[PATCH 11/11] drm/bridge: tc358768: Add DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR support
Tomi Valkeinen
tomi.valkeinen at ideasonboard.com
Fri Aug 11 16:58:17 UTC 2023
On 11/08/2023 19:44, Péter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
>
> On 04/08/2023 13:44, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>
> I would rather have a commit message than a blank one.
Oops...
>> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen at ideasonboard.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c
>> index ea19de5509ed..a567f136ddc7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/tc358768.c
>> @@ -131,8 +131,17 @@ static const char * const tc358768_supplies[] = {
>>
>> struct tc358768_dsi_output {
>> struct mipi_dsi_device *dev;
>> +
>> + /* Legacy field if DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR is not used */
>> struct drm_panel *panel;
>> - struct drm_bridge *bridge;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR is not used and a panel is attached
>> + * to tc358768, 'next_bridge' contains the bridge the driver created
>> + * with drm_panel_bridge_add_typed(). Otherwise 'next_bridge' contains
>> + * the next bridge the driver found.
>> + */
>> + struct drm_bridge *next_bridge;
>
> why it is better to call it next_bridge than just bridge? Is there a
> prev_bridge also?
There is, prev bridge would be the bridge behind tc358768 in the chain.
Bridge is tc358768. Next bridge is the following one.
Here, it's in the tc358768_dsi_output struct, so bridge is perhaps ok. I
just wanted to be extra clear here, as I think it's often called
next_bridge in other drivers.
Tomi
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list