[PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: display: newvision,nv3051d: Add Anbernic 351V Support

[Chris Morgan]

On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 05:24:09PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 10:39:40AM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote:
> > From: Chris Morgan <macromorgan at hotmail.com>
> > 
> > Document the Anbernic RG351V panel, which appears to be identical to
> > the panel used in their 353 series except for in inclusion of an
> > additional DSI format flag.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Morgan <macromorgan at hotmail.com>
> > ---
> >  .../display/panel/newvision,nv3051d.yaml       | 18 ++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/newvision,nv3051d.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/newvision,nv3051d.yaml
> > index 116c1b6030a2..576f3640cb33 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/newvision,nv3051d.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/newvision,nv3051d.yaml
> > @@ -7,9 +7,7 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >  title: NewVision NV3051D based LCD panel
> >  
> >  description: |
> > -  The NewVision NV3051D is a driver chip used to drive DSI panels. For now,
> > -  this driver only supports the 640x480 panels found in the Anbernic RG353
> > -  based devices.
> > +  The NewVision NV3051D is a driver chip used to drive DSI panels.
> >  
> >  maintainers:
> >    - Chris Morgan <macromorgan at hotmail.com>
> > @@ -19,11 +17,15 @@ allOf:
> >  
> >  properties:
> >    compatible:
> > -    items:
> > -      - enum:
> > -          - anbernic,rg353p-panel
> > -          - anbernic,rg353v-panel
> > -      - const: newvision,nv3051d
> > +    oneOf:
> > +      - items:
> > +          - enum:
> > +              - anbernic,rg353p-panel
> > +              - anbernic,rg353v-panel
> > +          - const: newvision,nv3051d
> > +
> > +      - items:
> > +          - const: anbernic,rg351v-panel
> 
> I don't understand. Is this panel not based on newvision,nv3051d? If 
> not, then it probably should be a different binding. Lot's of panel 
> bindings have similar properties.

It appears to be the same panel (or extremely similar, honestly I don't
know because there are no external markings on it). However, this
specific implementation seems to require MIPI_DSI_CLOCK_NON_CONTINUOUS,
not using it prevents the panel from working. As for the existing panel
MIPI_DSI_CLOCK_NON_CONTINUOUS stops it from working. The different
binding essentially determines whether or not that flag is present, but
otherwise everything else is identical.

Chris

> 
> Rob