[PATCH] drm/bridge/analogix/anx78xx: Extend match data support for ID table

[Marek Behún]

On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 12:59:19 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 9:39 PM Doug Anderson <dianders at chromium.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 10:10 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andy.shevchenko at gmail.com> wrote:  
> > >  
> > > > No. Please, do not remove the I2C ID table. It had already been
> > > > discussed a few years ago.
> > > >  
> > > > > Yes, it make sense, as it saves some memory  
> > >
> > > Okay, reading code a bit, it seems that it won't work with purely i2c
> > > ID matching.  
> >
> > OK, so you are in agreement that it would be OK to drop the I2C ID table?  
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > > So the question here is "Do we want to allow enumeration via sysfs or not?"  
> >
> > Is there some pressing need for it? If not, I guess I'd tend to wait
> > until someone needs this support before adding it.  
> 
> Depends. Is this device anyhow useful IRL as standalone if
> instantiated via sysfs? I think it may be not, so it's unlikely we
> want to have sysfs option for it.
> 

So this is what the id table is about :D I guess I should remove it for
leds-turris-omnia :D