[PATCH -next] drm/nouveau: uapi: fix kerneldoc warnings

[Randy Dunlap]

On 12/25/23 00:30, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> 
> On 25/12/2023 08:40, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> I do see one thing that I don't like in the generated html output.
>> It's not a problem with this patch.
>> The #defines for DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND_OP_MAP etc. have a ';' at the
>> end of each line:
>>
>> struct drm_nouveau_vm_bind_op {
>>      __u32 op;
>> #define DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND_OP_MAP 0x0;
>> #define DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND_OP_UNMAP 0x1;
>>      __u32 flags;
>> #define DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND_SPARSE (1 << 8);
>>      __u32 handle;
>>      __u32 pad;
>>      __u64 addr;
>>      __u64 bo_offset;
>>      __u64 range;
>> };
> 
> Do we actually ever want preprocessor directives to appear inside
> definitions in the output? If not, I think this should work:

Not necessarily.

> diff --git a/scripts/kernel-doc b/scripts/kernel-doc
> index 3cdc7dba37e3..61425fc9645e 100755
> --- a/scripts/kernel-doc
> +++ b/scripts/kernel-doc
> @@ -1259,6 +1259,8 @@ sub dump_struct($$) {
>                 $clause =~ s/\s+$//;
>                 $clause =~ s/\s+/ /;
>                 next if (!$clause);
> +               # skip preprocessor directives
> +               next if $clause =~ m/^#/;
>                 $level-- if ($clause =~ m/(\})/ && $level > 1);
>                 if (!($clause =~ m/^\s*#/)) {
>                         $declaration .= "\t" x $level;
> 
> 

but that didn't work for me.
I don't have time to look into it any more today.  :)

Thanks.

-- 
#Randy
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
https://subspace.kernel.org/etiquette.html