[PATCH 4/5] drm/atomic: Make the drm_atomic_state documentation less ambiguous

[Pekka Paalanen]

On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 10:51:06 +0200
Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen at collabora.com> wrote:

> On Mon,  4 Dec 2023 13:17:06 +0100
> Maxime Ripard <mripard at kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > The current documentation of drm_atomic_state says that it's the "global
> > state object". This is confusing since, while it does contain all the
> > objects affected by an update and their respective states, if an object
> > isn't affected by this update it won't be part of it.
> > 
> > Thus, it's not truly a "global state", unlike object state structures
> > that do contain the entire state of a given object.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard at kernel.org>

Hi Maxime,

could you figure out how your email got the linux.ie address for Dave
Airlie?

I got a bounce from skynet.ie when replying to all. Maybe there is a
leftover email address for Dave still somewhere?


Thanks,
pq
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20231205/e2a9b9b2/attachment.sig>