[PATCH libdrm v2] amdgpu: Use PRI?64 to format uint64_t
Geert Uytterhoeven
geert at linux-m68k.org
Mon Aug 21 09:14:07 UTC 2023
Hi Christian,
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 9:36 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 2:06 PM Christian König
> <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Am 06.07.23 um 10:36 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> > > On 32-bit:
> > >
> > > ../tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_stress.c: In function ‘alloc_bo’:
> > > ../tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_stress.c:178:49: warning: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ {aka ‘long long unsigned int’} [-Wformat=]
> > > fprintf(stdout, "Allocated BO number %u at 0x%lx, domain 0x%x, size %lu\n",
> > > ~~^
> > > %llx
> > > num_buffers++, addr, domain, size);
> > > ~~~~
>
> [...]
>
> > > Fix this by using the proper "PRI?64" format specifiers.
> > >
> > > Fixes: d77ccdf3ba6f5a39 ("amdgpu: add amdgpu_stress utility v2")
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas at glider.be>
> >
> > Well generally good patch, but libdrm changes are now reviewed by merge
> > request and not on the mailing list any more.
>
> I heard such a rumor, too ;-)
>
> Unfortunately one year later, that process is still not documented in
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/-/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst
> which still instructs me (a casual drive-by developer) to just submit
> my patches to the mailing list...
So a few weeks ago I created gitlab PRs for all my pending libdrm
patch series, and I rebased them regularly when needed.
What needs to be done to get them merged?
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list