[PATCH v8 0/8] Improve test coverage of TTM
Andi Shyti
andi.shyti at linux.intel.com
Tue Dec 5 15:39:32 UTC 2023
Hi Karolina and Christian,
> Karolina Stolarek (8):
> drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_resource and ttm_sys_man
> drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_tt
> drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_bo functions
> drm/ttm/tests: Fix argument in ttm_tt_kunit_init()
> drm/ttm/tests: Use an init function from the helpers lib
> drm/ttm/tests: Test simple BO creation and validation
> drm/ttm/tests: Add tests with mock resource managers
> drm/ttm/tests: Add test cases dependent on fence signaling
I see that all these files (and previous patches, as well) don't
have a consistent prefix system, like kunit_ttm_*. But they all
start with ttm_*, thread_*, drm_*, etc, which makes it a bit
difficult to follow and grep through.
Can we please maintain a consistent prefix system?
I know it looks bad to come out with it after this series (and
previous work too) has been out for several months already. I
need to say my "mea culpa" as well as I've been in the review
loop, as well.
Thanks,
Andi
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list