[PATCH] drm/bridge/analogix/anx78xx: Extend match data support for ID table

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 9:39 PM Doug Anderson <dianders at chromium.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 10:10 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > No. Please, do not remove the I2C ID table. It had already been
> > > discussed a few years ago.
> > >
> > > > Yes, it make sense, as it saves some memory
> >
> > Okay, reading code a bit, it seems that it won't work with purely i2c
> > ID matching.
>
> OK, so you are in agreement that it would be OK to drop the I2C ID table?

Yes.

> > So the question here is "Do we want to allow enumeration via sysfs or not?"
>
> Is there some pressing need for it? If not, I guess I'd tend to wait
> until someone needs this support before adding it.

Depends. Is this device anyhow useful IRL as standalone if
instantiated via sysfs? I think it may be not, so it's unlikely we
want to have sysfs option for it.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko