DRM accel and debugfs/sysfs

Maíra Canal mcanal at igalia.com
Tue Feb 7 11:31:23 UTC 2023


Hi Stanislaw,

On 2/1/23 12:20, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I was about to send debugfs support for ivpu and noticed that there
> are current changes that deprecate drm_devel->debugfs_init callback.
> 
> Further I looked at this commit [1], that stated we should not
> use drm_minor for debugfs and sysfs. What is quite contrary to
> what drm accel framework did in the first place.
> 
> So my question is how we should use debugfs/sysfs in accel?
> Use it with old fashioned minor-centric way or change
> the framework somehow ?

As we are trying to replace drm_debugfs_create_files() [1], it would
be nice to see the accel debugfs support use the new debugfs API. This
would mean using the debugfs_list from the drm_device, deprecating
the debugfs_init callback, and adding the a similar code snippet to
accel_debugfs_init:

list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &dev->debugfs_list, list) {
	debugfs_create_file(entry->file.name, 0444,
			    minor->debugfs_root, entry, &drm_debugfs_entry_fops);
	list_del(&entry->list);

Maybe Daniel has some more thoughts on this matter, but I guess it
would be better to drop the use of the old-fashioned minor-centric
implementation in accel.

[1] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/tree/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst#n511

Best Regards,
- Maíra Canal

> 
> [1] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/commit/?id=99845faae7099cd704ebf67514c1157c26960a26
> 
> Regards
> Stanislaw
> 


More information about the dri-devel mailing list