw_init_early(struct
>>>>>> intel_uc_fw *uc_fw,
>>>>>> uc_fw->type = type;
>>>>>> if (HAS_GT_UC(i915)) {
>>>>>> + if (!validate_fw_table_type(i915, type)) {
>>>>>> + intel_uc_fw_change_status(uc_fw,
>>>>>> INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_ERROR);
>>>>>
>>>>> In our hierarchy of firmware statuses, INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_ERROR
>>>>> includes the fact that the fw has been selected, which in turns
>>>>> implies that file_selected.path is valid. this means that even
>>>>> with enable_guc=0 the wants/uses_guc macro might end up returning
>>>>> true, which is not something we want.
>>>>>
>>>>> Daniele
>>>> Suggestions for a better plan? Add an another status enum? Nothing
>>>> earlier in the sequence seems appropriate. And the init_early stack
>>>> does not support returning error codes.
>>>
>>> I think the question here is: what are you expecting to happen in
>>> case of error and on what platforms? let's say we have an invalid
>>> table entry for ADLP, would the expectation be that all GuC
>>> platforms won't boot, or just ADLP? And is that only if we have
>>> enable_guc set to a positive value, or even if enable_guc=0?
>> The intention is to totally break driver load on any table error.
>>
>> The reason being that someone is back porting a firmware update to
>> ADL-P but breaks DG2 in the process. However, the are only intending
>> to change ADL-P and so don't test on DG2. They therefore don't
>> realise that the driver is now broken for someone else. Whereas, if
>> we make any table error a fatal load failure irrespective of tested
>> platform, enable_guc or other module params, etc. then it is
>> guaranteed to be caught no matter what platform they test on.
>>
> Well, I guess if you are testing on a platform that does'nt use
> GuC/HuC at all (or have enalble_guc=0) then none of this code would
> even run? But then, if you are patching the firmware loading code then
> it is reasonable to expect a test run on at least one firmware enabled
> platform.
I was thinking we could add a new status code, but things then might
become complicated because both the submission mode (GuC vs execlists)
and the FW fetching are tied to the "wants" flag, so I'm not sure how
easy it would be to keep one but skip the other. An alternative option
could be to set the path to a known "invalid" value and fail the fetch
if we get that path (or just fail the fetch if path is NULL and/or
status is error).
Daniele
>
> John.
>
>> John.
>>
>>>
>>> Daniele
>>>
>>>>
>>>> John.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> + return;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> __uc_fw_auto_select(i915, uc_fw);
>>>>>> __uc_fw_user_override(i915, uc_fw);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list